Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of a cylindrical chemosorptive denuder for sampling and phase separation of toluene diisocyanate aerosols

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cylindrical chemosorptive denuder in series with a glass fibre filter has been evaluated for sampling toluene diisocyanate (TDI) aerosols. The sampler is designed for measuring personal exposure to diisocyanates. Several denuder coatings and derivatising reagents were investigated. Dimethylpolysiloxane (SE-30) and 5% phenyl dimethylpolysiloxane (SE-54) with either dibutylamine (DBA) or dipentylamine (DPeA) as derivatising reagents yielded the lowest vapour breakthrough (the amount (%) of the vapour that passes through the denuder), close to values predicted by theory. Immobilisation of the SE-30 denuder coating by in-situ cross-linking yielded comparable results. With an SE-30/DBA-coated denuder operating within an airflow range of 100–500 mL min−1, the phase separation was shown to be consistent with theoretical predictions derived by use of the Gormley–Kennedy equation. This provides a means of calculating the vapour breakthrough and correcting experimentally obtained values with regard to vapour–particulate phase distribution, suggesting that the denuder can provide accurate phase-distribution measurements. The SE-30/DBA denuder can be used over a concentration range spanning nearly six orders of magnitude. Its capacity is sufficient to perform 15-min exposure measurements of a TDI aerosol with air concentrations as high as 1,700 μg m−3, 40 times higher than the Swedish occupational exposure limit (OEL). At the other end of the range, the estimated limit of detection (LOD) was less than 2 ng m−3 for both the vapour and the aerosol phases when LC–ESI–MS–MS was used for chemical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Streicher RP, Reh CM, Key-Schwartz RJ, Schlecht PC, Cassinelli ME, O‘Connor PF (2000) AIHAJ 61:544–556

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Febo A, Perrino C, Allegrini I (1999) Adv Environ, Ind Process Control Technol 2:127–175 (Gas and particle phase measurements of atmospheric organic compounds)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baur X (1996) Lung 174:23–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Musk AW, Peters JM, Wegman DH (1988) Am J Ind Med 13:331–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spanne M, Grzybowski P, Bohgard M (1999) AIHAJ 60:540–544

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karlsson D, Spanne M, Dalene M, Skarping G (2000) J Environ Monit 2:462–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hinds WC (1999) Aerosol technology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lane DA, Johnson ND, Barton SC, Thomas GHS, Schroeder WH (1988) Environ Sci Technol 22:941–947

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oldeweme J, Klockow D (1986) Fresenius’ Z Anal Chem 325:57–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rando RJ, Poovey HG (1994) AIHAJ 55:716–721

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rando RJ, Poovey HG (1999) AIHAJ 60:737–746

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rando RJ, Poovey HG, Mokadam DR (2002) In: Lesage J, DeGraff I, Danchik R (eds) Isocyanates sampling, analysis and health effects. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp 21–37

  13. Colmsjö A, PC-program “FSG”, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Sweden

  14. Gormley PG, Kennedy M (1949) Proc R Ir Acad 52:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mader BT, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (2001) Environ Sci Technol 35:4857–4867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferm M (1979) Atmos Environ 13:1385–1393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordqvist Y, Nilsson U, Colmsjö A, Dahl A, Gudmundsson A (2005) J Environ Monit 5:469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nordqvist Y, Melin J, Nilsson U, Johansson R, Colmsjö A (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 371:39–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nordqvist Y, Nilsson U, Colmsjö A (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 375:786–791

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melin J, Johansson R, Bemgård A, Colmsjö A (2000) AIHAJ 61:166–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spanne M, Tinnerberg H, Dalene M, Skarping G (1996) Analyst 121:1095–1999

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karlsson D, Spanne M, Dalene M, Skarping G (1998) Analyst 123:117–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Anders Gudmundsson and Andreas Dahl at the Division of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund Institute of Technology, are acknowledged for measuring the aerosol size distribution. Thanks are also due to Marianne Dalene and co-workers at the Division of Occupational Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, for kindly lending us the Y connections. Conny Östman is gratefully acknowledged for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrika Nilsson.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nordqvist, Y., Nilsson, U. & Colmsjö, A. Investigation of a cylindrical chemosorptive denuder for sampling and phase separation of toluene diisocyanate aerosols. Anal Bioanal Chem 382, 1294–1299 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3248-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3248-7

Keywords

Navigation