Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kinetic substrate quantification by fitting the enzyme reaction curve to the integrated Michaelis–Menten equation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reliability of kinetic substrate quantification by nonlinear fitting of the enzyme reaction curve to the integrated Michaelis–Menten equation was investigated by both simulation and preliminary experimentation. For simulation, product absorptivity ε was 3.00 mmol−1 L cm−1 and Km was 0.10 mmol L−1, and uniform absorbance error σ was randomly inserted into the error-free reaction curve of product absorbance Ai versus reaction time ti calculated according to the integrated Michaelis–Menten equation \( \ln \left[ {Am/\left( {Am - Ai} \right)} \right] + Ai/\left( {\varepsilon \times Km} \right) = \left( {Vm/Km} \right) \times ti \). The experimental reaction curve of arylesterase acting on phenyl acetate was monitored by phenol absorbance at 270 nm. Maximal product absorbance Am was predicted by nonlinear fitting of the reaction curve to Eq. (1) with Km as constant. There were unique Am for best fitting of both the simulated and experimental reaction curves. Neither the error in reaction origin nor the variation of enzyme activity changed the background-corrected value of Am. But the range of data under analysis, the background absorbance, and absorbance error σ had an effect. By simulation, Am from 0.150 to 3.600 was predicted with reliability and linear response to substrate concentration when there was 80% consumption of substrate at σ of 0.001. Restriction of absorbance to 0.700 enabled Am up to 1.800 to be predicted at σ of 0.001. Detection limit reached Am of 0.090 at σ of 0.001. By experimentation, the reproducibility was 4.6% at substrate concentration twice the Km, and Am linearly responded to phenyl acetate with consistent absorptivity for phenol, and upper limit about twice the maximum of experimental absorbance. These results supported the reliability of this new kinetic method for enzymatic analysis with enhanced upper limit and precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Km :

Michaelis–Menten constant of the tool enzyme

Vm :

Maximum reaction rate of enzyme

Am :

The maximum of product absorbance

ti :

Specified reaction time

Ai :

Product absorbance at specified reaction time

σ:

Random absorbance error

Pi :

Product concentration at specified reaction time

CV:

Coefficient of variation

Qmin :

Least sum of the residual squares for the fitting

R2 :

Determination coefficient

Wi :

Weighting factor for each datum during the fitting

ε:

Millimolar absorptivity of product

References

  1. Guilbault GG (1976) Handbook of enzymatic methods of analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York

  2. Gould BJ, Lukas BF (1985) Enzymes for clinical analysis. In: Wiseman A (ed) Handbook of enzyme biotechnology, 2nd edn. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

  3. Sampson EJ, Baird MA (1979) Clin Chem 25:1721–1729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mieling GE, Pardue HL (1978) Anal Chem 50:1611–1618

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mieling GE, Pardue HL, Thompson JE, et al (1979) Clin Chem 25:1581–1590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris RC, Hultman E (1983) Clin Chem 29:2079–2081

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton SD, Pardue HL (1982) Clin Chem 28:2359–2365

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liao F, Liu W-L, Zhou Q-X, Zeng Z-C, Zuo Y-P (2001) Clin Chim Acta 314:67–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laidler KJ, Bunting PS (1973) The chemical kinetics of enzyme reaction, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  10. Orsi BA, Tipton KF (1979) Methods Enzymol 63:159–183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gan KN, Smolen A, Eckerson HW, La Du BN (1991) Drug Metab Dispos 19:100–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller JC, Miller JN (1988) Statistics for analytical chemistry, 2nd edn. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

  13. Baywenton PR (1986) Data processing and error analysis. Knowledge Press, Beijing

  14. Atkins GL, Nimmo IA (1973) Biochem J 135:779–784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  16. del Rio FJ, Riu J, Rius FX (2001) Analyst 126:1113–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liao F, Wang J-H, Zeng Z-C, Kang G-F, Zuo Y-P, et al (2003) Disan Junyi Daxue Xuebao 25, in press

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30200266).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liao, F., Tian, KC., Yang, X. et al. Kinetic substrate quantification by fitting the enzyme reaction curve to the integrated Michaelis–Menten equation. Anal Bioanal Chem 375, 756–762 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1829-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1829-x

Keywords

Navigation