Skip to main content
Log in

Non-destructive and objective methods for the evaluation of the maturation level of olive fruit

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maturation level of two olive varieties (Olea europaea, cvs. Arbequina and Picual) was objectively evaluated using two non-destructive methods: checking the fruit firmness using a hand densimeter, and the skin colour with a portable colourimeter. These methods were compared with the Ripening Index (RI), habitually used by olive oil industry, and based on the subjective determination of skin and flesh colour. The values of skin colour [L*(b*−a*)/100] only monitor the olive maturation in both varieties, when the olive is losing its initial green colour, while fruit firmness is decreasing throughout the maturation process. Fruit firmness is directly related to RI and could be useful in objectively estimating the maturation level of the olives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. García JM, Seller S, Pérez-Camino MC (1996a) J Agric Food Chem 44:3516–3520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crisosto CH (1994) Post-harvest News and Information 5:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reid MS (1992) In: Kader AA (ed) Postharvest technology of horticultural Crops, 2nd edn. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication, Oakland, CA, USA, pp 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  4. Uceda, M, Frias L (1975) Harvest dates. Evolution of the fruit oil content, oil composition and oil quality. In: Proceedings of the II Seminario Oleícola Internacional; International Olive Oil Council: Cordoba, Spain, pp 125–130

  5. Tovar MJ, Romero MP, Alegre S, Girona J, Motilva MJ (2002) J Sci Food Agric 82:1755–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranalli A, Tombesi A, Ferrante ML, de Mattia G (1997) Rev Ita delle Sostanze Grasse 74:553–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nanos GD, Agtsidou E, Sfakiotakis EM (2002) HortSci 37:1079–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mickelbart MV, James D (2003) New Zealand J Crop HortSci 31:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soda I, Hasegawa T, Suzuki T (1987) J Agric Sci 31:261–264

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muramatsu N, Kiyohide K, Tatsushi O (1996a) HortScience 31(1):114–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor MA, Rabe E, Jacobs G, Dodd MC (1995) Post Biol Technol 5:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehman-Salada L (1996) HortScience 31(6):994–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Polderdijk JJ, Tijskens LMM, Robberts JE, Van der Valk HCP (1993) Post Biol Technol 2:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blankenship SM, Parker M, Unrath CR (1997) HortScience 32(5):909–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahumada M, Cantwell M (1996) Post Biol Technol 7:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mercado-Silva E, Benito-Bautista P, García-Velasco MA (1998) Post Biol Technol 13:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brovelli EA, Brecht JK, Sherman WB, Sims CA (1998) J Am Soc HortSci 123(3):438–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. García JM, Gutiérrez F, Barrera MJ, Albi MA (1996b) J Agric Food Chem 44:590–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. García JM, Medina RJ, Olías, JM (1998) J Food Sci 63(6):1037–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olmo M, Nadas A, García JM (2000) J Food Sci 65:365–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Muramatsu N, Sakurai N, Yamamoto R, Nevins DJ (1996b) HortScienceS 31(7):1199–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. García JM, Streif J (1991) Gartenbauwissenschaft 56:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  23. García JM (1993) Grasas y Aceites 44:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Castellano JM, García JM, Morilla A, Gutiérrez F, Perdiguero S (1993) J Agric Food Chem 41:537–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. García JM, Gutiérrez F, Castellano JM, Perdiguero S, Morilla A, Albi MA (1996c) J Agric Food Chem 44:264–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ting SV, Rouseff RL (1986) Anal Technol 3:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Casas A, Mallent D (1988) Agrochim Technol Aliment 28(2):184–201

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gnanasekharan V, Shewfelt RL, Chinnan MS (1992) J Food Sci 57(1):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi K, Lee G, Han YJ, Bun JM (1995) Trans ASAE 38(1):171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Luchsinger LE, Walsh CS (1993) Acta Hort 343:70–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to M.C. Martínez for technical assistance. This work was supported by Research Project AGL2002–02307 from Programa Nacional de Recursos y Tecnologías Alimentarias funded by the Spanish Government, and Research Project CAO01-004 funded by the Junta de Andalucía.We also express our sincere gratitude to the Spanish Foreign Ministry for supporting the AECI K. Yousfi grant

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Garcia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia, J.M., Yousfi, K. Non-destructive and objective methods for the evaluation of the maturation level of olive fruit. Eur Food Res Technol 221, 538–541 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-1180-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-1180-x

Keywords

Navigation