Skip to main content
Log in

The neural control of single degree-of-freedom elbow movements

Effect of starting joint position

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is known that muscle activation patterns are changed when the force requirements of a task are increased (e.g., moving a heavier inertial load) or when the available muscle force is reduced (e.g., by inducing muscle fatigue). It is not known whether this is true when the torque-producing capability of a muscle is altered. Eight neurologically healthy subjects performed flexion and extension maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVC) at five different joint positions (10°, 40°, 70°, 100°, and 130°, where 0° is full elbow extension). Flexion MVC increased by 138% and extension MVC increased by 74% as the elbow joint position changed from the most extended to the most flexed position tested. The same subjects then made rapid, 30° elbow flexion movements from each of four starting elbow positions (10°, 40°, 70°, and 100°). Muscle activation patterns for movements made from the more extended positions showed an increased first agonist burst duration and increased latency of the antagonist burst. There was no change in the initial rate of rise of the agonist burst across starting joint positions. Movements made from the most extended starting position were significantly slower and had longer acceleration and deceleration times than did movements made from the more flexed starting positions. The changes in muscle activation patterns were consistent with those seen when the force requirements of a task are increased or the available muscle force is reduced. We hypothesize that a fall in the ratio of available to required muscle forces causes the nervous system to change muscle activation patterns, to increase the ratio. Our results are consistent with this hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A, B.
Fig. 2A–E.
Fig. 3A–D.
Fig. 4A, B.
Fig. 5A, B.
Fig. 6A, B.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An KN, Hui FC, Morrey BF, Linscheid RL, Chao EY (1981) Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. J Biomech 14:659–669

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive, their functions revealed by electromyography, 5th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp 61–64

  • Brown SHC, Cooke JD (1981) Amplitude- and instruction-dependent modulation of movement-related electromyogram activity in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 316:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheron G, Godaux E (1986) Self-terminated fast movement of the forearm in man: amplitude dependence of the triple burst pattern. J Biophys Biomec 10:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcos DM, Jiang HY, Wilding J, Gottlieb GL (2002) Fatigue induced changes in phasic muscle activation patterns for fast elbow flexion movements. Exp Brain Res 142:1-12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day BL, Marsden CD (1982) Accurate repositioning of the human thumb against unpredictable dynamic loads is dependent upon peripheral feedback. J Physiol (Lond) 327:393–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget R, Lamarre Y (1987) Rapid elbow flexion in the absence of proprioceptive and cutaneous feedback. Hum Neurobiol 6:27–37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerilovsky L, Tsvetinov P, Trenkova G (1989) Peripheral effects on the amplitude of monopolar and bipolar H-reflex potentials from the soleus muscle. Exp Brain Res 76:173–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL (1996) On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 76:3207–3229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1980) Response to sudden torques about the ankle in man. III. Suppression of stretch-evoked responses during phasic contraction. J Neurophysiol 44:233–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC (1989a) Organizing principles for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy. J Neurophysiol 62:342–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC (1989b) Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behav Brain Sci 12:189–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC, Latash ML (1990) Organizing principles for single joint movements. III. Speed-insensitive strategy as a default. J Neurophysiol 63:625–636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Latash ML, Corcos DM, Liubinskas TJ, Agarwal GC (1992) Organizing principles for single joint movement. V. Agonist-antagonist interactions. J Neurophysiol 67:1417–1427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett M, Marsden CD (1979) Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 294:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett M, Shahani BT, Young RR (1975) EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:1154–1162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford B, Stark L (1985) Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal. Exp Neurol 90:619–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z, Enoka RM (1985) Isometric torque–angle relationship and movement-related activity of human elbow flexors: implications for the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Exp Brain Res 59:441–450

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DS, Strick PL (1989) Force requirements and patterns of muscle activity. Behav Brain Sci 12:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DS, Strick PL (1993) Step-tracking movements of the wrist. III. Influence of changes in load on patterns of muscle activity. J Neurosci 13:5212–5227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins EL, Gonzalez RV, Barr RE (1993) Comparison of experimental and analytical torque–angle relationships of the human elbow joint complex. Biomed Sci Instrum. 29:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Saunders JBCM, Feinstein B, Wright EW (1952) Relation of the human electromyogram to muscular tension. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 4:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S, Radovanovic S, Milanovic S, Ljubisavljevic M, Anastasijevic R (1997) A comparison of the effects of agonist and antagonist muscle fatigue on performance of rapid movements. Eur J Appl Physiol 76:41–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskolski A, Kisiel K, Adach Z, Jaskolska A (2000) The influence of elbow joint angle on different phases of force development during maximal voluntary contraction. Can J Appl Physiol 25:453–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (1994) Control of fast elbow movement: a study of electromyographic patterns during movements against unexpectedly decreased inertial load. Exp Brain Res 98:145–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee RG, Lucier GE, Mustard BE, White DG (1986) Modification of motor output to compensate for unanticipated load conditions during rapid voluntary movements. Can J Neurol Sci 13:97–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leedham JS, Dowling JJ (1995) Force-length, torque–angle and EMG-joint angle relationships of the human in vivo biceps brachii. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 70:421–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1976) Servo action in the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 257:1-44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkov DM, Milanovic S, Ilic DB, Jaric S (2002) Symmetry of discrete and oscillatory elbow movements: does it depend on torque that the agonist and antagonist muscle can exert? Mot Control 6:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray WM, Buchanan TS, Delp SL (2000) The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow. J Biomech 33:943–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfann KD, Hoffman DS, Gottlieb GL, Strick PL, Corcos DM (1998) Common principles underlying the control of rapid, single degree-of-freedom movements at different joints. Exp Brain Res 118:35–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanes JN (1986) Kinematics and end-point control of arm movements are modified by unexpected changes in viscous loading. J Neurosci 6:3120–3127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro MB, Gottlieb GL, Moore CG, Corcos DM (2002) Electromyographic responses to an unexpected load in fast voluntary movements: descending regulation of segmental reflexes. J Neurophysiol 88:1059–1063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Erkelens CJ, Denier van der Gon JJ (1990) Adjustments of fast goal-directed movements in response to an unexpected inertial load. Exp Brain Res 81(2):303–312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Dufresne JR, Lacquaniti F (1981) Time-varying properties of myotatic response in man during some simple motor tasks. J Neurophysiol 49(6):1226–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternad D, Corcos D (2001) Effect of task and instruction on patterns of muscle activation: Wachholder and beyond. Mot Control 5:307–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomis MA, Van Leemputte M, Maes HH et al. (1997) Multivariate genetic analysis of maximal isometric muscle force at different elbow angles. J Appl Physiol 82:959–967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wachholder K, Altenburger H (1926) Beiträge zur Physiologie der willkürlichen Bewegung. X. Mitteilung. Einzelbewegungen. Pflugers Arch 214:642–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters JM, Woo SL (1990) Multiple muscle systems. Biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, New York

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AR33189, NS21827, and NS40902. We would also like to acknowledge the valuable comments of Dr. Ziaul Hasan and Dr. Mark Shapiro, and Rachel Musenge for her assistance in editing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janey Prodoehl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prodoehl, J., Gottlieb, G.L. & Corcos, D.M. The neural control of single degree-of-freedom elbow movements. Exp Brain Res 153, 7–15 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1564-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1564-8

Keywords

Navigation