Skip to main content
Log in

Conformally Embedded Spacetimes and the Space of Null Geodesics

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that the space of null geodesics of a causally simple spacetime is Hausdorff if it admits an open conformal embedding into a globally hyperbolic spacetime. This provides an obstruction to conformal embeddings of causally simple spacetimes into globally hyperbolic ones irrespective of curvature conditions. Examples of causally simple spacetimes are given not conformally embeddable into globally hyperbolic ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beem, J.K., Ehrlich, P.E., Easley, K.L.: Global Lorentzian Geometry. Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 202, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernal, A.N., Sánchez, M.: Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined as ‘causal’ instead of ‘strongly causal’. Class. Quantum Gravity 24(3), 745–749 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, P., Suhr, S.: Lyapounov functions of closed cone fields: from conley theory to time functions. Commun. Math. Phys. 359(2), 467–498 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bredon, G.E.: Topology and Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 139. Springer, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brickell, F., Clark, R.S.: Differentiable Manifolds: An Introduction. The New University Mathematics Series. Van Nostrand Reinhold, London (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chernov, V.: Conjectures on the relations of linking and causality in causally simple spacetimes. Class. Quantum Gravity 35, 105010 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Flores, J.L., Herrera, J., Sánchez, M.: On the final definition of the causal boundary and its relation with the conformal boundary. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 15(4), 991–1057 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Guillemin, V.: Cosmology in \((2 + 1)\)-Dimensions, Cyclic Models, and Deformations of \(M_{2,1}\). Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 121. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Klingenberg, W.: A Course in Differential Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 51. Springer, New York (1978)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, J.: Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 218, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Low, R.J.: The geometry of the space of null geodesics. J. Math. Phys. 30(4), 809–811 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Low, R.J.: Spaces of causal paths and naked singularities. Class. Quantum Gravity 7, 943–954 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Low, R.J.: The space of null geodesics (and a new causal boundary). In: Frauendiener, J., Giulini, D.J., Perlick, V. (eds.) Analytical and Numerical Approaches to Mathematical Relativity. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 692. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Minguzzi, E.: Limit curve theorems in Lorentzian geometry. J. Math. Phys. 49, 092501 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Minguzzi, E., Sánchez, M.: The causal hierarchy of spacetimes. In: Alekseevsky, D.V., Baum, H. (eds.) Recent Developments in Pseudo-Riemannian Geometry, 299–358. European Mathematical Society, Zuürich (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neill, B.: Semi-Riemannian Geometry, With Applications to Relativity. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 103. Academic Press Inc., New York (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Suhr, S.: A counterexample to Guillemin’s Zollfrei conjecture. J. Topol. Anal. 05, 251–260 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Suhr.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Chrusciel

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research is supported by the SFB/TRR 191 “Symplectic Structures in Geometry, Algebra and Dynamics”, funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Appendix A. The Index Form of a Null Geodesic

Appendix A. The Index Form of a Null Geodesic

Here we recall the definition and the properties of the index form of a null geodesic for the convenience of the reader. The material with proofs and additional explanations can be found in [1, Chapter 10] and the references therein.

Let (Mg) be a spacetime and \(\gamma :[a,b]\rightarrow M\) be a null geodesic. Denote with

$$\begin{aligned} \gamma ^\perp :=\{v\in \gamma ^*TM|\; g(v,{\dot{\gamma }})=0\} \end{aligned}$$

the orthogonal bundle to \(\gamma \). Define a equivalence relation \(\sim \) on \(\gamma ^\perp \) by setting \(v\sim w\) if \(w-v\in \text {span}({\dot{\gamma }})\). Denote with \(\overline{v}\) the equivalence class of \(v\in \gamma ^\perp \). The quotient bundle

$$\begin{aligned} \overline{\gamma ^\perp }:=\gamma ^\perp /\sim \end{aligned}$$

is a smooth bundle over [ab]. Since \(\gamma \) is null one has \(g(v_1,w_1)=g(v_2,w_2)\) for all \(v_1,v_2,w_1,w_2\in \gamma ^\perp \) with \(\overline{v_1}=\overline{v_2}\) and \(\overline{w_1}=\overline{w_2}\). The same is true for the curvature endomorphism \(R(.,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}\), i.e.

$$\begin{aligned} R(v,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}=R(w,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}\in \gamma ^\perp \end{aligned}$$

if \(v-w\in \text {span}({\dot{\gamma }})\). Thus both the metric g and the curvature endomorphism \(R(.,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}\) descend to a well defined metric \(\overline{g}\) on \(\overline{\gamma ^\perp }\) with

$$\begin{aligned} \overline{g}(\overline{v},\overline{w}):=g(v,w) \end{aligned}$$

and a well defined endomorphism field \(\overline{R}(.,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}\) on \(\overline{\gamma ^\perp }\) with

$$\begin{aligned} \overline{R}(\overline{v},{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}:=\overline{R(v,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}}. \end{aligned}$$

If \(X\in \Gamma (\gamma ^\perp )\) the covariant derivative is again a smooth section of \(\gamma ^\perp \). Further if \(X-Y\in \text {span}({\dot{\gamma }})\) everywhere, then \(\nabla _{{\dot{\gamma }}}(X-Y)\in \text {span}({\dot{\gamma }})\) everywhere as well. Therefore the covariant derivative \(\nabla _{{\dot{\gamma }}}\) descends to a covariant derivative on \(\overline{\gamma ^\perp }\). Abbreviate the covariant derivative by a prime, i.e.

$$\begin{aligned} V':=\overline{\nabla _{{\dot{\gamma }}} X}, \end{aligned}$$

where V denotes the quotient section of \(X\in \Gamma (\gamma ^\perp )\), i.e. \(\overline{X}_t=V_t\) for all \(t\in [a,b]\).

Denote with \(\mathfrak {X}(\gamma )\) the piecewise smooth sections of \(\overline{\gamma ^\perp }\) and let

$$\begin{aligned} \mathfrak {X}_0(\gamma ):=\{V\in \mathfrak {X}(\gamma )|\; V_a=0_a\text { and }V_b=0_b\}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(0_t\) denotes the zero vector in \(\overline{\gamma ^\perp }_t\).

Definition A.1

A smooth section \(V\in \mathfrak {X}(\gamma )\) is said to be a Jacobi class in \(\gamma ^\perp \) if V satisfies the Jacobi equation

$$\begin{aligned} V''+\overline{R}(V,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }}=0. \end{aligned}$$

Lemma A.2

Let W be a Jacobi class in \(\mathfrak {X}(\gamma )\). Then there exists a Jacobi field \(Y\in \Gamma (\gamma ^\perp )\) with \(\overline{Y_t}=W_t\) for all \(t\in [a,b]\). Conversely if Y is a Jacobi field in \(\gamma ^\perp \), then \(t\mapsto W_t:=\overline{Y_t}\) is a Jacobi class in \(\overline{\gamma ^\perp }\).

Lemma A.3

Let \(W\in \mathfrak {X}(\gamma )\) be a Jacobi class with \(W_a=0_a\) and \(W_b=0_b\). Then there is a unique Jacobi field \(Z\in \Gamma (\gamma ^\perp )\) with \(\overline{Z_t}=W_t\) for all \(t\in [a,b]\) that vanishes at a and b.

Definition A.4

For \(s\ne t\in [a,b]\), s and t are said to be conjugated along\(\gamma \) if there exists a Jacobi class \(W\ne 0\) in \(\mathfrak {X}(\gamma )\) with \(W_{s}=0_s\) and \(W_{t}=0_t\). Also \(t\in (a,b]\) is said to be a conjugate point of\(\gamma \) if \(s=a\) and t are conjugate along \(\gamma \).

Definition A.5

The index form\(\overline{I}:\mathfrak {X}(\gamma )\times \mathfrak {X}(\gamma )\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \overline{I}(V,W)=-\int _a^b [\overline{g}(V',W')-\overline{g}(\overline{R}(V,{\dot{\gamma }}){\dot{\gamma }},W)]dt. \end{aligned}$$

Theorem A.6

Let \(\gamma :[a,b]\rightarrow M\) be a null geodesic segment. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. (a)

    The segment \(\gamma \) has no conjugate points to \(s=a\) in (ab].

  2. (b)

    \(\overline{I}(W,W)<0\) for all \(W\in \mathfrak {X}_0(\gamma )\), \(W\ne 0\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hedicke, J., Suhr, S. Conformally Embedded Spacetimes and the Space of Null Geodesics. Commun. Math. Phys. 375, 1561–1577 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03499-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03499-0

Navigation