Abstract
Eyes never stop moving. Even when asked to maintain the eyes at fixation, the oculomotor system produces small and rapid eye movements called microsaccades, at a frequency of about 1.5–2 s−1. The frequency of microsaccades changes when a stimulus is presented in the visual field, showing a stereotyped response pattern consisting of an early inhibition of microsaccades followed by a rebound, before the baseline is reached again. Although this pattern of response has generally been considered as a sort of oculomotor reflex, directional biases in microsaccades have been recently linked to the orienting of spatial attention. In the present study, we show for the first time that regardless of any spatial bias, the pattern of absolute microsaccadic frequency is different for oddball stimuli compared to that elicited by standard stimuli. In a visual-oddball task, the oddball stimuli caused an initial prolonged inhibition of microsaccades, particularly when oddballs had to be explicitly recognized and remembered. The present findings suggest that high-order cognitive processes, other than spatial attention, can influence the frequency of microsaccades. Finally, we also introduce a new method for exploring the visual system response to oddball stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardekani BA, Choi SJ, Hossein-Zadeh GA, Bernice P, Tanabe JL, Lim KO, Bilder R, Helpern JA, Begleiter H (2002) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of brain activity in the visual oddball task. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14:347–356
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:289–300
Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 29:1165–1188
Betta E, Turatto M (2006) Are you ready? I can tell by looking at your microsaccades. Neuroreport 17:1001–1004
Bridgeman B (1998) Durations of stimuli displayed on video display terminals: (n−1)/f+persistence. Psychol Sci 9:232–233
Donchin E, Coles MG (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 11:347–427
Engbert R, Kliegl R (2003) Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Res 43:1035–1045
Engbert R, Mergenthaler K (2006) Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7192–7197
Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:1030–1044
Galfano G, Betta E, Turatto M (2004) Inhibition of return in microsaccades. Exp Brain Res 159:400–404
Hafed ZM, Clark JJ (2002) Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts. Vision Res 42:2533–2545
Huerta MF, Harting JK (1984) Connectional organization of the superior colliculus. Trends Neurosci 7:286–289
Ives HE (1912) On heterocromatic photometry. Philos Mag 24:845–853
Kok A (2001) On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38:557–577
Laubrock J, Engbert R, Kliegl R (2005) Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention. Vision Res 45:721–730
Lavie N (1995) Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:451–468
Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1998) Microsaccades differentially modulate neural activity in the striate and extrastriate visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 123:341–345
Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Hubel DH (2000) Microsaccadic eye movements and firing of single cells in the striate cortex of macaque monkeys. Nat Neurosci 3:251–258
Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Hubel DH (2004) The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:229–240
Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Troncoso XG, Dyar TA (2006) Microsaccades counteract visual fading during fixation. Neuron 49:297–305
Mazza V, Turatto M, Sarlo M (2005) Rare stimuli or rare changes: what really matters for the brain? Neuroreport 16:1061–1064
McPeek RM, Keller EL (2004) Deficits in saccade target selection after inactivation of superior colliculus. Nat Neurosci 7:757–763
Møller F, Laursen ML, Tygesen J, Sjølie AK (2002) Binocular quantification and characterization of microsaccades. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:765–770
Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mäntysalo S (1978) Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 42:313–329
Pazo-Alvarez P, Cadaveira F, Amenedo E (2003) MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol Psychol 63:199–236
Potts GF (2004) An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Brain Cogn 56:5–13
Rolfs M, Engbert R, Kliegl R (2004) Microsaccade orientation supports attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral cue. Psychol Sci 15:705–707
Rolfs M, Engbert R, Kliegl R (2005) Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition. Exp Brain Res 166:427–439
Rolfs M, Laubrock J, Kliegl R (2006) Shortening and prolongation of saccade latencies following microsaccades. Exp Brain Res 169:369–376
Schall JD (1995) Neural basis of saccade target selection. Rev Neurosci 6:63–85
Sparks DL, Nelson JS (1987) Sensory and motor maps in the mammalian superior colliculus. Trends Neurosci 10:312–317
Steinman RM, Haddad GM, Skavenski AA, Wyman D (1973) Miniature eye movement. Science 181:810–819
Stevens AA, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Gore JC (2000) Event-related fMRI of auditory and visual oddball tasks. Magn Reson Imaging 18:495–502
Zuber BL, Stark L, Cook G (1965) Microsaccades and the velocity–amplitude relationship for saccadic eye movements. Science 150:1459–1460
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valsecchi, M., Betta, E. & Turatto, M. Visual oddballs induce prolonged microsaccadic inhibition. Exp Brain Res 177, 196–208 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0665-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0665-6