Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of N-ethyl maleimide and N-(1-phenylethyl) maleimide for derivatization of biological thiols using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ratio between reduced and oxidized thiols, mainly glutathione and oxidized glutathione, is one of the biomarkers for the evaluation of oxidative stress. The accurate measurement of thiol concentrations is challenging because reduced thiols are easily oxidized during sample manipulation. Derivatization is commonly used to protect thiols from oxidation. The objective of this work was to systematically compare two cell-permeable derivatizing agents: N-ethyl maleimide (NEM) and (R)-(+)-N-(1-phenylethyl)maleimide (NPEM) in terms of derivatization efficiency, ionization enhancement, side product formation, reaction selectivity for thiols, pH dependence of the reaction, and derivative stability. All thiol measurements and the characterization of side products were performed using a biphenyl reversed phase liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). Four thiols, cysteine (CYS), homocysteine, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and glutathione (GSH), were used for the evaluation. Using 1:10 ratio of thiol:derivatizing agent, complete derivatization was obtained within 30 min for both agents tested with the exception of CYS-NEM, where 97% efficiency was obtained. The more hydrophobic NPEM provided better ionization of the thiols, with enhancement ranging from 2.1x for GSH to 5.7x for CYS in comparison to NEM. NPEM derivatization led to more extensive side reactions, such as double derivatization and ring opening, which hindered the accurate measurement of the thiol concentrations. Both NEM and NPEM also showed poor stability of CYS derivative due to its time-dependent conversion to cyclic cysteine-maleimide derivative. Both reagents also showed significant reactivity with amine-containing metabolites depending on the pH used during derivatization, but overall NEM was found to be more selective towards thiol group than NPEM. Taking into account all evaluation criteria, NEM was selected as a more suitable reagent for the thiol protection and derivatization, but strict control of pH 7.0 is recommended to minimize the side reactions. This work illustrates the importance of the characterization of side products and derivative stability during the evaluation of thiol derivatizing agents and contributes fundamental understanding to improve the accuracy of thiol determinations. The key sources of errors during maleimide derivatization include the derivatization of amine-containing metabolites, poor derivative stability of certain thiols (CYS and NAC), and the side reactions especially if ring opening of the reagent is not minimized.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dalle-Donne I, Rossi R. Analysis of thiols. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009;877:3271–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.08.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pastore A, Federici G, Bertini E, Piemonte F. Analysis of glutathione: implication in redox and detoxification. Clin Chim Acta. 2003;333:19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00200-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Toyo’oka T. Recent advances in separation and detection methods for thiol compounds in biological samples. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009;877:3318–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.03.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ortmayr K, Schwaiger M, Hann S, Koellensperger G. An integrated metabolomics workflow for the quantification of sulfur pathway intermediates employing thiol protection with N-ethyl maleimide and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2015;140:7687–95. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AN01629K.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whillier S, Raftos JE, Chapman B, Kuchel PW. Role of N-acetylcysteine and cystine in glutathione synthesis in human erythrocytes. Redox Rep. 2009;14:115–24. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100009X392539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouligand J, Deroussent A, Paci A, Morizet J, Vassal G. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay of reduced and oxidized glutathione and main precursors in mice liver. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006;832:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.12.037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sentellas S, Morales-Ibanez O, Zanuy M, Albertí JJ. GSSG/GSH ratios in cryopreserved rat and human hepatocytes as a biomarker for drug induced oxidative stress. Toxicol in Vitro. 2014;28:1006–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.04.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giustarini D, Tsikas D, Colombo G, Milzani A, Dalle-Donne I, Fanti P, et al. Pitfalls in the analysis of the physiological antioxidant glutathione (GSH) and its disulfide (GSSG) in biological samples: an elephant in the room. J Chromatogr B. 2016;1019:21–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.02.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giustarini D, Colombo G, Garavaglia ML, Astori E, Portinaro NM, Reggiani F, et al. Assessment of glutathione/glutathione disulphide ratio and S-glutathionylated proteins in human blood, solid tissues, and cultured cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;112:360–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.08.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen RE, Winther JR. An introduction to methods for analyzing thiols and disulfides: reactions, reagents, and practical considerations. Anal Biochem. 2009;394:147–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2009.07.051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giustarini D, Dalle-Donne I, Milzani A, Fanti P, Rossi R. Analysis of GSH and GSSG after derivatization with N-ethylmaleimide. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1660–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winters RA, Zukowski J, Ercal N, Matthews RH, Spitz DR. Analysis of glutathione, glutathione disulfide, cysteine, homocysteine, and other biological thiols by high-performance liquid chromatography following derivatization by N-(1-pyrenyl)maleimide. Anal Biochem. 1995;227:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.1246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang W, Rusin O, Xu X, Kim KK, Escobedo JO, Fakayode SO, et al. Detection of homocysteine and cysteine. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:15949–58. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja054962n.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Camera E, Picardo M. Analytical methods to investigate glutathione and related compounds in biological and pathological processes. J Chromatogr B. 2002;781:181–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00618-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paroni R, De Vecchi E, Cighetti G, Arcelloni C, Fermo I, Grossi A, et al. HPLC with o-phthalaldehyde precolumn derivatization to measure total, oxidized, and protein-bound glutathione in blood, plasma, and tissue. Clin Chem. 1995;41:448–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Asensi M, Sastre J, Pallardo FV, Estrela JM, Vina J. Determination of oxidized glutathione in blood: high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Enzymol. 1994;234:367–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(94)34106-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seiwert B, Karst U. Simultaneous LC/MS/MS determination of thiols and disulfides in urine samples based on differential labeling with ferrocene-based maleimides. Anal Chem. 2007;79:7131–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071016b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Agostino LA, Lam KP, Lee R, Britz-McKibbin P. Comprehensive plasma thiol redox status determination for metabolomics. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:592–603. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr100771g.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welch L, Dong X, Hewitt D, Irwin M, McCarty L, Tsai C, et al. Facile quantitation of free thiols in a recombinant monoclonal antibody by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with hydrophobicity-tailored thiol derivatization. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2018;1092:158–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.05.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Zhou L, Lei H, Hao F, Liu X, Wang Y, et al. Simultaneous quantification of amino metabolites in multiple metabolic pathways using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem-mass spectrometry. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01435-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu P, Huang YQ, Cai WJ, Yuan BF, Feng YQ. Profiling of thiol-containing compounds by stable isotope labeling double precursor ion scan mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2014;86:9765–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac5023315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gori SS, Lorkiewicz P, Ehringer DS, Belshoff AC, Higashi RM, Fan TWM, et al. Profiling thiol metabolites and quantification of cellular glutathione using FT-ICR-MS spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:4371–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7810-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Smyth DG, Nagamatsu A, Fruton JS. Some reactions of N-Ethylmaleimide. J Am Chem Soc. 1960;82:4600–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01502a039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sutton TR, Minnion M, Barbarino F, Koster G, Fernandez BO, Cumpstey AF, et al. A robust and versatile mass spectrometry platform for comprehensive assessment of the thiol redox metabolome. Redox Biol. 2018;16:359–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.02.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ates B, Ercal BC, Manda K, Abraham L, Ercal N. Determination of glutathione disulfide levels in biological samples using thiol-disulfide exchanging agent, dithiothreitol. Biomed Chromatogr. 2009;23:119–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.1083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Majima E, Goto S, Hori H, Shinohara Y, Hong YM, Terada H. Stabilities of the fluorescent SH-reagent eosin-5-maleimide and its adducts with sulfhydryl compounds. BBA - Gen Subj. 1995;1243:336–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(94)00159-U.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jemal M, Hawthorne D. High performance liquid chromatography/ionspray mass spectrometry of N-ethylmaleimide and acrylic acid ester derivatives for bioanalysis of thiol compounds. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1994;8:854–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1290081012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Giustarini D, Dalle-Donne I, Milzani A, Rossi R. Detection of glutathione in whole blood after stabilization with N-ethylmaleimide. Anal Biochem. 2011;415:81–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2011.04.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Asensi M, Sastre J, Pallardo FV, de la Asuncion JG, Estrela JM, Viña J. A high-performance liquid chromatography method for measurement of oxidized glutathione in biological samples. Anal Biochem. 1994;217:323–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Santori G, Domenicotti C, Bellocchio A, Pronzato MA, Marinari UM, Cottalasso D. Different efficacy of iodoacetic acid and N-ethylmaleimide in high-performance liquid chromatographic measurement of liver glutathione. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1997;695:427–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00159-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Winther JR, Thorpe C. Quantification of thiols and disulfides. Biochim Biophys Acta, Gen Subj. 2014;1840:838–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fontana A, Toniolo C. Detection and determination of thiols. In: Patai S, editor. The chemistry of the thiol group. Bristol: Wiley; 1974. p. 294–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Paulech J, Solis N, Cordwell SJ. Characterization of reaction conditions providing rapid and specific cysteine alkylation for peptide-based mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta, Proteins Proteomics. 2013;1834:372–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.08.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant RGPIN 435814-20013) and Concordia University (Grant J00126). The funding agencies had no role in study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, manuscript writing, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mariana S. T. Russo

    Present address: Metabolomics Core Facility, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada

    Mariana S. T. Russo, Alexander Napylov, Alexandra Paquet & Dajana Vuckovic

  2. PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, 7200 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada

    Mariana S. T. Russo & Dajana Vuckovic

Authors
  1. Mariana S. T. Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Napylov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandra Paquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dajana Vuckovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dajana Vuckovic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1635 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Russo, M.S.T., Napylov, A., Paquet, A. et al. Comparison of N-ethyl maleimide and N-(1-phenylethyl) maleimide for derivatization of biological thiols using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 412, 1639–1652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02398-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02398-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation