Abstract
We investigated the tactile cuing of visual spatial attention using spatially-informative (75% valid) and spatially-noninformative (25% valid) tactile cues. The participants performed a visual change detection task following the presentation of a tactile spatial cue on their back whose location corresponded to one of the four visual quadrants on a computer monitor. The participants were explicitly instructed to use the spatially-informative tactile cues but to ignore the spatially-noninformative cues. In addition to reaction time data, participants’ eye-gaze was monitored as a measure of overt visual attention. The results showed that the spatially-informative tactile cues resulted in initial saccades toward the cued visual quadrants, and significantly reduced the visual change detection latencies. When spatially-noninformative tactile cues were used, the participants were largely successful at ignoring them as indicated by a saccade distribution that was independent of the quadrant that was cued, as well as the lack of a significant change in search time as compared to the baseline measure of no tactile cuing. The eye-gaze data revealed that the participants could not always completely ignore the spatially-noninformative tactile cues. Our results suggest that the tactile cuing of visual attention is natural but not automatic when the tactile cue and visual target are not collocated spatially, and that it takes effort to ignore the cues even when they are known to provide no useful information. In addition, our results confirm previous findings that spatially-informative tactile cues are especially effective at directing overt visual attention to locations that are not typically monitored visually, such as the bottom of a computer screen or the rearview mirror in an automobile.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews T, Coppola D (1999) Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vis Res 39:2947–2953
Auvray M, Gallace A, Tan HZ, Spence C (2007) Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch. Acta Psychol 126:79–97
Bolognini N, Frassinetti F, Serino A, Làdavas E (2005) “Acoustical vision” of below threshold stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs. Exp Brain Res 160:273–282
Chica A, Sanabria D, Lupiáñez J, Spence C (2007) Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention. Exp Brain Res 179:353–364
Enriquez MJ, MacLean KE (2004) Impact of haptic warning signal reliability in a time-and-safety-critical task. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environments and teleoperator systems, pp 407–414
Eramudugolla R, Irvine DRF, McAnally KI, Martin RL, Mattingley JB (2005) Directed attention eliminates ‘change deafness’ in complex auditory scenes. Curr Biol 15:1108–1113
Fitch GM, Kiefer RJ, Hankey JM, Kleiner BM (2007) Toward developing an approach for alerting drivers to the direction of a crash threat. Hum Factors 49:710–720
Fujawa GE, Strybel TZ (1997) The effects of cue informativeness and signal amplitude on auditory spatial facilitation of visual search performance. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 41st annual meeting. human factors and ergonomics society, Santa Monica, pp 556–560
Gallace A, Tan HZ, Spence C (2006) The failure to detect tactile change: a tactile analogue of visual change blindness. Psychonomic Bull Rev 13:300–303
Gray R, Tan HZ (2002) Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision. Exp Brain Res 145:50–55
Ho C, Tan HZ, Spence C (2005) Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 8:397–412
Ho C, Tan HZ, Spence C (2006) The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention. Ergonomics 49:724–738
Jones CM, Young JJ, Gray R, Spence C, Tan HZ (2007) An eyetracker study of the haptic cuing of visual attention. In: Proceedings of the 2007 World Haptics Conference (WHC07): the second joint EuroHaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, pp 557–558
Kennett S, Eimer M, Spence C, Driver J (2001) Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs. J Cogn Neurosci 13:462–478
Kennett S, Spence C, Driver J (2002) Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Percept Psychophys 64:1083–1094
Klein R (1980) Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? In: Nickerson RS (Ed) Attention and performance VIII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 259–276
Kowler E, Anderson E, Dosher B, Blaser B (1995) The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vis Res 35:1897–1916
McDonald JJ, Teder-Sälejärvi WA, Heraldez D, Hillyard SA (2001) Electrophysiological evidence for the “missing link” in crossmodal attention. Can J Exp Psychol 55:143–151
Perrott DR, Cisneros J, McKinley RL, D’Angelo WR (1996) Aurally aided visual search under virtual and free-field listening conditions. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 38:702–715
Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2004) Attention and displays. In: Johnson A, Proctor RW (Eds) Attention: theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 227–259
Remington RW (1980) Attention and saccadic eye movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 6:726–744
Rensink RA (2000) Visual search for change: a probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cogn 7:345–376
Rorden C, Driver J (1999) Does auditory attention shift in the direction of an upcoming saccade? Neuropsychologia 37:357–377
Rorden C, Greene K, Sasine GM, Baylis GC (2002) Enhanced tactile performance at the destination of an upcoming saccade. Curr Biol 12:1429–1434
Rudmann DS, Strybel TZ (1999) Auditory spatial facilitation of visual search performance: effect of cue precision and distractor density. Hum Factors 41:146–160
Santangelo V, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Spence C (2007) The suppression of reflexive visual and auditory orienting when attention is otherwise engaged. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:137–148
Santangelo V, Spence C (2007) Assessing the automaticity of the exogenous orienting of tactile attention. Perception 36:1497–1505
Simons DJ, Ambinder MS (2005) Change blindness: theory and consequences. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 14:44–48
Simons DJ, Levin DT (1998) Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bull Rev 5:644–649
Simons DJ, Rensink RA (2005) Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn Sci 9:16–20
Sivak M (1996) The information that drivers use: is it indeed 90% visual? Perception 25:1081–1089
Spence C (2001) Crossmodal attentional capture: a controversy resolved? In: Folk C, Gibson B (Eds) Attention, distraction and action: multiple perspectives on attentional capture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 231–262
Spence C, Driver J (1997a) Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Percept Psychophys 59:1–22
Spence C, Driver J (1997b) Cross-modal links in attention between audition, vision, and touch: implications for interface design. Int J Cogn Ergon 1:351–373
Spence C, Driver J (eds) (2004) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Spence C, Ho C (2008) Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving. Theor Issues Ergon Sci (in press)
Spence C, McDonald J, Driver J (2004) Chap. 11 Exogenous spatial-cueing studies of human crossmodal attention and multisensory integration. In: Spence C, Driver J (eds) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 277–320
Spence C, Nicholls MER, Gillespie N, Driver J (1998) Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Percept Psychophys 60:544–557
Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2000) Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1298–1319
Stelmach LB, Campsall JM, Herdman CM (1997) Attentional and ocular movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:823–844
Strybel TZ, Bertolotti H (2005) The effects of audio spatial cue precision on target detection and identification. In: Proceedings of human computer interaction international 2005. Published on CD
Tan HZ, Gray R, Young JJ, Traylor R (2003) A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing Haptics-e: Elect J Haptics Res 3:1–20
Tassinari G, Campara D (1996) Consequences of covert orienting to non-informative stimuli of different modalities: a unitary mechanism? Neuropsychologia 34:235–245
Verrillo RT, Gescheider GA (1992) Perception via the sense of touch. In: Summers IR (ed) Tactile aids for the hearing impaired. Whurr Publishers, London, pp 1–36
Vitevitch MS (2003) Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:333–342
Vu K-PL, Strybel TZ, Proctor RW (2006) Effects of displacement magnitude and direction of auditory cues on auditory spatial facilitation of visual search. Hum Factors 48:587–599
Ward LM, McDonald JJ, Lin D (2000) On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting. Percept Psychophys 62:1258–1264
Young JJ, Tan HZ, Gray R (2003) Validity of haptic cues and its effect on priming visual spatial attention. In: Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, pp 166–170
Acknowledgments
This research was partly funded by a National Science Foundation Award under Grant No. 0533908, a grant from the Purdue Research Foundation, and a grant from the Chinese Natural Sciences Foundation under Grant No. 30428016. A brief summary of this work was presented in the form of an abstract and a poster at the World Haptics Conference in Tsukuba, Japan, March 22–24, 2007 (Jones et al. 2007). The authors wish to thank J. Jay Young for his assistance. The comments from Dr. Roger Cholewiak and an anonymous reviewer on an earlier version of the manuscript are greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, C.M., Gray, R., Spence, C. et al. Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues. Exp Brain Res 186, 659–669 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1277-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1277-0