Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dopamine, norepinephrine, and the management of sensorimotor bindings: individual differences in updating of stimulus–response episodes are predicted by DAT1, but not DBH5′-ins/del

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the flexibility of managing (creating and updating) stimulus–response bindings is driven by the dopaminergic system. Given that striatal dopamine (DA) plays a crucial role in the updating of working memory, the present study tested whether individual differences in the efficiency of updating stimulus–response episodes (event files) are predicted by differences in genetic predisposition related to the efficiency of the striatal dopaminergic pathway. In view of contrasting claims that stimulus–response binding is related to norepinephrine, we also considered genetic predispositions regarding noradrenergic pathways. In a sample of 100 healthy adults, we studied whether the degree to which stimulus–response bindings affect ongoing performance is predicted by polymorphisms of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1, associated with striatal DA levels) and DBH5′-ins/del (strongly correlated with dopamine beta-hydroxylase, the enzyme catalyzing the dopamine-norepinephrine conversion). The performance of 9-repeat carriers of the DAT1 gene was more affected by stimulus–response bindings than the performance of 10/10 homozygotes was, while DBH5′-ins/del polymorphism was not related to performance. This outcome pattern suggests a crucial role of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway in the flexible management of stimulus–response episodes, whereas norepinephrine does not seem to play a role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeles M (1991) Corticonics: Neural circuits of the cerebral cortex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RJ, Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ (2006) The binding of visual features in working memory: is integration automatic or resource demanding? J Exp Psychol Gen 135:298–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken U (1999) A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev 106:529–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby FG, Valentin VV, Turken U (2002) The effects of positive affect and arousal on working memory and executive attention: Neurobiology and computational models. In: Moore S, Oaksford M (eds) Emotional cognition: From brain to behavior. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 245–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Balleine BW, O’Doherty JP (2010) Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacol 35:48–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolino A, Blasi G, Latorre V et al (2006) Additive effects of genetic variation in dopamine regulating genes on working memory cortical activity in human brain. J Neurosci 26:3918–3922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blin O, Masson G, Azulay JP, Fondarai J, Serratrice G (1990) Apomorphine-induced blinking and yawning in healthy volunteers. Brit J Clin Pharmaco 30:769–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, Erasmus V, Hommel B (2004) Moderate alcohol consumption in humans impairs feature binding in visual perception but not across perception and action. Neurosci Lett 360:103–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, Fagioli S, Erasmus V, Hommel B (2005) Caffeine, but not nicotine enhances visual feature binding. Eur J Neurosci 21:591–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, Raffone A, Hommel B (2006a) What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. J Exp Psychol HPP 32:705–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, van Wouwe NC, Lavender TJ, Hommel B (2006b) Intelligence and cognitive flexibility: fluid intelligence correlates with feature “unbinding” across perception and action. Psychon Bull Rev 13:1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, van Wouwe NC, Hommel B (2007a) Feature binding and affect: emotional modulation of visuo-motor integration. Neuropsychologia 45:440–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, van Wouwe NC, Hommel B (2007b) Spontaneous eye-blink rate predicts the strength of visuomotor binding. Neuropsychologia 45:2387–2392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, van den Wildenberg W, van der Does WAJ, Hommel B (2010) Genetic markers of striatal dopamine predict individual differences in dysfunctional, but not functional impulsivity. Neuroscience 170:782–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, van Wouwe N, Hommel B, Zmigrod S, Ridderinkhof R, Wylie S (2012a) Dopaminergic modulation of the updating of stimulus-response episodes in Parkinson’s disease. Behav Brain Res 228:82–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato LS, Zmigrod S, Hommel B (2012b) Working memory updating predicts individual differences in updating stimulus-response episodes. Manuscript submitted for publication

  • Cools R (2006) Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive function—Implication for L-DOPA therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:1–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cools R, Gibbs SE, Miyakawa A, Jagust W, D’Esposito M (2008) Working memory capacity predicts dopamine synthesis capacity in the human striatum. J Neurosci 28:1208–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cubells JF, Kranzler HR, McCance-Katz E, Anderson GM, Malison RT, Price LH, Gelernter J (2000) A haplotype at the DBH locus, associated with low plasma dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity, also associates with cocaine-induced paranoia. Mol Psychiat 5:56–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit S, Barker R, Dickinson A, Cools R (2011) Habitual versus goal-directed action control in Parkinson’s disease. J Cogn Neurosci 23:1218–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DNA Genotek, Inc. (2006) Oragene™ product brochure. Ottawa: DNA Genotek, Inc

  • Engel AK, Singer W (2001) Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends Cogn Sci 11:16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floresco S, West A, Ash B, Moore H, Grace A (2003) Afferent modulation of dopamine neuron firing differentially regulates tonic and phasic dopamine transmission. Nature Neurosci 6:968–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grace AA (1991) Phasic versus tonic dopamine release and the modulation of dopamine system responsivity: a hypothesis for the ethiology of schizophrenia. Neuroscience 41:1–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grahn JA, Parkinson JA, Owen AM (2008) The cognitive functions of the caudate nucleus. Prog Neurobiol 86:141–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harley CW (2004) Norepinephrine and dopamine as learning signals. Neural Plast 11:191–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harmer CJ, McTavish SF, Clark L, Goodwin GM, Cowen PJ (2001) Tyrosine depletion attenuates dopamine function in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacol 151:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison BJ, Olver JS, Norman TR, Burrows GD, Wesnes KA, Nathan PJ (2004) Selective effects of acute serotonin and catecholamine depletion on memory in healthy women. J Psychopharmacol 18:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz A, Goldman D, Jones D, Palmour R, Hommer D, Gorey J, Lee K, Linnoila M, Weinberger D (2000) Genotype influences in vivo dopamine transporter availability in human striatum. Neuropsychopharmacol 22:133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (1998) Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus response episodes. Vis Cogn 5:183–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (2004) Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends Cogn Sci 8:494–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (2005) How much attention does an event file need? J Exp Psychol HPP 31:1067–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B, Colzato LS (2004) Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Vis Cogn 11:483–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B, Colzato LS (2009) When an object is more than a binding of its features: evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Vis Cogn 17:120–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B, Kray J, Lindenberger U (2011) Feature integration across the lifespan: stickier stimulus-response bindings in children and older adults. Front Psychol 2:268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiw GE, Bongiovanni R (2004) Brain tyrosine depletion attenuates haloperidol-induced striatal dopamine release in vivo and augments haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats. Psychopharmacol 172:100–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen O, Kaiser J, Lachaux JP (2007) Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends in Neurosci 30:317–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karson CN (1983) Spontaneous eye-blink rates and dopaminergic systems. Brain 106:643–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleven MS, Koek W (1996) Differential effects of direct and indirect dopamine agonists on eye blink rate in cynomolgus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Therap 279:1211–1219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn S, Keizer A, Colzato LS, Rombouts SAB, Hommel B (2011) The neural underpinnings of event-file management: evidence for stimulus-induced activation of, and competition among stimulus-response bindings. J Cogn Neurosci 23:896–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Sheehan KH (1997) The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): a short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry 12:224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D, Melchitzky D, Sesack S, Whitehead R, Auh S, Sampson A (2001) Dopamine transporter immunoreactivity in monkey cerebral cortex: regional, laminar, and ultrastructural localization. J Comp Neurol Psychol 432:119–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Hämmerer D, Müller V, Hommel B, Lindenberger U (2009) Lifespan development of stimulus-response conflict cost: similarities and differences between maturation and senescence. Psychol Res 73:777–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ, Vogel EK (1997) The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390:279–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RJ, White NM (1993) A triple dissociation of memory systems: hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum. Behav Neurosci 107(1):3–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa AA, Sherman SJ, Frank MJ (2008) A dopaminergic basis for working memory, learning and attentional shifting in Parkinsonism. Neuropsychologia 46:3144–3156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias J, Burley MW, Povey S, Porter C, Craig I, Wolfe J (1992) A 19 bp deletion polymorphism adjacent to a dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the human dopamine beta-hydroxylase locus. Hum Mol Genet 1:286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J (1988) Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Lewis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading PJ, Dunnett SB, Robbins TW (1991) Dissociable roles of the ventral, medial and lateral striatum on the acquisition and performance of a complex visual stimulus-response habit. Behav Brain Res 45:147–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Bermudez R, Kallenbach U, Singer W, Munk MH (2004) Short- and long-term effects of cholinergic modulation on gamma oscillations and response synchronization in the visual cortex. J Neurosci 24:10369–10378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax KW, Strakowski SM (1998) Enhanced behavioral response to repeated d-amphetamine and personality traits in humans. Biol Psychiat 44:1192–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sesack SR, Hawrylak VA, Matus C, Guido MA, Levey A (1998) Dopamine axon varicosities in the prelimbic division of the rat prefrontal cortex exhibit sparse immunoreactivity for the dopamine transporter. J Neurosci 18:2697–2708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shumay E, Chen J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND (2011) Genotype and ancestry modulate brain’s DAT availability in healthy humans. PLoS One 6:e22754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siessmeier T, Kienast T, Wrase J, Larsen JL, Braus DF, Smolka MN et al (2006) Net influx of plasma 6-[18F]fluoro-l-DOPA (FDOPA) to the ventral striatum correlates with prefrontal processing of affective stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 24:305–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JR, Elsworth JD, Lawrence MS, Sladek JR, Roth RH, Redmond DE (1999) Spontaneous blink rates correlate with dopamine levels in the caudate nucleus of MPTP-treated monkeys. Exp Neurol 158:214–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam WO, Hommel B (2010) How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location. J Exp Psychol HPP 36:1184–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Giessen E, de Win MM, Tanck MW, van den Brink W, Baas F, Booij J (2009) Striatal dopamine transporter availability associated with polymorphisms in the dopamine transporter gene SLC6A3. J Nucl Med 50:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verguts T, Notebaert W (2009) Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci 13:252–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman ID, Rowe DC, Abrinteamowitz S, Kozel T, Mohr JH, Sherman L et al (1998) Association and linkage of the dopamine transporter gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: heterogeneity owing to diagnostic subtype and severity. Am J Hum Genet 63:1767–1776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin H, Knowlton B, Balleine B (2004) Lesion of dorsolateral striatum preserve outcome expectancy but disrupt habit formation in instrumental learning. Eur J Neurosci 19:181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sabine Maaskant, Willem Turnhout, Raoul Putman, Alain Boersen, Marieke van der Meer, and Linda van Hooidonk for their enthusiasm and invaluable assistance in recruiting, testing the participants of this study and collecting the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Lorenza S. Colzato, Sharon Zmigrod & Bernhard Hommel

Authors
  1. Lorenza S. Colzato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon Zmigrod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernhard Hommel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenza S. Colzato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colzato, L.S., Zmigrod, S. & Hommel, B. Dopamine, norepinephrine, and the management of sensorimotor bindings: individual differences in updating of stimulus–response episodes are predicted by DAT1, but not DBH5′-ins/del. Exp Brain Res 228, 213–220 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3553-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3553-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation