Abstract
It has been proposed that the two hands play different roles during bimanual object interaction. The right hand takes on an explorative, highly precise, manipulative role while the left hand supports and stabilizes the object. Does this division of labour influence hand use during visually guided grasping? Three experiments were designed to address this question: right-handed individuals put together 3D models using big or small building blocks scattered across a tabletop. Participants were free to build the models; however, it felt comfortable (Experiment 1) or they were required to build on a large (Experiment 2) or small (Experiment 3) base plate. In Experiment 1, the right hand was preferred for grasping while the left hand stabilized the building model. When participants used the large base plate (Experiment 2), right hand use for grasping decreased and left hand use increased. The plate provided freedom to the left hand from having to stabilize the building model, but it also interfered with right/left hand movements directed towards the opposite side of the grasping hand (contralateral movements). To investigate which of these two factors would explain the change in hand use for grasping, a very small base plate was used in the last experiment. Results showed similar right hand use values to those seen in the first experiment (without the use of a plate), even though the left hand was ‘released from its stabilizing duties.’ The results predict a left-hemisphere right hand advantage in the control of grasping.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annett J, Annett M, Hudson PTW, Turner A (1979) The control of movement in the preferred and the non-preferred hands. Q J Exp Psychol 31:641–652
Bartolomeo P (2006) A parietofrontal network for spatial awareness in the right hemisphere of the human brain. Arch Neurol 63:1238–1241
Begliomini C, Nelini C, Caria A, Grodd W, Castiello U (2008) Cortical activations in humans grasp-related areas depend on hand used and handedness. PLoS ONE 3(10):e3388
Birtles D, Anker S, Atkinson J, Shellens R, Briscoe A, Mahoney M, Braddick O (2011) Bimanual strategies for object retrieval in infants and young children. Exp Brain Res 211:207–218
Bishop DVM (1996) The measurement of hand preference: a validation study comparing three groups of right-handers. Br J Psychol 81:269–285
Brown S, Roy E, Rohr L, Bryden P (2006) Using hand performance measures to predict handedness. Laterality 11:1–14
Bryden PJ, Roy EA (2006) Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. Dev Psychobiol 48:121–132
Bryden MP, Singh M, Steenhuis R, Clarkson KL (1994) A behavioral measure of hand preference as opposed to hand skill. Neuropsychologia 32:991–999
Buckingham G, Binsted G, Carey DP (2010) Bimanual reaching across the hemispace: which hand is yoked to which? Brain Cogn 74:341–346
Calvert GA, Bishop DV (1998) Quantifying hand preference using a behavioural continuum. Laterality 3:255–268
Carlier M, Doyen A-L, Lamard C (2006) Midline crossing: developmental trend from 3 to 10 years of age in a preferential card-reaching task. Brain Cogn 61:255–261
Fagard J, Lockman J (2005) The effect of task constraints on infants’ (bi)manual strategy for grasping and exploring objects. Infant Behav Dev 28:305–315
Fagard J, Marks A (2000) Unimanual and bimanual tasks and the assessment of handedness in toddlers. Dev Sci 3:137–147
Flament F (1975) Coordination et prevalence manuelle chez le nourisson. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
Gabbard C, Rabb C (2000) What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements? J Gen Psychol 127:178–184
Gabbard C, Iteya M, Rabb C (1997) A lateralized comparison of handedness and object proximity. J Gen Psychol 51:176–180
Gabbard C, Tapia M, Helbig CR (2003) Task complexity and limb selection in reaching. Int J Neurosci 113:143–153
Gonzalez CL, Goodale MA (2009) Hand preference for precision grasping predicts language lateralization. Neuropsychologia 47:3182–3189
Gonzalez CL, Ganel T, Goodale MA (2006) Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. J Neurophysiol 95:3496–3501
Gonzalez CL, Whitwell RL, Morrissey B, Ganel T, Goodale MA (2007) Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping. Exp Brain Res 182:275–279
Goodale M (1988) Hemispheric asymmetries in motor control. Behav Brain Res 30:203–214
Guiard Y (1987) Assymetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav 19:486–517
Haaland KY, Prestopnik JL, Knighy RT, Lee RR (2004) Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain 127:1145–1158
Hopkins WD (1995) Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task in 110 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): cross-sectional analysis. J Comp Psychol 103:291–297
Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Kritikos A (1999) Attention for action: coordination of bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. Br J Psychol 90:247–270
Janssen L, Meulenbrock RGJ, Steenbergen B (2011) Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning. Exp Brain Res 209:65–72
Johansson RS, Theorin A, Westling G, Andersson M, Ohki Y et al (2006) How a lateralized brain supports symmetrical bimanual tasks. PLoS Biol 4:e158
Kazennikov O, Perrig S, Wiesendanger M (2002) Kinematics of a coordinated goal-directed bimanual task. Behav Brain Res 134:83–91
Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:229–238
MacNeilage PF (1987) The evolution of hemispheric specialization for manual function and language. In: Wise SP (ed) Higher brain functions. Wiley, New York, pp 285–309
Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Bryden PJ, Rohr LE (2004) The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches. Brain Cogn 55:349–351
Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Bryden PJ, Rohr LE (2005) The performance of left-handed participants on a preferential reaching test. Brain Cogn 57:143–145
Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Rohr LE, Bryden PJ (2006) Reaching patterns across working space: the effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels. Laterality 11:465–492
Mason A (2008) Coordination and control of bimanual prehension: effects of perturbing object location. Exp Brain Res 188:125–139
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Perrig S, Kazennikov O, Wiesendanger M (1999) Time structure of a goal-directed bimanual skill and its dependence on task constraints. Behav Brain Res 103:95–104
Rogow SM (1987) The ways of the hand: a study of hand function among blind, visually impaired and visually impaired multi-handicapped children and adolescents. Br J Vis Impair 5:59–61
Sacrey LR, Karl JM, Whishaw IQ (2012) Development of rotational movements, hand shaping, and accuracy in advance and withdrawal for the reach-to-eat movement in human infants aged 6 to 12 months. Infant Behav Dev 35:543–560
Serrien DJ, Ivry RB, Swinnen SP (2006) Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:160–167
Steenhuis RE, Bryden MP (1999) The relation between hand preference and hand performance: what you get depends on what you measure. Laterality 4:2–26
Theorin A, Johansson RS (2010) Selection of prime actor in humans during bimanual object manipulation. J Neurosci 30:10448–10459
Vallar G (1997) Spatial frames of reference and somatosensory processing: a neuropsychological perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:1401–1409
Vogel JL, Bowers CA, Vogel DS (2003) Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Brain Cogn 52:197–204
Wang J, Sainburg RL (2007) The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Exp Brain Res 178:565–570
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stone, K.D., Bryant, D.C. & Gonzalez, C.L.R. Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?. Exp Brain Res 224, 455–467 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3325-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3325-z