Skip to main content
Log in

A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive resource theory is a common explanation for both the performance decline in vigilance tasks, known as the vigilance decrement, and the limited ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously. The limited supply of cognitive resources may be utilized faster than they are replenished resulting in a performance decrement, or may need to be allocated among multiple tasks with some performance cost. Researchers have proposed both domain-specific, for example spatial versus verbal processing resources, and domain general cognitive resources. One challenge in testing the domain specificity of cognitive resources in vigilance is the current lack of difficult semantic vigilance tasks which reliably produce a decrement. In the present research, we investigated whether the vigilance decrement was found in a new abbreviated semantic discrimination vigilance task, and whether there was a performance decrement in said vigilance task when paired with a word recall task, as opposed to performed individually. As hypothesized, a vigilance decrement in the semantic vigilance task was found in both the single-task and dual-task conditions, along with reduced vigilance performance in the dual-task condition and reduced word recall in the dual-task condition. This is consistent with cognitive resource theory. The abbreviated semantic vigilance task will be a useful tool for researchers interested in determining the specificity of cognitive resources utilized in vigilance tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariga A, Lleras A (2011) Brief and rare mental “breaks” keep you focused: deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition 118(3):439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caggiano DM, Parasuraman R (2004) The role of memory representation in the vigilance decrement. Psychon B Rev 11(5):932–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Cowan N (2009) How verbal memory loads consume attention. Mem Cognit 37:829–836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan N (1995) Attention and memory: an integrated framework. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling KA, Helton WS (2014) Dual-task interference between climbing and a simulated communication task. Exp Brain Res 232(4):1367–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton JE, Parasuraman R (1993) Sensory and cognitive vigilance: effects of age on performance and subjective workload. Hum Perform 6(1):71–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Duque D, Posner MI (2001) Brain imaging of attentional networks in normal and pathological states. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 23(1):74–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green AL, Helton WS (2011) Dual-task performance during a climbing traverse. Exp Brain Res 215(3–4):307–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of experimental and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland Press, Amsterdam, pp 139–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hautus MJ (1995) Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behav Res Methods Instrum 27(1):46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head J, Helton WS (2012) Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention. Conscious Cogn 21(4):1617–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head J, Helton WS (2014) Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony. Acta Psychol 153:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head J, Russell PN, Dorahy MJ, Neumann E, Helton WS (2012) Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task. Exp Brain Res 216(1):103–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2011) Feature absence–presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention. Psychol Res 75(5):384–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2012) Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused. Exp Brain Res 219(1):37–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2013) Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance. Exp Brain Res 224:429–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2015) Rest is best: the role of rest and task interruptions on vigilance. Cognition 134:165–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Warm JS (2008) Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance. Acta Psychol 129(1):18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable JW, Myers J (2013) An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav Brain Sci 36(06):661–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langner R, Eickhoff SB (2013) Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychol Bull 139(4):870

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Langner R, Willmes K, Chatterjee A, Eickhoff SB, Sturm W (2010) Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance. Psychol Res 74(5):499–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Wu WC, Wang J, Detre JA, Dinges DF, Rao H (2010) Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: an ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect. Neuroimage 49(4):3426–3435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Quevenco FC, Kwok K (2013) EEG alpha activity is associated with individual differences in post-break improvement. Neuroimage 76:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth NH (1948) The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 1(1):6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio A, Yuille JC, Madigan SA (1968) Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. J Exp Psychol 76:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R (1979) Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science 205:924–927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R, Mouloua M (1987) Interaction of signal discriminability and task type in vigilance decrement. Percept Psychophys 41(1):17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross HA, Russell PN, Helton WS (2014) Effects of breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement. Exp Brain Res 232(6):1729–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools Inc., Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw TH, Satterfield K, Ramirez R, Finomore V (2013) Using cerebral hemovelocity to measure workload during a spatialised auditory vigilance task in novice and experienced observers. Ergonomics 56(8):1251–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalma JL, Warm JS, Matthews G, Dember WN, Weiler EM, Meier A, Eggemeier FT (2004) Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Hum Factors 46(2):219–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Temple JG, Warm JS, Dember WN, Jones KS, LaGrange CM, Matthews G (2000) The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Hum Factors 42(2):183–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson DR, Besner D, Smilek D (2015a) A resource-control account of sustained attention evidence from mind-wandering and vigilance paradigms. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(1):82–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson DR, Smilek D, Besner D (2015b) Reducing the vigilance decrement: the effects of perceptual variability. Conscious Cogn 33:386–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (2008) Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors 50:449–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha L. Epling.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix

Appendix

Word recall list 1

Ankle, banner, bullet, cowhide, doorman, hostage, icebox, infant, leopard, locker, missile, monarch, mucous, piano, pudding, saloon, slipper, sulfur, sunburn, thicket.

Word recall list 2

Bandit, blister, butcher, fabric, fiord, harness, jelly, lobster, morgue, nectar, pepper, piston, rattle, reptile, salad, settler, singer, sultan, trumpet, typhoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Epling, S.L., Russell, P.N. & Helton, W.S. A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs. Exp Brain Res 234, 133–139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4444-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4444-0

Keywords

Navigation