Abstract
We have studied a neurodynamic model of cross-modal and cross-temporal associations. We show that a network of integrate-and-fire neurons can generate spiking activity with realistic dynamics during the delay period of a paired associates task. In particular, the activity of the model resembles reported data from single-cell recordings in the prefrontal cortex.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amit DJ (1995) The hebbian paradigm reintegrated: local reverberations as internal representations. Behav Brain Sci 18:617–657
Amit DJ, Brunel N (1997) Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 7:237–252
Amit DJ, Mongillo G (2003) Selective delay activity in the cortex: phenomena and interpretation. Cereb Cortex 13:1139–1150
Asaad WF, Rainer G, Miller EK (1998) Neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during associative learning. Neuron 21:1399–1407
Brunel N (2003) Dynamics and plasticity of stimulus-selective persistent activity in cortical network models. Cereb Cortex 13:1151–1161
Brunel N, Wang XJ (2001) Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical network model of object working memory dominated by recurrent inhibition. J Comput Neurosci 11:63–85
Dayan P, Abbott L (2001) Theoretical neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge
Deco G, Rolls ET (2004a) A neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition. Vision Res 44:621–642
Deco G, Rolls ET (2004b) Synaptic and spiking dynamics underlying reward reversal in the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex (in press)
Deco G, Rolls ET, Horwitz B (2004) “What” and “where” in visual working memory: a computational neurodynamical perspective for integrating and single-neuron data. J Cogn Neurosci 16:683–701
Erickson CA, Desimone R (1999) Responses of macaque perirhinal neurons during and after visual stimulus association learning. J Neurosci 19:10404–10416
Fuster JM (1997) The prefrontal cortex. Lippincott–Raven, Philadelphia
Fuster JM, Bodner M, Kroger JK (2000) Cross-modal and cross-temporal association in neurons of frontal cortex. Nature 405:347–351
Miyashita Y, Hayashi T (2000) Neural representation of visual objects: encoding and top-down activation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:187–194
Mongillo G, Amit DJ, Brunel N (2003) Retrospective and prospective persistent activity induced by Hebbian learning in a recurrent cortical network. Eur J Neurosci 18:2011–2024
Naya Y, Sakai K, Miyashita Y (1996) Activity of primate inferotemporal neurons related to a sought target in pair-association task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:2664–2669
Naya Y, Yoshida M, Takeda M, Fujimichi R, Miyashita Y (2003) Delay-period activities in two subdivisions of monkey inferotemporal cortex during pair association memory task. Eur J Neurosci 18:2915–2918
Rainer G, Rao SC, Miller EK (1999) Prospective coding for objects in primate prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 19:5493–5505
Renart A, Song P, Wang XJ (2003) Robust spatial working memory through homeostatic synaptic scaling in heterogeneous cortical networks. Neuron 38:473–485
Thorpe SJ, Rolls ET, Maddison S (1983) The orbitofrontal cortex: neuronal activity in the behaving monkey. Exp Brain Res 49:93–115
White IM, Wise SP (1999) Rule-dependent neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res 126:315–335
Zhou YD, Fuster JM (2000) Visuo-tactile cross-modal associations in cortical somatosensory cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9777–9782
Acknowledgements
Gustavo Deco was supported by Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA). Rita Almeida was supported by a Marie Curie Individual Fellowship, QLK6-CT-2002-51439.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
We used the mathematical formulation of the IF neurons and synaptic currents described in Brunel and Wang (2001). Here we provide a brief summary of their framework. The dynamics of the sub-threshold membrane potential V of a neuron are given by the equation:
where Cm is the membrane capacitance, taken to be 0.5 nF for excitatory neurons and 0.2 nF for inhibitory neurons; gm is the membrane leak conductance, taken to be 25 nS for excitatory neurons and 20 nS for inhibitory neurons; VL is the resting potential of −70 mV and Isyn is the synaptic current. The firing threshold is taken to be Vthr=−50 mV and the reset potential Vreset=−55 mV.
The synaptic current is given by a sum of glutamatergic, AMPA (IAMPA,rec) and NMDA (INMDA,rec) mediated, recurrent excitatory currents, one AMPA (IAMPA,ext) mediated external excitatory current, and one inhibitory GABAergic current (IGABA):
The currents are defined by:
where V E =0 mV, V I =−70 mV, w j are the synaptic weights, s j the fractions of open channels for the different receptors, and g the synaptic conductances for the different channels. The NMDA synaptic current depends on the membrane potential and is controlled by the extracellular concentration of magnesium ([Mg2+]=1 mmol L−1). The values for the synaptic conductances for excitatory neurons are gAMPA,ext=2.08 nS, gAMPA, rec=0.104 nS, gNMDA=0.327 nS, and gGABA=1.25 nS and for inhibitory neurons gAMPA,ext=1.62 nS, gAMPA,rec=0.081 nS, gNMDA=0.258 nS, and gGABA=0.973 nS. These values are the same as in Brunel and Wang (2001). In their work the conductances were calculated so that in an unstructured network the excitatory neurons have a spontaneous spiking rate of 3 Hz and the inhibitory neurons a spontaneous rate of 9 Hz. The fractions of open channels are described by:
where τNMDA,decay, =100 ms, is the decay time for NMDA synapses, τAMPA, =2 ms, the decay time for AMPA synapses, and τGABA, =10 ms, the decay time for GABA synapses; τNMDA,rise, =2 ms, is the rise time for NMDA synapses (the rise times for AMPA and GABA are neglected because they are smaller than 1 ms) and α=0.5 ms−1. The sums over k represent a sum over spikes formulated as δ-Peaks (δ(t)) emitted by presynaptic neuron j at time t k j . The equations were integrated numerically using the second order Runge–Kutta method with step size 0.05 ms.
Appendix 2
The mean-field approximation used in this work was derived from Brunel and Wang 2001, assuming that the network of integrate-and-fire neurons is in a stationary state. In this formulation the potential of a neuron is calculated as:
where V(t) is the membrane potential, x labels the populations, τ x is the effective membrane time constant, μ x is the mean value the membrane potential would have in the absence of spiking and fluctuations, σ x measures the magnitude of the fluctuations, and η is a Gaussian process with absolute exponentially decaying correlation function with time constant τAMPA. The quantities μ x and σ 2 x are given by:
where wI,x are the weights from the inhibitory neurons to the pool x, ν ext is the external impinging spiking rate (including spontaneously activity and eventually external stimuli or attentional bias), ν I is the population-averaged spiking rate of the inhibitory pool, τ m =C m /g m with the values for the excitatory or inhibitory neurons depending on the pool considered, and the other quantities are given by:
where p is the number of excitatory pools, f x is the fraction of neurons in the excitatory x pool, wj,x the weight of the connections from pool x to pool j, ν x is the population-averaged spiking rate of the x excitatory pool, γ=1/3.57, β=0.062 and the average membrane potential 〈V x 〉 has a value between −55 mV and −50 mV.
The spiking rate of a pool as a function of the defined quantities is then given by:
where
where erf(u) is the error function and τrp the refractory period, which is regarded as 2 ms for excitatory neurons and 1 ms for inhibitory neurons. To solve the equations defined by Eq. (2) for all values of x we integrate Eq. (1) numerically and the differential equation below, describing a fake dynamics of the system, which has fixed point solutions corresponding to Eqs. (2):
For all simulation periods studied, the mean-field equations, Eqs. (1) and (3) were integrated using the Euler method with step size 0.1 and 4,000 iterations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deco, G., Ledberg, A., Almeida, R. et al. Neural dynamics of cross-modal and cross-temporal associations. Exp Brain Res 166, 325–336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2374-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2374-y