Skip to main content
Log in

Neural mechanisms underlying the exploration of small city maps using magnetoencephalography

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying spatial cognition in the context of exploring realistic city maps are unknown. We conducted a novel brain imaging study to address the question of whether and how features of special importance for map exploration are encoded in the brain to make a spatial decision. Subjects explored by eyes small city maps exemplifying five different street network types in order to locate a hypothetical City Hall, while neural activity was recorded continuously by 248 magnetoencephalography (MEG) sensors at high temporal resolution. Monitoring subjects’ eye positions, we locally characterized the maps by computing three spatial parameters of the areas that were explored. We computed the number of street intersections, the total street length, and the regularity index in the circular areas of 6 degrees of visual angle radius centered on instantaneous eye positions. We tested the hypothesis that neural activity during exploration is associated with the spatial parameters and modulated by street network type. All time series were rendered stationary and nonautocorrelated by applying an autoregressive integrated moving average model and taking the residuals. We then assessed the associations between the prewhitened time-varying MEG time series from 248 sensors and the prewhitened spatial parameters time series, for each street network type, using multiple linear regression analyses. In accord with our hypothesis, ongoing neural activity was strongly associated with the spatial parameters through localized and distributed networks, and neural processing of these parameters depended on the type of street network. Overall, processing of the spatial parameters seems to predominantly involve right frontal and prefrontal areas, but not for all street network layouts. These results are in line with findings from a series of previous studies showing that frontal and prefrontal areas are involved in the processing of spatial information and decision making. Modulation of neural processing of the spatial parameters by street network type suggests that some street network layouts may contain other types of spatial information that subjects use to explore maps and make spatial decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggelopoulos N, Rolls E (2005) Scene perception: inferior temporal cortex neurons encode the positions of different objects in the scene. Eur J Neurosci 22:2903–2916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre GK, Detre JA, Alsop DC, D’Esposito M (1996) The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cereb Cortex 6:823–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Box G, Jenkins G, Reinsel G (2008) Time series analysis: forecasting and control, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chafee M, Averbeck B, Crowe D, Georgopoulos AP (2002) Impact of path parameters on maze solution time. Arch Ital Biol 140:247251

    Google Scholar 

  • Christova P, Scoppa M, Peponis J, Georgopoulos AP (2012) Exploring small city maps. Exp Brain Res 223(2):207–217. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3252-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark P, Evans F (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe D, Averbeck B, Chafee M, Anderson J, Georgopoulos AP (2000) Mental maze solving. J Cogn Neurosci 12:813–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feierstein C, Quirk M, Uchida N, Sosulski D, Mainen Z (2006) Representation of spatial goals in rat orbitofrontal cortex. Neuron 51:495–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GM, Watts DG (1968) Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden-Day, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Langheim FJ, Leuthold AC, Georgopoulos AP (2006) Synchronous dynamic brain networks revealed by magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:455–459. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509623102

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold AC (2003) Subtraction of heart artifact from MEG data: the matched filter revisited. 33rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience. New Orleans, LA, 8–12 November. 863.15

  • Leuthold AC, Langheim FJ, Lewis SM, Georgopoulos AP (2005) Time series analysis of magnetoencephalographic data during copying. Exp Brain Res 164:411–422. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2259-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire E, Frackowiak R, Frith C (1998) Recalling routes around london: activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. J Neuroscience 17:7103–7110

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty J (2011) Contribution of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex to goal-directed action selection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1239:118–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa C (2007) Orbitofrontal cortex and the computation of economic value. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1121:232–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa C (2011) Neurobiology of economic choice: a good-based model. Annu Rev Neurosci 34:333–359

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa C, Assad J (2006) Neurons in orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value. Nature 44:223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis J, Wineman J (2002) Spatial structure of environment and behavior. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevosto V, Graf W, Ugolini G (2010) Cerebellar inputs to intraparietal cortex areas lip and mip: functional frameworks for adaptive control of eye movements, reaching, and arm/eye/head movement coordination. Cereb Cortex 20:214–228

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort C, Lefort J, Rondi-Reig L (2013) The cerebellum: a new key structure in the navigation system. Front Neural Circuits 7:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiers H, Maguire E (2006) Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world. Neuroimage 31:1826–1840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiers H, Maguire E (2007) A navigational guidance system in the human brain. Hippocampus 17:618–626

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veneri G, Federico A, Rufa A (2014) Evaluating the influence of motor control on selective attention through a stochastic model: the paradigm of motor control dysfunction in cerebellar patient. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the McKnight Presidential Chair in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Minnesota (A.P.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apostolos P. Georgopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakellaridi, S., Christova, P., Christopoulos, V. et al. Neural mechanisms underlying the exploration of small city maps using magnetoencephalography. Exp Brain Res 233, 3187–3200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4387-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4387-5

Keywords

Navigation