Skip to main content
Log in

Enantioselective separation and simultaneous determination of fenarimol and nuarimol in fruits, vegetables, and soil by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method for simultaneous enantioselective determination of fenarimol and nuarimol in apple, grape, cucumber, tomato, and soil was developed using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The enantioseparation results of the two fungicides through three different cellulose-based chiral columns are discussed. The influence of column temperature on the resolution of the enantiomers of the two fungicides was examined. Complete enantioseparation of the two fungicides’ enantiomers was obtained on a cellulose tris(4-methylbenzoate) column (Lux Cellulose-3) at 25 °C using methanol and 0.1 % formic acid solution (80:20, v/v) as mobile phase. The linearity, matrix effect, recovery, and precision were evaluated. Good linearity was obtained over the concentration range of 1–500 μg L−1 for each enantiomer in the standard solution and sample matrix calibration solution. There was no significant matrix effect in apple, grape, cucumber, or tomato samples, but signal suppression was typically observed with the soil extracts. The mean recoveries, repeatability, and reproducibility were 76.5–103 %, 2.1–9.0 %, and 4.2–11.8 %, respectively. The limit of quantification for enantiomers of the two fungicides in fruits, vegetables and soil was 5 μg kg−1. Moreover, the absolute configuration of the enantiomers of fenarimol and nuarimol was determined from a combination of experimentally determined and predicted electronic circular dichroism spectra.

Predicted ECD spectra of nuarimol enantiomers (a) and fenarimol enantiomers (b). Experimentally measured ECD spectra of nuarimol enantiomers (c) and fenarimol enantiomers (d) in acetonitrile (20 mg L−1)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paolini M, Mesirca R, Pozzetti L, Sapone A, Cantelli-Forti G (1996) Cancer Lett 101:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Poli P, de Mello MA, Buschini A, de Castro VLSS, Restivo FM, Rossi C, Zucchi TMAD (2003) Mutat Res 540:57–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Demirci F, Denizhan E (2010) Phytoparasitica 38:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maier NM, Franco P, Lindner W (2001) J Chromatogr A 906:3–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nillos MG, Gan J, Schlenk D (2010) J Chromatogr B 878:1277–1284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garrison AW, Avants JK, Miller RD (2011) Int J Environ Res Publ Health 8:3453–3467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hühnerfuss H, Shah MR (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:481–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bicchi C, Cravotto G, D'Amato A, Rubiolo P, Galli A, Galli M (1999) J Microcolumn Sep 11:487–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez-Gomez MA, Escuder-Gilabert L, Villanueva-Camanas RM, Sagrado S, Medina-Hernandez MJ (2008) J Sep Sci 31:3265–3271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Dong F, Liu X, Xu J, Li J, Kong Z, Chen X, Song W, Wang Y, Zheng Y (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218:6667–6674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Wang XQ, Qian MR, Wang XY, Xu H, Xu MF, Wang Q (2011) J Agric Food Chem 59:12012–12017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Dong F, Liu X, Xu J, Li J, Kong Z, Chen X, Liang X, Zheng Y (2012) J Chromatogr A 1224:51–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang HW, Qiu J, Li L, Li W, Zhou ZQ, Liu FM, Qiu LH (2012) J Sep Sci 35:166–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sannino A (2004) J AOAC Int 87:991–996

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang SL, Xu YJ, Pan CP, Jiang SR, Liu FM (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 387:673–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hengel MJ (2011) J Am Soc Brew Chem 69:121–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ari F, Dere E (2010) Acta Vet (Beogr) 60:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen HR, Vinggaard AM, Rasmussen TH, Gjermandsen IM, Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC (2002) Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 179:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC, Grunfeld HT (2004) Toxicol Lett 151:467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thibaut R, Porte C (2004) J Steroid Biochem 92:485–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allenmark S, Gawronski J (2008) Chirality 20:606–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding S, Jia L, Durandin A, Crean C, Kolbanovskiy A, Shafirovich V, Broyde S, Geacintov NE (2009) Chem Res Toxicol 22:1189–1193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu YX, Zhang H, Zhuang SL, Yu M, Xiao H, Qian MR (2012) J Agric Food Chem 60:4173–4178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. European Union (2009) Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed (document no. SANCO/10684/2009). European Commission, Brussels

  25. Aboul-Enein HY, Ali I, Gubitz G, Simons C, Nicholls PJ (2000) Chirality 12:727–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang H, Qian MR, Wang XQ, Wang XY, Xu H, Wang Q, Wang MH (2012) J Sep Sci 35:773–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peter A, Vekes E, Armstrong DW (2002) J Chromatogr A 958:89–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. O'Brien T, Crocker L, Thompson R, Thompson K, Toma PH, Conlon DA, Feibush B, Moeder C, Bicker G, Grinberg N (1997) Anal Chem 69:1999–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lehotay SJ, Mastovska K, Lightfield AR (2005) J AOAC Int 88:615–629

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang J, Chow W, Leung D (2010) Anal Bioanal Chem 396:1513–1538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gosetti F, Mazzucco E, Zampieri D, Gennaro MC (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3929–3937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21107094), the National High Technology R&D Program of China (The 863 Program, no. 2011AA100806), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Wang, X., Zhuang, S. et al. Enantioselective separation and simultaneous determination of fenarimol and nuarimol in fruits, vegetables, and soil by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 404, 1983–1991 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6325-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6325-8

Keywords

Navigation