Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of hydrocolloids and high-pressure-heating processing on minced fish gels

  • Original paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multivariate statistical methods were applied to data sets of measured gelling properties of blue whiting mince with several hydrocolloids added (locust bean gum, guar gum, xanthan gum, carboxymethylcellulose, ι-carrageenan, κ-carrageenan or alginate) induced under different pressure-time-temperature gelling conditions. The main differences between gels were attributed to the process; all the gels were classified in three clusters on the basis of gelling treatment: (1) high-pressure at moderate heating, (2) high-pressure at cold temperature and (3) heating at atmospheric pressure. Cluster 1 was characterized by very elastic, light gels with high water holding capacity. In cluster 2, gels presented high puncture test properties (breaking deformation, breaking force, work of penetration) and high cohesiveness and water holding capacity. Cluster 3 gels presented low penetration test properties and cohesiveness; high adhesiveness and hardness; high lightness and yellowness. Each cluster was subdivided to describe the gel properties between the hydrocolloid groups, attributing the differences mainly to yellowness (b*), breaking deformation, breaking force and work of penetration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revised version: 14 September 2001

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez-Mateos, M., Montero, P. Effects of hydrocolloids and high-pressure-heating processing on minced fish gels. Eur Food Res Technol 214, 119–124 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-001-0426-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-001-0426-5

Navigation