Skip to main content
Log in

Default motor preparation under conditions of response uncertainty

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a choice reaction time (RT) paradigm, providing partial advance information (a precue) about the upcoming response has been shown to decrease RT, presumably due to preprogramming of the precued parameters. When advance information about a particular aspect of a movement is provided (precued), several different strategies might be used to prepare the motor system during the foreperiod. For example, in studies where response preparation time was manipulated, precues were provided specifying the required arm and direction but movement amplitude was left uncertain. In this case it was shown that a default movement was preprogrammed whose amplitude was intermediate between the alternatives (Favilla et al. in Exp Brain Res 75(2):280–294, 1989, Exp Brain Res 79(3):530–538, 1990; Ghez et al. in Exp Brain Res 115(2):217–233, 1997). However, this strategy did not appear to be used in a RT task since there was an absence of online adjustments to movement. Therefore, it appeared movements were not initiated until all parameters had been correctly specified and programmed by the nervous system (Bock and Arnold in Exp Brain Res 90:(1):209–216, 1992). The present study reinvestigated the notion of a default movement preparation strategy in a choice RT paradigm, employing the triggering effect of a startling acoustic stimulus. On control trials (80 dB imperative stimulus), the movements were initiated toward the correct targets. Providing a startle stimulus (124 dB) resulted in the early initiation of a “default” movement whose amplitude fell in between the potential response alternatives. Thus, the current experiment found behavioral evidence of default intermediate-amplitude movement preparation as a strategy under conditions of response amplitude uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bock O, Arnold K (1992) Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets. Exp Brain Res 90(1):209–216. doi:10.1007/bf00229273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2004a) Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? Exp Brain Res 159(3):301–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2004b) Prepared movements are elicited early by startle. J Mot Behav 36(3):253–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen AN, Chua R, Summers JJ, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2009) Precues enable multiple response preprogramming: evidence from startle. Psychophysiology 46(2):241–251. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00764.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen AN, Maslovat D, Lam MY, Chua R, Franks IM (2011) Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(3):366–376. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen AN, Maslovat D, Franks IM (in press) Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle. Clin Neurophysiol

  • Elliott D, Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R (1991) Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming. Hum Mov Sci 10(4):393–418. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90013-n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M, Hening W, Ghez C (1989) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. Exp Brain Res 75(2):280–294. doi:10.1007/bf00247934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M, Gordon J, Hening W, Ghez C (1990) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. Exp Brain Res 79(3):530–538. doi:10.1007/bf00229322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Favilla M, Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Bermejo R, Pullman S (1997) Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories. Exp Brain Res 115(2):217–233. doi:10.1007/pl00005692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D, Kelso JS (1980) Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. J Exp Psychol Gen 109(4):475–495. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.4.475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC (1989) Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behav Brain Sci 12:189–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp ST (1996) Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In: Zelaznik HN (ed) Advances in motor learning and control. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 13–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumru H, Urra X, Compta Y, Castellote JM, Turbau J, Valls-Solé J (2006) Excitability of subcortical motor circuits in Go/no Go and forced choice reaction time tasks. Neurosci Lett 406:66–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Gottlieb GL (1991) An equilibrium-point model for fast, single-joint movement: similarity of single-joint isometric and isotonic descending commands. J Mot Behav 23(3):179–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maslovat D, Hodges NJ, Chua R, Franks IM (2011) Motor preparation and the effects of practice: evidence from startle. Behav Neurosci (Advance online publication). doi:10.1037/a0022567

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslovat D, Hodges NJ, Chua R, Franks IM (in press) Motor preparation of spatially and temporally defined movements: evidence from startle. J Neurophysiol

  • Nijhuis LBO, Janssen L, Bloem BR, Van Dijk JG, Gielen SC, Borm GF, Overeem S (2007) Choice reaction times for human head rotations are shortened by startling acoustic stimuli, irrespective of stimulus direction. J Physiol 584(1):97–109. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RF, Day BL (2007) Fast visuomotor processing made faster by sound. J Physiol 583(3):1107–1115. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol Gen 109(4):444–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valls-Solé J, Rothwell JC, Goulart F, Cossu G, Muñoz E (1999) Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans. J Physiol 516(3):931–938. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0931u.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valls-Solé J, Kumru H, Kofler M (2008) Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans. Exp Brain Res 187(4):497–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wadman WJ, Dernier van der Gon JJ, Geuze RH, Mol CR (1979) Control of fast goal-directed arm movements. J Hum Mov Stud 5:3–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) awarded to I.M.F. and an NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Award (USRA) conferred to C.J.F. We would like to thank Dr. Digby Elliott and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian M. Franks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forgaard, C.J., Maslovat, D., Carlsen, A.N. et al. Default motor preparation under conditions of response uncertainty. Exp Brain Res 215, 235–245 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2893-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2893-7

Keywords

Navigation