Skip to main content
Log in

Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four experiments addressed the role of cast shadows of the body in orienting tactile spatial attention to the body itself. We used a modified spatial-cueing paradigm to examine whether viewing of the cast shadow of a hand can elicit spatial shifts of tactile attention to that very same hand. Participants performed a speeded tactile-discrimination task (thumb versus index finger, regardless of touched hand), while viewing the shadow of either the touched or untouched hand cast in front of them by a lateral light-source. The hand casting the shadow changed either between blocks (expt 1) or unpredictably within each block (expts 2–4). In experiments 1 and 2 tactile targets were preceded by central non-informative visual cues delivered near the shadow of the index finger and thumb. Despite the fact that cast shadows were always task-irrelevant and non-predictive of which hand was stimulated, tactile discrimination was consistently faster at the hand casting the shadow than at the other hand. This effect was not modulated by the duration of cue-target asynchrony, nor did it depend on whether the visual cue was present or not (expt 3). In addition, it was still reliable when vision of the hands was precluded, whereas it became inconsistent when the cast shadow of the hand was replaced by the cast shadow of an object (expt 4). Our results suggest that body shadows can induce a long-lasting capture of tactile attention for stimuli at the body itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To examine whether validity effect changed across time during the object-shadow experimental blocks, we analysed the first and the second halves of each block separately. For simplicity (and also in consideration of a potential speed-accuracy trade-off in this data set) we calculated a combined measure of RTs and accuracy known as inverse efficiency (IE) as the mean RT divided by the proportion of trials correct (Spence et al. 2001; Townsend and Ashby 1983). Mean IE scores for each participant were submitted to an ANOVA with two within-participants factors: trials (first versus second halves) and Validity (valid versus invalid). This ANOVA revealed a two-way interaction [F(1,15)=5.506, MSe=896.229, P=0.03], caused by larger (and positive) validity effect for the trials belonging to second (mean=19, SE=9) than first halves of the object-shadow blocks (mean=−16, SE=10). This may constitute preliminary evidence that a validity effect for object-shadow can build up over time.

References

  • Astafiev SV, Stanley CM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M (2004) Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nat Neurosci 7:542–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfiglioli C, Pavani F, Castiello U (2004) Differential effects of cast shadows on perception and action. Perception 33:1291–1304

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U (2001) Implicit processing of shadows. Vision Res 41:2305–2309

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Lusher D, Burton C, Disler P (2003) Shadows in the brain. J Cogn Neurosci 15:862–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheal ML, Lyon DR (1991) Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Q J Exp Psychol 43A:859–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing PE, Jiang J, Shuman M, Kanwisher N (2001) A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293:2470–2473

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnè A, Ladavas E (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 11:1645–1649

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen CK, Kingstone A (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive cue gaze. Psychon Bull Rev 5:490–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen CK, Kingstone A (2003) Abrupt onsets and gaze direction cues trigger independent reflexive attentional effects. Cognition 87:B1–B10

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • George N, Driver J, Dolan RJ (2001) Seen gaze-direction modulates fusiform activity and its coupling with other brain areas during face processing. Neuroimage 13:1102–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Taylor-Clarke M, Kennett S (2003) Tactile perception, cortical representation and the bodily self. Curr Biol 13:170–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Hietanen JK (2002) Social attention orienting integrates visual information from head and body orientation. Psychol Res 66:174–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C (2004) Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neurosci Lett 372:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun M (1997) The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for the perception of faces. J Neurosci 17:4302–4311

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett S, Taylor-Clarke M, Haggard P (2001) Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Curr Biol 11:1188–1191

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten D, Knill DC, Mamassian P, Bulthoff I (1996) Illusory motion from shadows. Nature 379:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten D, Mamassian P, Knill DC (1997) Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception 26:171–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone A, Smilek D, Ristic J, Friesen CK, Eastwood JD (2003) Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 12:176–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RM (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends Cogn Sci 4:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton SRH (2000) The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction. Q J Exp Psychol 53A:825–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupiáñez J, Milan EG, Tornay FJ, Madrid E, Tudela P (1997) Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Percept Psychophys 59:1241–1254

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamassian P, Knill DC, Kersten D (1998) The perception of cast shadows. Trends Cogn Sci 2:288–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visuo-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39:580–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J (2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83:B25–B34

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavani F, Castiello U (2004) Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows. Nat Neurosci 7:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J (2000) Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 11:353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention and performance X. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 531–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders AF (1975) The foreperiod effect revisited. Q J Exp Psychol 27A:591–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, McGlone F (2001) Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention. Exp Brain Res 141:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Nicholls MER, Gillespie N, Driver J (1998) Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Percept Psychophys 60:544–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Lloyd D, McGlone F, Nicholls MER, Driver J (2000) Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Exp Brain Res 134:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Kettenmann B, Kobal G, McGlone FP (2001) Shared attentional resources for processing visual and chemosensory information. Q J Exp Psychol 54A:775–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2004) Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:148–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassinari G, Campara D (1996) Consequences of covert orienting to non-informative stimuli of different modalities: A unitary mechanism? Neuropsychologia 34:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend JT, Ashby FG (1983) The stochastical modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turatto M, Benso F, Galfano G, Umiltà C (2002) Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:628–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Turatto M, Galfano G, Bridgeman B, Umiltà C (2004) Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems. Exp Brain Res 155:301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis S (1993) Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:676–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonas A, Goldsmith LT, Hallstrom JL (1978) Development of sensitivity to information provided by cast shadows in pictures. Perception 7:333–341

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Giuliano Miotto for technical support, to Maurizio Dal Bosco and Claudia Bonfiglioli for help with artwork, and to Gianluca Godino for help with data collection. We also thank Nicholas Holmes, Salvador Soto-Faraco, and an anonymous reviewer for their excellent comments on a previous draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Galfano.

Additional information

Preliminary results of this study were reported at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the International Multisensory Research Forum (Sitges, Spain), June 2004.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galfano, G., Pavani, F. Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows. Exp Brain Res 166, 518–527 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2392-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2392-9

Keywords

Navigation