Abstract
Here we aim to evaluate the ability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which is applied over Wernicke’s area and its right homologue, to influence lexical decisions and semantic priming and establish an involvement for temporo-parietal areas in lexical and semantic processing. Thirty-two subjects (17 women) completed a lexical decision task and a semantic priming task while receiving 20 min of bilateral tDCS stimulation (right anodal/left cathodal or left anodal/right cathodal stimulation) or sham stimulation. We hypothesized that right anodal/left cathodal stimulation over temporo-parietal areas would selectively interrupt the typical lexical processing dominance of the left hemisphere and facilitate mediated priming, while left anodal/right cathodal stimulation would selectively facilitate lexical processing and direct priming. Results showed impaired lexical processing under right anodal/left cathodal stimulation in comparison with sham and left anodal/right cathodal stimulation. Results are discussed in light of previous findings and hemispheric lateralization models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andoh J, Artiges E, Pallier C, Rivière D, Mangin JF, PaillèreMartinot ML et al (2008) Priming frequencies of transcranial magnetic stimulation over Wernicke’s area modulate word detection. Cereb Cortex 18:210–216
Balota DA, Lorch RF Jr (1986) Depth of automatic spreading activation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 12:336–345
Beeman M, Chiarello C (1998) Right hemisphere language comprehension: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Beeman M, Friedman RB, Grafman J, Perez E, Diamond S, Lindsay MB (1994) Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. J Cogn Neurosci 6(1):26–45
Binder JR, McKiernan KA, Parsons ME, Westbury CF, Possing ET, Kaufman JN, Buchanan L (2003) Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 15:372–393
Bookheimer S (2002) Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:151–188
Chiarello C, Hoyer WJ (1988) Adult age differences in implicit and explicit memory: time course and coding effects. Psychol Aging 3:358–366
Chiarello C, Richards L (1992) Another look at categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 30:381–392
Floel A, Roesser N, Michka O, Knecht S, Breitenstein C (2008) Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1415–1422
Floel A, Meinzer M, Kirstein R, Nijhof S, Deppe M, Knecht S, Breitenstein C (2011) Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke 42(7):2065–2067
Gabrieli JDE, Desmond JE, Demb JB, Wagner AD, Stone MV, Vaidya CJ, Glover GH (1996) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of semantic memory processes in the frontal lobes. Psychol Sci 7(5):278–283
Hagoort P (1997) Semantic priming in Broca’s aphasics at a short SOA: no support for an automatic access deficit. Brain Lang 56(2):287–300
Iacoboni M, Zaidel E (1996) Hemispheric independence in word recognition: evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations. Brain Lang 53:121–140
Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M (2012) tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 216:1–10
Jung-Beeman M (2005) Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn Sci 9:512–518
Kiefer M, Weisbrod M, Kern I, Maier S, Spitzer M (1998) Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming. Brain Lang 64:377–408
Knecht S, Floel A, Drager B, Breitenstein C, Sommer J, Henningsen H, Ringelstein EB (2002) Degree of language lateralization determines susceptibility to unilateral brain lesions. Nat Neurosci 5(7):695–699
Koivisto M, Laine M (2000) Hemispheric asymmetries in activation and integration of categorical information. Laterality 5:1–21
Kuperberg GR, Deckersbach T, Holt DJ, Goff D, West WC (2007) Increased temporal and prefrontal activity in response to semantic associations in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:138–151
Lecardeur L, Giffard B, Laisney M, Brazo P, Delamillieure P, Eustache F, Dollfus S (2007) Semantic hyperpriming in schizophrenic patients: increased facilitation or impaired inhibition in semantic association processing? Schiz Res 89(1–3):243–250
Lieber L (1976) Lexical decisions in the right and left cerebral hemispheres. Brain Lang 3(3):443–450
Lindell AK (2006) In your right mind: right hemisphere contributions to language processing and production. Neuropsychol Rev 16(3):131–148
Massaro DW, Jones RD, Lipscomb C, Scholz R (1978) Role of prior knowledge on naming and lexical decisions with good and poor stimulus information. J Exp Psychol Learn 4(5):498–512
McNamara TP (2005) Semantic priming. Psychology Press, New York
Mitchell RL, Crow TJ (2005) Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere? Brain 128:963–978
Mottaghy FM, Sparing R, Topper R (2006) Enhancing picture naming with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Behav Neurol 17:177–186
Nakagawa A (1991) Role of anterior and posterior attention networks in hemispheric asymmetries during lexical decisions. J Cogn Neurosci 3:313–321
Neely JH (1991) Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In: Besner D, Humphreys GW (eds) Basic processes in reading: visual word recognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 264–336
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(3):633–639
Pobric G, Mashal N, Faust M, Lavidor M (2008) The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: a TMS study. J Cogn Neurosci 20(1):170–181
Rossell SL, Bullmore ET, Williams SC, David AS (2001) Brain activation during automatic and controlled processing of semantic relations: a priming experiment using lexical-decision. Neuropsychologia 39(11):1167–1176
Rubinsten O, Anaki D, Henik A, Drori S, Faran Y (2005) Free association norms in the Hebrew language. In: Henik A, Rubinsten O, Anaki D (eds) Word norms in Hebrew. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, pp 17–34
Sass K, Krach S, Sachs O, Kircher T (2009) Lion–tiger–stripes: neural correlates of indirect semantic priming across processing modalities. NeuroImage 45(1):224–236
Thiel A, Haupt WF, Habedank B, Winhuisen L, Herholz K, Kessler J, Markowitsch HJ (2005) Neuroimaging-guided rTMS of the left inferior frontal gyrus interferes with repetition priming. NeuroImage 25(3):815–823
Tivarus ME, Ibinson JW, Hillier A, Schmalbrock P, Beversdorf DQ (2006) An fMRI study of semantic priming: modulation of brain activity by varying semantic distances. Cogn Behav Neurol 19(4):194–200
Weisbrod M, Maier S, Harig S, Himmelsbach U, Spitzer M (1998) Lateralised semantic and indirect priming effects in people with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 172:142–146
Whitney C, Kirk M, O’Sullivan J, Lambon Ralph MA, Jefferies E (2011) The neural organization of semantic control: TMS evidence for a distributed network in left inferior frontal and posterior middle temporal gyrus. Cereb Cortex 21(5):1066–1075
You DS, Kim DY, Chun MH, Jung SE, Park SJ (2011) Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke’s area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Cogn 119:1–5
Zouridakis G, Simos P, Breir J, Papanicolaou A (1998) Functional hemispheric asymmetry assessment in a visual language task using MEG. Brain Topogr 11(1):57–65
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Israeli Academy of Sciences grant no. 100/10, the Israeli Center of Research Excellence (I-CORE) in Cognition (I-CORE Program 51/11), and an ERC starting grant which was awarded to ML (Inspire 200512).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weltman, K., Lavidor, M. Modulating lexical and semantic processing by transcranial direct current stimulation. Exp Brain Res 226, 121–135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3416-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3416-5