Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of different mass spectrometric detection techniques in the gas chromatographic analysis of pyrethroid insecticide residues in soil after microwave-assisted extraction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative study was carried out for the simultaneous determination of 11 pyrethroid insecticides in soil by gas chromatography (GC) - ion trap (IT)- mass spectrometry (MS), by means of two different ionization modes; electron impact and negative chemical ionization and three data acquisition procedures; full scan, selected ion monitoring and MS/MS. Pyrethroids investigated were tetramethrin, bifenthrin, phenothrin, λ-cyhalothrin, permethrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, flucythrinate, esfenvalerate, fluvalinate and deltamethrin. Soil samples were treated with toluene/water by microwave-assisted extraction for 9 min at 700 W and a cleaning up with florisil was performed. Clean soil samples were spiked with pyrethroids at a spiking level of 10, 25 and 50 ng/g. The method employed provides a concentration factor of 10. The ionization gas employed in the negative chemical ionization mode was methane. The use of MS/MS acquisition, in electron impact ionization, provided the best results, due to its high selectivity and sensitivity, giving very low limits of detection from 0.08 to 0.54 ng/g. In negative chemical ionization full scan and selected ion monitoring methods detection limits from 0.12 to 1.40 ng/g were found. The proposed methods were applied to several levels from 10 to 50 ng/g of spiked soils, being electron impact MS/MS method which minimizes matrix spectrum interferences and provided recovery average values from 84% to 120% with relative standard deviations which varied from 3.2 to 7.2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Extension Toxicology Network – Pesticide Information Profiles.http://www.ace.orst.edu

  2. Jin H, Webster GRH (1998) Fresenius J Anal Chem 360:573–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Safety Source for Pest Management.http://www.beyondpesticides.org

  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.http://www.epa.gov

  5. National Pesticide Telecommunications Network.http://www.ace.orst.edu

  6. Bauerle GF, Ray KL, Brodbelt JS (1995) Anal Chim Acta 317:137–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pang G, Can YZ, Fan CL, Zhang JJ, Li XM, Mu J, Wang DN, Liu SM, Song WB, Li HP, Wong SS, Kubinec R, Tekel J, Tahotna S (2000) J Chromatogr A 882:231–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Esteve-Turrillas FA, Aman CS, Pastor A, de la Guardia M (2004) Anal Chim Acta 522:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasin M, Baugh PJ, Bonwick GA, Davies DH, Hancock P, Leinoudi M (1996) J Chromatogr A 754:235–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandalakis M, Tsapakis M, Stephanou EG (2001) J Chromatogr A 925:183–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gamón M, Lleó C, Ten A (2001) J AOAC Int 84:1209–1216

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lehotay SJ, Lightfield AR, Harman-Fetcho JA, Donoghue DJ (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:4589–4596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pirnay S, Ricordel I, Libong D, Bouchonnet S (2002) J Chromatogr A. 954:235–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee WW, Oh CH, Kim PS, Yang M, Song K (2003) Int J Mass Spectrom 230:25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xcalibur Manuals. Finnigan (Bellefonte, USA)

  16. Santos FJ, Galceran MT (2003) J Chromatogr A 1000:125–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinez Vidal JL, Arrebola FJ, Mateu-Sánchez M (2002) Rapid Commum Mass Spectrom 16:1106–1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Arrebola FJ, Martinez Vidal JL, Mateu-Sánchez M, Álvarez-Castellón FJ (2003) Anal Chim Acta 484:167–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garrido-Frenich A, Arrebola FJ, González-Rodríguez MJ, Vidal JL, Mora Díez N (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 377:1038–1046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arrebola FJ, Martinez Vidal JL, González-Rodríguez MJ, Garrido-Frenich A, Sánchez Morito N (2003) J Chromatogr A 1005:131–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. González-Rodríguez MJ, Garrido-Frenich A, Arrebola FJ, Martinez Vidal JL (2002) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 16:1216–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez Vidal JL, González-Rodríguez MJ, Arrebola FJ, Garrido-Frenich A, Sánchez López FJ (2003) J AOAC Int 86:856–867

    Google Scholar 

  23. Agüera A, Contreras M, Crespo J, Fernández-Alba AR (2002) Analyst 127:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lehotay SJ (2000) J AOAC Int 83:680–697

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonçalves C, Alpendurada MF (2004) J Chromatogr A 1026:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haib J, Hofer I, Renaud JM (2003) J Chromatogr A 1020:173–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (PPQ2000-0816) and F.A.E.T. the “V Segles” grant provided by the Universitat de València to carry out this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agustín Pastor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esteve-Turrillas, F.A., Pastor, A. & de la Guardia, M. Comparison of different mass spectrometric detection techniques in the gas chromatographic analysis of pyrethroid insecticide residues in soil after microwave-assisted extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem 384, 801–809 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0209-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0209-0

Keywords

Navigation