Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new procedure for extraction of collagen from modern and archaeological bones for 14C dating

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bones are potentially the best age indicators in a stratigraphic study, because they are closely related to the layer in which they are found. Collagen is the most suitable fraction and is the material normally used in radiocarbon dating. Bone contaminants can strongly alter the carbon isotopic fraction values of the samples, so chemical pretreatment for 14 C dating by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is essential. The most widespread method for collagen extraction is based on the Longin procedure, which consists in HCl demineralization to dissolve the inorganic phase of the samples, followed by dissolution of collagen in a weak acid solution. In this work the possible side effects of this procedure on a modern bone are presented; the extracted collagen was analyzed by ATR-IR spectroscopy. An alternative procedure, based on use of HF instead of HCl, to minimize unwanted degradation of the organic fraction, is also given. A study by ATR-IR spectroscopic analysis of collagen collected after different demineralization times and with different acid volumes, and a study of an archaeological sample, are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hedges REM, Vanklinken GJ (1992) A review of current approaches in the pretreatment of bone for radiocarbon dating by AMS. Radiocarbon 34(3):279–291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hedges REM (2002) Bone diagenesis: an overview of processes. Archaeometry 44(3):319–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brock F et al (2010) Pre-screening techniques for identification of samples suitable for radiocarbon dating of poorly preserved bones. J Archaeol Sci 37:855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Longin R (1971) New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230:241–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Minami M et al (2004) Chemical techniques to extract organic fractions from fossil bones for accurate 14 C dating. Nucl Instrum Meth B 223–224:302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yizhaq M et al (2005) Quality controlled radiocarbon dating of bones and charcoal from the early Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) of Motza (Israel). Radiocarbon 47(2):193–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuan SX et al (2000) Comparison of different bone pretreatment methods for AMS C-14 dating. Nucl Instrum Meth B 172:424–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huls CM et al (2008) Ultrafiltration: boon or bane? Radiocarbon 51(2):613–625

    Google Scholar 

  9. Semal P, Orban R (1995) Collagen extraction from recent and fossil bones: quantitative and qualitative aspects. J Archaeol Sci 22(4):463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallop PM, Seifter S (1963) Preparation and properties of soluble collagens. Meth Enzymol 6:635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Klinken GJ (1999) Bone collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements. J Archaeol Sci 26(6):687–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beer M et al (1959) Infra-red spectra and structure of proteins. Proc R Soc Lond A 249(1):147–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deniro MJ, Weiner S (1988) Chemical, enzymatic and spectroscopic characterization of collagen and other organic fractions from prehistoric bones. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 52(9):2197–2206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcheselli G, et al. (2008) The Amphitheatre in Dürres (Albania): a contribution to the chronology of the medieval settlement using luminescence and radiocarbon dating, Int. Congress of Archeometry, poster session

  15. Reimer PJ et al (2009) IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–1150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bronk RC (2009) Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CUDaM, University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 4, 20126, Milano, Italy

    F. Maspero & M. Martini

  2. Materials Science Department, University of Milano Bicocca, Via R. Cozzi 53, 20125, Milano, Italy

    S. Sala, M. Martini & A. Papagni

  3. INFN sezione di Firenze, Via Sansone 1, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (Firenze), Italy

    M. E. Fedi

  4. INFN sezione di Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 4, 20126, Milano, Italy

    M. Martini

Authors
  1. F. Maspero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Sala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. E. Fedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Martini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Papagni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Maspero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maspero, F., Sala, S., Fedi, M.E. et al. A new procedure for extraction of collagen from modern and archaeological bones for 14C dating. Anal Bioanal Chem 401, 2019–2023 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5252-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5252-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation