Skip to main content
Log in

Scalable spaces

  • Published:
Inventiones mathematicae Aims and scope

Abstract

Scalable spaces are simply connected compact manifolds or finite complexes whose real cohomology algebra embeds in their algebra of (flat) differential forms. This is a rational homotopy invariant property and all scalable spaces are formal; indeed, scalability can be thought of as a metric version of formality. They are also characterized by particularly nice behavior from the point of view of quantitative homotopy theory. Among other results, we show that spaces which are formal but not scalable provide counterexamples to Gromov’s long-standing conjecture on distortion in higher homotopy groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is essentially the inverse function of the notion used in [12], but accords with the notion of distortion used in geometric group theory.

  2. While the minimal model is unique up to isomorphism, such an isomorphism need not preserve this.

References

  1. Berdnikov, A.: Lipschitz null-homotopy of mappings \(S^3 \rightarrow S^2\), arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02606 (2018)

  2. Chambers, G.R., Dotterrer, D., Manin, F., Weinberger, Sh.: Quantitative null-cobordism. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31(4), 1165–1203 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers, G.R., Manin, F., Weinberger, Sh.: Quantitative nullhomotopy and rational homotopy type. Geomet. Func. Anal. (GAFA) 28(3), 563–588 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Deligne, Pierre, Griffiths, Phillip, Morgan, John, Sullivan, Dennis: Real homotopy theory of Kähler manifolds. Invent. Math. 29(3), 245–274 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Federer, H.: Geometric measure theory, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 153, Springer, (1969)

  6. Félix, Y., Halperin, S., Thomas, J.-C.: Rational homotopy theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 205, Springer, (2012)

  7. Ferry, Steve, Weinberger, Shmuel: Quantitative algebraic topology and lipschitz homotopy. Proceed. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(48), 19246–19250 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gol’dshtein, V.M., Kuz’minov, V.I., Shvedov, I.A.: Differential forms on Lipschitz manifolds. Siberian Math. J. 23(2), 151–161 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffiths, Ph. A., Morgan, J. W.: Rational homotopy theory and differential forms, Birkhäuser, (1981)

  10. Gromov, M.: Homotopical effects of dilatation. J. Differ. Geomet. 13(3), 303–310 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gromov, M.: Metric structures for Riemannian and non-Riemannian spaces, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 152, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1999, with appendices by M. Katz, P. Pansu and S. Semmes, translated from the French by Sean Michael Bates

  12. Gromov, M.: Quantitative homotopy theory, Prospects in mathematics (Princeton, NJ,: Amer. Math. Soc. Providence, RI 1999, 45–49 (1996)

  13. Guth, L.: Recent progress in quantitative topology, Surveys in Differential Geometry,: Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Journal of Differential Geometry, Surv. Differ. Geom., vol. 22. Int. Press, Somerville, MA 2018, 191–216 (2017)

  14. Halperin, Stephen, Stasheff, James: Obstructions to homotopy equivalences. Adv. Math. 32(3), 233–279 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kotschick, D.: On products of harmonic forms. Duke Math. J. 107(3), 521–531 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Manin, F.: Plato’s cave and differential forms. Geomet. Topol. 23(6), 3141–3202 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Manin, F.: A zoo of growth functions of mapping class sets. J. Topol. Anal. 12(3), 841–855 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Manin, F.: Positive weights and self-maps, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear)

  19. Manin, F., Weinberger, Sh.: Integral and rational mapping classes. Duke Math. J. 169(10), 1943–1969 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Shiga, H.: Rational homotopy type and self maps. J. Math. Soc. Japan 31(3), 427–434 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sullivan, D.: Infinitesimal computations in topology. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 1977(47), 269–331 (1978)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenger, S.: Nilpotent groups without exactly polynomial Dehn function. J. Topol. 4(1), 141–160 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Whitney, Hassler: Geometric integration theory, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 21, Princeton University Press, (1957)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Robert Young, who pointed out the reference [22], as well as Robin Elliott and Shmuel Weinberger for other useful comments. We also thank the anonymous referee for a large number of corrections as well as clarifying questions and remarks which greatly improved the exposition and led us to several discoveries. The second author was supported by the NSF via the individual grant DMS-2001042.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fedor Manin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berdnikov, A., Manin, F. Scalable spaces. Invent. math. 229, 1055–1100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-022-01118-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-022-01118-9

Navigation