Skip to main content
Log in

Projection of multidimensional GC data into alternative dimensions—exploiting sample dimensionality and structured retention patterns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comprehensive multidimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is a powerful separation technique. One of the features of this technique is that it offers separations with more apparent structure than that offered by conventional one-dimensional GC (1-D GC). While some previous studies have alluded to this structure, and used structured retention patterns for some simple classifications, the topic of structured retention in GC×GC has not been studied in any great detail. Using the separation of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) on both nonpolar/polar and polar/nonpolar column sets, the interaction between the separation dimensions and the sample dimensions is explored here. The GC×GC separation of a series of compounds is presented as a projection of the sample from sample space, a p-dimensional space with dimensions defined by the dimensionality of the sample, into separation space: for GC×GC, a two-dimensional plane passing through the sample space in an orientation defined by the separation conditions. Using this conceptual model and some a priori knowledge of the sample, it is shown how the image of the sample in the separation space can be used to construct an image of the sample in alternate dimensions, such as second dimension retention factor (2k) vs. chain length in the case of FAME. These projections into alternate dimensions should facilitate the interpretation of the complex patterns found within the GC×GC chromatogram for the identification and classification of compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a–d
Fig. 3a–e
Fig. 4a–e
Fig. 5a,b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Górecki T, Harynuk J, Paniæ O (2004) J Sep Sci 27:359–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dallüge J, Beens J, Brinkman UATh (2003) J Chromatogr A 1000:69–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaines RB, Frysinger GS, Hendrick-Smith MS, Stuart JD (1999) Environ Sci Technol 33:2106–2112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson CG, Frysinger GS, Nelson RK, Gaines RB, Ohkouchi N, Reddy CM, Eglinton TI (2003) Mar Chem 83:5–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson KJ, Synovec RE (2002) Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 60:225–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fraga CG, Prazen BJ, Synovec RE (2000) J High Res Chromatogr 23:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jover E, Adahchour M, Bayona JM, Vreuls RJJ, Brinkman UATh (2005) J Chromatogr A 1086:2–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giddings JC (1995) J Chromatogr A 703:3–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giddings JC (1984) Anal Chem 56:1258A–1270A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Western RJ, Lau SSG, Marriott PJ, Nichols PD (2002) Lipids 37:715–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mondello L, Casilli A, Tranchida PQ, Dugo P, Dugo G (2003) J Chromatogr A 1019:187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyotylainen T, Kallio M, Lehtonen M, Lintonen S, Perajoki P, Jussila M, Riekkola M-L (2004) J Sep Sci 27:459–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stafford SS (ed) (1993) Electronic pressure control in gas chromatography. Hewlett-Packard, Wilmington, DE

  14. Harynuk J, Wynne PM, Marriott PJ (2006) Chromatographia (in press). DOI 10.1365/s10337-005-0714-5

  15. Mjos SA (2003) J Chromatogr A 1015:151–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mjos SA (2004) J Chromatogr A 1061:201–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the technical support from Mr. Paul Morrison and SGE International for providing some of the columns used in this study. The stay of B. Vlaeminck at the Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (RMIT University, Australia) was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research—Flanders (Belgium).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Harynuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harynuk, J., Vlaeminck, B., Zaher, P. et al. Projection of multidimensional GC data into alternative dimensions—exploiting sample dimensionality and structured retention patterns. Anal Bioanal Chem 386, 602–613 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0481-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0481-7

Keywords

Navigation