Skip to main content
Log in

EMG Patterns of the Elbow- and Shoulder-Operating Muscles in Slow Parafrontal Upper Limb Movements under Isotonic Loading

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Averaged EMGs were recorded from the elbow- and shoulder-operating muscles in 10 adult men during parafrontal slow test movements of the hand performed within the horizontal plane. The movements between the left and right end-point positions were carried out with a constant 4 cm/sec velocity in both directions consequently; two identical isotonic loads (10.2 N) were applied to the hand along the rightward and leftward movement traces (Fr and Fl) with respect to the subject’s body. The elbow and shoulder flexors demonstrated a synergic unification, reacting predominantly to the Fr loads; a similar synergy was manifested by the extensors of both joints in their reactions to the Fl loads. Under the action of the corresponding loads, EMGs of both flexor and extensor muscle groups showed strong hysteresis (counterclockwise and clockwise loops, respectively). The muscles acting as agonists for a given direction of loading (flexors for the Fr loads, extensors for the Fl loads) participated also in a co-contraction mode as antagonists in the movements fulfilled under oppositely directed loads; the direction of hysteresis loops was reversed in this case, and their amplitude decreased. The obtained results allow us to conclude that hysteresis properties of muscle contraction and the related characteristics of signal transmission in the motor control system lead to strong hysteresis-associated modifications of central commands coming to the muscles in various movement tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Tomiak, T. I. Abramovych, A. V. Gorkovenko, et al., “The movement- and load-dependent differences in the EMG patterns of the human arm muscles during twojoint movements (a preliminary study),” Front. Physiol., 7, No. 218, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00218 (2016).

  2. A. I. Kostyukov and T. Tomiak, “The force generation in a two-joint arm model: analysis of the joint torques in the working space,” Front. Neurorobot., 12, No. 77 , doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00077 (2018).

  3. A. V. Gorkovenko, “Theoretical analysis of the peculiarities of motor control at generation of twojoint isometric efforts by the human upper limb,” Neurophysiology, 50, No. 4, 309-321 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Kostyukov, “Theoretical analysis of the force and position synergies in two-joint movements,” Neurophysiology, 48, No. 4, 287-296 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Tomiak, A. V. Gorkovenko, A. N. Tal’nov, et al., “The averaged EMGs recorded from the arm muscles during bimanual “rowing” movements,” Front. Physiol., 6, No. 349, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00349 (2015).

  6. O. V. Lehedza, A. V. Gorkovenko, I. V. Vereshchaka, et al., “Comparative analysis of electromyographic muscle activity of the human hand during cyclic turns of isometric effort vector of wrist in opposite directions,” Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol., 61, No. 2, 3-14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. V. Lehedza, “Manifestations of hysteresis in EMG activity of muscles of the human upper limb in generation of cyclic isometric efforts,” Neurophysiology, 49, No. 3, 220-225 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. Gorkovenko, “Methods of analysis of central motor commands related to realization of two-joint arm movements in humans,” Neurophysiology, 41, No. 3, 51-53 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. I. Kostyukov, “Muscle dynamics: dependence of muscle length on changes in external load,” Biol. Cybern., 56, Nos. 5/6, 375-387 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A. I. Kostyukov, “Muscle hysteresis and movement control: a theoretical study,” Neuroscience, 83, No. 1, 303-320 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A. I. Kostyukov, and O. E. Korchak, “Length changes of the cat soleus muscle under frequency-modulated distributed stimulation of efferents in isotony,” Neuroscience, 82, No. 3, 943-955 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. V. Gorkovenko, S. Sawczyn, N. V. Bulgakova, et al., “Muscle agonist-antagonist interactions in an experimental joint model,” Exp. Brain Res., 222, 399-414 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. T. E. Milner and C. Cloutier, “Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement,” Exp. Brain Res., 122, No. 3, 309-317 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Burde, R. Osu, D. W. Franklin, et al., “The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance,” Nature, 414, No. 6862, 446-449 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. L. Gribble and D. J. Ostry, “Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles,” Exp. Brain Res., 123, No. 3, 335-360 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. M. Hill, A. M. J. Bull, A. L. Wallace, and G. R. Johnson, “Qualitative and quantitative descriptions of glenohumeral motion,” Gait Posture, 27, No. 2, 177-188 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. C. D. Bryce and A. D. Armstrong, “Anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow,” Orthop. Clin. North Am., 39, No. 2, 141-154 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. B. M. Van Bolhuis, C. C. Gielen, and G. J. van Ingen Schenau, “Activation patterns of mono- and bi-articular arm muscles as a function of force and movement direction of the wrist in humans,” J. Physiol., 508, Part 1, 313-324 (1998).

  19. J. M. Hollerbach, “Computers, brains, and the control of movement,” Trends Neurosci., 5, 189-192 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. M. Wolpert and Z. Ghahramani, “Computational principles of movement neuroscience,” Nat. Neurosci., 3, 1212-1217 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D. M. Wolpert and M. Kawato, “Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control,” Neural Network, 11, 1317-1329 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Kawato, “Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 9, No. 6, 718-727 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Dounskaia, “The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements,” Exp. Brain Res., 166, No. 1, 1-16 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Dounskaia and J. Goble, “The role of vision, speed and attention in overcoming directional biases during arm movements,” Exp. Brain Res., 209, No. 2, 299-309 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Dounskaia, J. Goble, and W. Wang, “The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: implications from directional preferences,” J. Neurophysiol., 105, No. 3, 999-1010 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Dounskaia and W. Wang, “A preferred pattern of joint coordination during arm movements with redundant degrees of freedom,” J. Neurophysiol., 112, No. 5, 1040-1053 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Kostyukov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vereshchaka, I.V., Gorkovenko, A.V., Lehedza, O.V. et al. EMG Patterns of the Elbow- and Shoulder-Operating Muscles in Slow Parafrontal Upper Limb Movements under Isotonic Loading. Neurophysiology 50, 466–474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09779-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09779-8

Keywords

Navigation