Chemicals and materials
CBN (1 mg/mL in methanol, certified reference material), CBN-d3 (100 μg/mL in methanol, certified reference material), CBD (1 mg/mL in methanol, certified reference material), and CBD-d3 (100 μg/mL in methanol, certified reference material) were bought from Cerilliant; acetonitrile (HPLC gradient grade), methanol (HPLC gradient grade), n-hexane (HPLC grade), n-heptane (HPLC grade), and formic acid (98–100%) were obtained from VWR Chemicals; dichloromethane (HPLC grade) from Carl Roth, triethylamine from ACROS Organics, Fast Blue Salt B (FBS, dye content ~ 95%) from Sigma-Aldrich, Chromabond SiOH (1 ml/100 mg), Chromabond C18 ec (1 ml/ 100 mg) as well as TLC (thin-layer chromatography) plates (silica gel 60, ALUGRAM Xtra SIL G UV254 and octadecyl-modified silica, ALUGRAM RP-18 W/UV254) from Macherey-Nagel, TLC plates (silica gel 60 without fluorescent indicator on aluminum sheets), and HPTLC (high-performance thin-layer chromatography) plates (silica gel 60 F254 MS-grade for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and silica gel 60 F254 on glass plates) were purchased from Merck KGaA and analytical sea sand from Grüssig GmbH. Distilled diethyl ether and acetone were produced with a rotary evaporator from BÜCHI.
Preparation of standard solutions
A stock solution of CBN from Cerilliant (1 mg/mL in methanol) was diluted with methanol to obtain working solutions down to a concentration of 0.3 μg/mL. CBN-d3 working solutions (2.5 μg/mL and 5.0 μg/mL) as internal standards were prepared in methanol. For the calibration, solutions holding different mixtures of CBN and CBN-d3 were prepared (CBN, in the range of 1.0–6.2 μg/mL; CBN-d3, 2.5 μg/mL), and for the validation of the HPTLC-ESI-MS method, different mixtures of CBN and CBN-d3 were used (CBN, 1.4, 1.8, 2.2, 2.5, 3.4, 5.0, 5.4 μg/mL; CBN-d3, 2.5 μg/mL).
Detection of CBN with FBS reagent (modified according to an application note from CAMAG [16])
The post-chromatographic detection reaction was performed with FBS reagent using CBN working solutions and sample extracts (25 μL aliquots) spotted onto TLC or HPTLC plates. For the preparation of the FBS reagent, FBS (250 mg) was completely dissolved in distilled water (10 mL) and was mixed with methanol (25 mL) and dichloromethane (15 mL). This reagent was always freshly prepared before use. (HP)TLC plates were developed in n-hexane/acetone/triethylamine (40:20:2 v/v/v; see Watanabe et al. [17]), sprayed with the reagent, and the presence of red spots indicated a positive response.
Detection of CBN with cerium-molybdenum reagent
In addition, post-chromatographic detection reactions were performed with cerium-molybdenum reagent using CBN working solutions and sample extracts (25 μL aliquots) spotted onto (HP)TLC plates. For the preparation of the cerium-molybdenum reagent, cerium(IV) sulfate (400 mg) and ammonium molybdate (20 g) were dissolved in 10% (v/v) sulfuric acid (400 mL). (HP)TLC plates were developed in n-heptane/diethyl ether/formic acid (75:25:0.3 v/v/v; according to an application note from CAMAG [16]), n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v), or n-hexane/acetone/triethylamine (40:20:2 v/v/v), sprayed with the reagent, and blue spots became visible after exposure to heat.
Samples
Samples of a 3.55-m-long sediment core from Badanital (30° 29′ 50″ N, 78° 55′ 26 E, 2083 m a.s.l.), a small lake in the West Himalayan oak forest zone in Northern India, have been investigated. The core was retrieved using a piston corer in January 2008 (see Kotlia and Joshi [18]). Contiguous subsamples were taken in 1 cm slices and dried at 30 °C for storage and transportation to the pollen laboratory at the Institute of Geological Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin. Sediment samples, covering a period from 2220 BCE to 1390 CE, were examined concerning Cannabis pollen; they were categorized into real samples (positive samples), containing Cannabis pollen, and negative samples without Cannabis pollen. The procedure for pollen analyses is based on morphological characteristics as well as further results of the determination of palynomorphs; detailed results from accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dating using bulk sediment rich in organics were described by Demske et al. [15]. For the reconstruction of climatic changes based on geochemical parameters of sediment samples from Badanital lake, see Kotlia and Joshi [18].
HPTLC-ESI-MS analysis
Standard solutions and the extracts were spotted onto the TLC or HPTLC plates as 2 mm bands, in 25 μL aliquots, 20 mm from the bottom edge and 8 mm apart using a Linomat 5 (CAMAG, Switzerland). Plates were developed in a rectangular TLC developing chamber to a distance of 50 mm in 15 min using n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v) as the developing solvent. For the optimization of the chromatographic separation, TLC and HPTLC plates as well as various developing solvents were tested, e.g., n-heptane/diethyl ether/formic acid (75:25:0.3 v/v/v) or n-hexane/acetone/triethylamine (40:20:2 v/v/v).
HPTLC plates were inspected both under white light and with under UV light at λ = 254 nm. Beside investigations by MS, different spray reagents were also used for the detection of CBN (see detection of CBN with FBS and cerium-molybdenum reagent).
A TLC-MS interface (Plate Express from Advion combined with an isocratic pump) was utilized for the elution of compounds from the HPTLC plates into an expressionL CMS (compact mass spectrometer from Advion, UK) system, equipped with an ESI ion source (negative mode, capillary temperature 250 °C, capillary voltage 180 V, source voltage offset 20, source voltage span 30, ESI source voltage 2500 V, source gas temperature 200 °C, MS scan range 200–400 m/z). Prior to the measurements, substance-specific parameters were determined by direct inlet of CBN working solutions. Methanol was used as eluent (flow rate 0.2 mL/min).
Offline HPTLC-ESI-HRMS analysis
Standard solutions were spotted onto HPTLC plates; HPTLC plates were developed in n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v), and after 5 h, spots were marked; stationary phase was scraped from the plates and compounds were eluted with methanol (1 mL). This solution was filtered (0.2 μm PTFE) and utilized for HRMS experiments using a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer from Thermo Scientific equipped with an ESI ion source (negative mode, spray voltage 3287 V, spray current 1 μA, capillary temperature 320 °C, sheath gas flow rate 10 L/min, MS scan range 200–900 m/z).
Sample extraction and preparation
The remaining sediment samples analyzed for pollen were sent to the Department of Organic Chemistry, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg (Halle), and used in the current study. An aliquot (1 g) of each sample was extracted with methanol/hexane (10 mL, 9:1 v/v) by the following procedure: 1 min on a vortex and 15 min ultrasonic bath at 30 °C including vortex again after 5 and 10 min. Subsequently, the suspension was centrifuged (10 min, 21 °C, 4200 rpm) in a centrifuge 5403 from Eppendorf. The extraction of the sample was repeated five times. The supernatants were combined, and the solution was evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator (temperature of the water bath, 30 °C). The residue was dissolved in n-heptane/diethyl ether (1 mL, 75:25 v/v) with the help of an ultrasonic bath at 30 °C for a few seconds. Afterwards, the sample extract was transferred to a Chromabond SiOH column conditioned with n-heptane/diethyl ether (75:25 v/v), the sample container was rinsed with n-heptane/diethyl ether (3 × 1 mL, 75:25 v/v), the rinse solution was also transferred onto the sorbent, and the analyte was eluted with n-heptane/diethyl ether (2 mL, 75:25 v/v). The eluate (fraction 1: combined solutions, approximately 6 mL) was evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator (temperature of the water bath, 30 °C), and the residue was dissolved in acetonitrile/water (500 μL, 70:30 v/v). The solution was transferred to a Chromabond C18 ec column conditioned with acetonitrile/water (70:30 v/v). The sample vessel was rinsed with acetonitrile/water (1 mL, 70:30 v/v), the rinse solution was also transferred onto the sorbent, and the analyte was eluted with acetonitrile/water (500 μL, 70:30 v/v, and 3 mL, 80:20 v/v). The eluate (fraction 2: combined solutions, approximately 5 mL) was evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator (temperature of the water bath, 50 °C). The residue was dissolved in methanol (1 mL) and transferred to a vial. The sample pot was rinsed with methanol (3 mL), and this solution was also transferred to this vial step-by-step. The sample solution in the vial was concentrated to dryness in a stream of argon with heat from a laboratory sand bath at 70 °C. The residue was solved in methanol (100 μL), and a defined volume (25 μL) of the sample extract was spotted onto a HPTLC plate (Fig. 2).
For the optimization of the extraction procedure, various extraction times and further extracting agents were tested, e.g., dichloromethane/methanol (90:10 v/v and 1:1 v/v).
Determination of sediment pH
For the determination of the pH of a sample, a pH electrode from HANNA instruments was used. An aliquot (0.5 g) of the sediment sample was suspended in a solution of calcium chloride (0.01 m) at the ratio of 1:2.5. After the sedimentation, the pH was measured.
Determination of the loss on ignition (modified according to Heiri et al. [19])
The loss on ignition at 550 °C (LOI550) was determined using a thermobalance STA 449C from Netzsch (reference: empty crucible of corundum). An aliquot of the sample (15–25 mg) was weighted in a crucible of corundum, and a stream of gas (N2/O2 = 80/20, 50 mL/min) was applied. Before each measurement, an equilibration of the thermobalance was performed for about 30 min at room temperature with current gas flow. Afterwards, the sample chamber was heated to 800 °C (heat rate 10 K/min). The weight loss is proportional to the amount of organic carbon contained in samples. For the calculation, the following formula (1) was used:
$$ {LOI}_{550}=\left(\left({DW}_{105}-{DW}_{550}\right)/{DW}_{105}\right)\times 100 $$
(1)
where LOI550 represents the LOI at 550 °C (as percentage), DW105 correspond to the dry weight of the sample before combustion, and DW550 to the dry weight of sample after heating to 550 °C (both in mg, see Heiri et al. [19]).
Determination of C/N content
The determination of the C and N content of the samples were performed with the analytical instrument “Vario EL” from the company Elementar.
Validation of the HPTLC-ESI-MS method
Specificity
The test for specificity was performed with a negative sample (without CBN) and a real sample (containing CBN) applying the post-chromatographic detection reaction with cerium-molybdenum reagent and HPTLC-ESI-MS using standard compounds. For HPTLC-ESI-MS experiments as well as for the detection of CBN with the cerium-molybdenum reagent, a sample extract was spotted onto a HPTLC plate; the HPTLC plate was developed in n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v) and investigated by HPTLC-ESI-MS or sprayed with cerium-molybdenum reagent.
Linearity, limit of detection, and limit of quantification
The linearity of the calibration function was tested with the Mandel’s test. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined by means of a calibration curve method according to DIN 32645 [20], thereby spotting the calibration solutions (see preparation of standard solutions) onto HPTLC plates; the HPTLC plates were developed using n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v) and investigated by HPTLC-ESI-MS. Each calibration solution was measured three times, and analyses were executed with average peak areas of the mass peaks of CBN (sum of m/z 309 and 354) and CBN-d3 (sum of m/z 312 and 357). Average peak area ratios and CBN concentrations are depicted in Fig. S1 and Tab. S1 (see Electronic Supplementary Material, ESM).
Precision
For determining the repeatability, two to five replicate determinations on eight different days were carried out. For this purpose, a solution containing CBN and CBN-d3 (CBN 3.4 μg/mL, CBN-d3 2.5 μg/mL) was spotted onto HPTLC plates; HPTLC plates were developed using n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v) and investigated by HPTLC-ESI-MS. For the interpretation of the repeatability, the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the CBN content was used. Furthermore, Dixon’s Q test and Neumann trend test were applied for the identification of outliers or trends (see Table S2 of the ESM).
For determining the method precision, sediment sample BT-78 was utilized. Analyses were carried out with a number of six replicates and each aliquot of the sediment sample (approximately 1 g) was spiked with a defined concentration of CBN (100 μL; 3.4 μg/mL) and CBN-d3 (100 μL; 2.5 μg/mL). Extractions and preparations of the different samples were performed independently of each other as described above. After SPE using a Chromabond C18 ec column, the residues were dissolved in methanol (100 μL) and defined volumes (25 μL) of the sample extracts were spotted onto HPTLC plates; HPTLC plates were developed in n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v) and were investigated by HPTLC-ESI-MS. For the interpretation of the method precision, the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the CBN content was used. Furthermore, Dixon’s Q test and Neumann trend test were applied for the identification of outliers or trends (see Table S2 of the ESM).
Trueness
The trueness was expressed in terms of recovery and bias. Bias calculation was performed for two concentration levels with a number of three replicates at each concentration (see Table S3 of the ESM). Sediment samples (approximately 1 g) were spiked with a defined concentration of CBN (100 μL; 5.4 μg/mL and 1.8 μg/mL) and CBN-d3 (100 μL; 2.5 μg/mL). Extractions and preparations of the different samples as well as the planar chromatographic separations were performed independently of each other as described above. Real samples were used for bias calculation due to a limited sample amount. For the bias calculation, the following formula (2) was used:
$$ \hat{\delta}=\overline{x}-T $$
(2)
where \( \hat{\delta} \) represents the bias and T correspond to the “true” concentration and \( \overline{x} \) to the mean value of the determined concentrations of the spiked sample materials.
Recovery
Three negative samples from different positions in the sedimentary core were used for the determination of the recovery. After the sediment samples have been weighed (approximately 1 g, see Fig. 2), defined concentrations of CBN (100 μL; 1.4, 2.5, and 3.4 μg/mL) were added and each concentration level was analyzed in duplicate (see Table S4 of the ESM). Extractions and preparations of the different samples were performed independently of each other on different days as described above. After SPE using a Chromabond C18 ec column, the residues were dissolved in a methanolic solution of CBN-d3 (100 μL; 2.5 μg/mL) and were spotted onto HPTLC plates; HPTLC plates were developed in n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v) and were investigated by HPTLC-ESI-MS. The calculated CBN contents were compared with the target concentrations and the recovery rate was determined.
Stability of the standards
For testing the storage stability of standard solutions, solutions of CBN (50 and 100 μg/mL) were stored at − 12 °C in the dark, at room temperature (average temperature + 28 °C) in the dark and at room temperature exposed to sunlight. The different solutions were examined over a 4-week period. For analyses, solutions of CBN were diluted, CBN-d3 was added, and the mixtures (CBN 2.2 and 5.0 μg/mL; CBN-d3 2.5 μg/mL) were spotted onto HPTLC plates. Mass peak areas of CBN (sum of m/z 309 and 354) and CBN-d3 (sum of m/z 312 and 357) were utilized for calculating the stability of CBN. For the identification of trends, a trend test by Neumann [20] was performed (see Table S5 of the ESM).
In addition, the stability of CBN and CBN-d3 already having been spotted onto (HP)TLC plates was evaluated. For this purpose, a solution containing CBN and CBN-d3 (CBN 5.0 μg/mL; CBN-d3 5.0 μg/mL) was spotted in triplicate onto a TLC and a HPTLC plate. (HP)TLC plates were developed in n-heptane/diethyl ether (90:10 v/v) and were investigated by HPTLC-ESI-MS at a time interval of 3 h (measuring after 0.5, 1.5, and 3 h). Furthermore, investigations were performed on (HP)TLC plates spotted with CBN and CBN-d3 without developing the chromatograms. For analyses, mass peak intensities of CBN (ratios of m/z 309 and 354) and CBN-d3 (ratios of m/z 312 and 357) were utilized.