Skip to main content
Log in

Pectin methylesterase activity in juices from mandarins, oranges and hybrids

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 10 January 2006

An Erratum to this article was published on 10 January 2006

Abstract

The pectin methylesterase (PME) activity of fresh and processed juices obtained from Valencia-late oranges, Clementine mandarins (cultivar Nules) and citrus hybrids (Ortanique) was studied. The PME activity was measured using a modification of the traditional method of Rouse and Atkins [1], based on the titration of carboxylic groups generated by PME during the hydrolysis of a commercial pectin solution. Instead of maintaining the pH at a given value by addition of NaOH, the maximum rate of pH decrease is used as measurement of the PME activity. An exponential decay function accurately represents the evolution of pH with time from a starting value of pH = 7.8 (optimum pH of PME activity for all assayed cultivars). This function allows an easy calculation of the PME activity. The total PME activity measured was similar in Clementine and Valencia-late juices, and approximately twice that of Ortanique juices. Ratios between thermostable and total PME activity were 4.0–8.4% for Clementine, 12.6–12.7% for Valencia-late and 24.2–34.2% for Ortanique juices. Soft heat treatments (70 °C, 30 s or 74 °C, 10 s) were enough to reduce the total PME activity of Clementine juices under the maximum residual level (10%) for commercial life of refrigerated juices, according to Irwe and Olson [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rouse AH, Atkins CD (1955) Bull Univ Florida 570:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Irwe S, Olson I (1994) In: Sing RP, Oliveira FAR (eds) Minimal processing of foods and process optimization, pp 35–42

  3. Baker RA, Cameron RG (1999) Food Technol 53:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klavons JA, Bennett RD, Vannier SH (1991) J Agric Food Chem 39:1546–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Klavons JA, Bennett RD, Vannier SH (1994) J Food Sci 59:399–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crandall PG, Matthews RF, Baker RA (1983) Food Technol 37:106–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Joslyn MA, Pilnik W (1961) In: Sinclair WB (ed) The orange – its biochemistry and physiology. University of California, Berkeley, California, pp 373–398

  8. El Nawawi SA, Heikel YA (1997) Process Biochem 32:381–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimball DA (1999) Citrus processing. A complete guide, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Atkins CD, Rouse AH (1953) Food Technol 7:489–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Versteeg C (1979) Agricultural-Research-Reports. Wageningen Agriculture University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, No. 892, 109 pp

  12. Snir R, Koehler PE, Sims KA, Wicker L (1996) J Food Sci 61:379–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vercet A, Lopez P, Burgos J (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:432–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cameron RG, Baker RA, Grohmann K (1998) J Food Sci 63:253–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wicker L, Ackerley JL, Corredig M (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:4091–4095

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Polydera AC, Galanou E, Stoforos NG, Taoukis PS (2004) J Food Eng 62:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadler GD, Parish ME, Wicker L (1992) J Food Sci 57:1187–1191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JY, Lin YS, Chang HM, Chen W (2003) J Sci Food Agric 83:681–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. King K (1991) J Sci Food Agric 57:43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nienaber U, Shellhammer TH (2001) J Food Sci 66:328–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Termote F, Rombouts FM, Pilnik W (1977) J Food Biochem 1:15–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeom HW, Zhang QH, Chism GW (2002) J Food Sci 67:2154–2159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nielsen JE, Christensen TMIE (2002) Plant Sci 162:799–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sentandreu G, Carbonell L, Carbonell JV, Izquierdo L (2005) Food Sci Technol Int 11:217–222

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, project AGL2002-01172ALI) and AGROALIMED (Consellería de Agricultura, Pesca i Alimentació, Generalitat Valenciana)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José V. Carbonell.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0180-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carbonell, J.V., Contreras, P., Carbonell, L. et al. Pectin methylesterase activity in juices from mandarins, oranges and hybrids. Eur Food Res Technol 222, 83–87 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0043-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0043-9

Keywords

Navigation