Skip to main content
Log in

Accurate quantification of mercapturic acids of styrene (PHEMAs) in human urine with direct sample injection using automated column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Styrene is one of the most important industrial chemicals, with an enormously high production volume worldwide. The urinary mercapturic acids of its metabolite styrene-7,8-oxide, namely N-acetyl-S-(2-hydroxy-1-phenylethyl)-l-cysteine (PHEMA 1) and N-acetyl-S-(2-hydroxy-2-phenylethyl)-l-cysteine (PHEMA 2), are specific biomarkers for the determination of individual internal exposure to this highly reactive intermediate of styrene. We have developed and validated a fast, specific and very sensitive method for the accurate determination of the sum of phenylhydroxyethyl mercapturic acids (PHEMAs) in human urine with an automated multidimensional liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method using 13C6-labelled PHEMAs as internal standards. Analytes were stripped from the urinary matrix by online extraction on a restricted access material, transferred to the analytical column and subsequently determined by tandem mass spectrometry. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for the sum of PHEMAs was 0.3 μg/L urine and allowed us to quantify the background exposure of the (smoking) general population. Precision within series and between series ranged from 1.5 to 6.8% at three concentrations ranging from 3 to 30 μg/L urine; the mean accuracy was between 104 and 110%. We applied the method to spot urine samples from 40 subjects of the general population with no known occupational exposure to styrene. The median levels (range) for the sum of PHEMAs in urine of non-smokers (n = 22) were less than 0.3 μg/L (less than 0.3 to 1.1 μg/L), whereas in urine of smokers (n = 18), the median levels were 0.46 μg/L (less than 0.3 to 2.8 μg/L). Smokers showed a significantly higher excretion of the sum of PHEMAs (p = 0.02). Owing to its automation and high sensitivity, our method is well suited for application in occupational or environmental studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller RR, Newhook R, Poole A (1994) Crit Rev Toxicol 24(Suppl):S1–S10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cruzan G, Cushman JR, Andrews LS, Granville GC, Johnson KA, Bevan C, Hardy CJ, Coombs DW, Mullins PA, Brown WR (2001) J Appl Toxicol 21:185–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dypbukt JM, Costa LG, Manzo L, Orrenius S, Nicotera P (1992) Carcinogenesis 13:417–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vodicka P, Tvrdik T, Ostermann-Golkar S, Vodickova L, Peterkova K, Soucek P, Sarmanova J, Farmer PB, Granath F, Lambert B, Hemminki K (1999) Mutat Res 445:205–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fracasso ME, Doria D, Carrieri M, Bartolucci GB, Quintavalle S, De Rosa E (2009) Toxicol Lett 185:9–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. IARC (2002) IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 82:437–550

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campagna D, Gobba F, Mergler D, Moreau T, Galassi C, Cavalleri A, Huel G (1996) Neurotoxicology 17:367–373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Zamyslowska-Szmytke E, Szymczak W, Kotylo P, Fiszer M, Wesolowski W, Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M, Bak M, Gajda-Szadkowska A (2003) J Occup Environ Med 45:15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. IARC (1994) IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 60:321–346

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2009) List of MAK- and BAT-values 2009. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  11. Byrd GD, Fowler KW, Hicks RD, Lovette ME, Borgerding MF (1990) J Chromatogr 503:359–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Darall KG, Figgins JA, Brown RD, Phillips GF (1998) Analyst 123:1095–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Adgate JL, Eberly LE, Stroebel C, Pellizzari ED, Sexton K (2004) J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 14(Suppl 1):S4–S13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim YM, Harrad S, Harrison RM (2001) Environ Sci Technol 35:997–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SC, Lam S, Fai HK (2001) Build Environ 36:837–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooks SM, Anderson L, Emmett E, Carson A, Tsay JY, Elia V, Buncher R, Karbowsky R (1980) Arch Environ Health 35:287–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakajima T, Elovaara E, Gonzalez FJ, Gelboin HV, Raunio H, Pelkonen O, Vainio H, Aoyama T (1994) Chem Res Toxicol 7:891–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haufroid V, Jakubowski M, Janasik B, Ligocka D, Buchet JP, Bergamaschi E, Manini P, Mutti A, Ghittori S, Arand M, Hangen N, Oesch F, Hirvonen A, Lison D (2002) Pharmacogenetics 12:691–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Norström A, Löf A, Aringer L, Samuelsson R, Andersson B, Levin JO, Näslund P (1992) Chemosphere 24:1553–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seutter-Berlage F, Delbressine LP, Smeets FL, Ketelaars HC (1978) Xenobiotica 8:413–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boettcher MI, Angerer J (2005) J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 824:283–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kellert M, Scholz K, Wagner S, Dekant W, Völkel W (2006) J Chromatogr A 1131:58–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopp EK, Sieber M, Kellert M, Dekant W (2008) J Agric Food Chem 56:9828–9834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scholz K, Dekant W, Völkel W, Pähler A (2005) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 16:1976–1984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hecht SS, Villalta PW, Hochalter JB (2008) Carcinogenesis 29:937–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moriwaki H, Tsujimoto Y, Noda T, Shimizu M, Tanaka M (2000) Analyst 125:715–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Urban M, Gilch G, Schepers G, van Miert E, Scherer G (2003) J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 796:131–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Haufroid V, Lison D (2005) Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:343–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hallier E, Goergens HW, Karels H, Golka K (1995) Arch Toxicol 69:300–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maestri L, Imbriani M, Ghittori S, Capodaglio E, Gobba F, Cavalleri A (1997) Sci Total Environ 199:13–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Manini P, Andreoli R, Bergamaschi E, De Palma G, Mutti M, Niessen WMA (2000) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 14:2055–2060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fustinoni S, Campo L, Manini P, Buratti M, Waidyanatha S, De Palma G, Mutti A, Foa V, Colombi A, Rappaport SM (2008) Biomarkers 13:560–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Larsen K (1972) Clin Chim Acta 41:209–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu X, Iba MM, Weisel CP (2004) Clin Chem 50:2323–2330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schettgen T, Musiol A, Alt A, Kraus T (2008) J Chromatogr B 863:283–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schettgen T, Musiol A, Alt A, Ochsmann E, Kraus T (2009) Anal Bioanal Chem 393:969–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Manini P, Andreoli R, Mutti A (2006) Toxicol Lett 162:202–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Kerstin Gerards for her skilful analysis of urinary creatinine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Schettgen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reska, M., Ochsmann, E., Kraus, T. et al. Accurate quantification of mercapturic acids of styrene (PHEMAs) in human urine with direct sample injection using automated column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 397, 3563–3574 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3893-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3893-3

Keywords

Navigation