Abstract
We report full-dimensional state-to-state quantum mechanical (QM) and quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) calculations on the title reaction for the ground rovibrational initial state with total angular momentum fixed at zero on the accurate potential energy (PES) constructed recently by using permutation-invariant polynomial–neural network method (Li et al. in J Chem Phys 140:044327, 2014), to check the validity of the QCT method for the reaction. It is found that the QM state-to-state results strongly depend on the resonance structures in reaction, but the collision energy-averaged results show a smooth change with the increase of collision energy. Overall, the agreement between collision energy-averaged QM and QCT state-to-state results is satisfactory, in particular at high collision energy region, indicating that the QCT method is rather accurate on describing dynamics of the reaction on the PES. On the other hand, because earlier studies revealed the QCT results on the PES do not agree very well with the experimental measurements available, more theoretical and experimental studies should be carried out to achieve a full understanding on the dynamics of this benchmark complex-forming reaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Finlayson-Pitts BJ, Pitts JN (2000) Chemistry of the upper and lower atmosphere. Academic press, San Diego
Miller JA, Kee RJ, Westbrook CK (1990) Annu Rev Phys Chem 41:345–387
Ravishankara AR, Thompson RL (1983) Chem Phys Lett 99:377–381
Frost MJ, Sharkey P, Smith IWM (1991) Faraday Discuss Chem Soc 91:305–317
Golden DM, Smith GP, McEwen AB, Yu CL, Eiteneer B, Frenklach M, Vaghjiani GL, Ravishankara AR, Tully FP (1998) J Phys Chem A 102:8598–8606
Alagia M, Balucani N, Casavecchia P, Stranges D, Volpi GG (1993) J Chem Phys 98:8341
Casavecchia P, Balucani N, Volpi GG (1995) Chemical dynamics and kinetics of small free radicals, part I. In: Wagner AF, Liu K (eds) World Scientific, Singapore
Schatz GC, Fitzcharles MS, Harding LB (1987) Faraday Discuss Chem Soc 84:359–369
Kudla K, Schatz GC, Wagner AF (1991) J Chem Phys 95:1635
Bradley KS, Schatz GC (1997) J Chem Phys 106:8464
Yu HG, Muckerman JT, Sears TJ (2001) Chem Phys Lett 349:547–554
Lakin MJ, Troya D, Schatz GC, Harding LB (2003) J Chem Phys 119:5848
Valero R, van Hemert MC, Kroes GJ (2004) Chem Phys Lett 393:236–244
Li J, Wang Y, Jiang B, Ma J, Dawes R, Xie D, Bowman JM, Guo H (2012) J Chem Phys 136:041103
Li J, Xie C, Ma J, Wang Y, Dawes R, Xie D, Bowman JM, Guo H (2012) J Phys Chem A 116:5057–5067
Bowman JM, Czakó G, Fu B (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:8094
Behler J (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:17930
Chen J, Xu X, Zhang DH (2013) J Chem Phys 138:221104
Jiang B, Guo H (2013) J Chem Phys 139:054112
Li J, Jiang B, Guo H (2013) J Chem Phys 139:204103
Li J, Chen J, Zhang DH, Guo H (2014) J Chem Phys 140:044327
Zhang DH, Zhang JZH (1995) J Chem Phys 103:6512
Valero R, McCormack DA, Kroes GJ (2004) J Chem Phys 120:4263
Medvedev DM, Gray SK, Goldfield EM, Lakin MJ, Troya D, Schatz GC (2004) J Chem Phys 120:1231
Liu S, Xu X, Zhang DH (2012) Theor Chem Acc 131:1068
Ma J, Li J, Guo H (2012) J Phys Chem Lett 3:2482–2486
Liu S, Xu X, Zhang DH (2011) J Chem Phys 135:141108
Wang C, Liu S, Zhang DH (2012) Chem Phys Lett 537:16–20
Xiao C, Xu X, Liu S, Wang T, Dong W, Yang T, Sun Z, Dai D, Zhang DH, Yang X (2011) Science 333:440
Liu S, Xu X, Zhang DH (2012) J Chem Phys 136:144302
García E, Saracibar A, Zuazo L, Laganà A (2007) Chem Phys 332:162–175
García E, Corchado JC, Espinosa-García J (2012) J Comput Theor Chem 990:47–52
Corchado JC, Espinosa-García J, Li J, Guo H (2013) J Phys Chem A 117:11648–11654
Xie C, Li J, Xie D, Guo H (2012) J Chem Phys 137:024308
Althorpe SC, Kouri DJ, Hoffman DK (1997) J Chem Phys 106:7629–7636
Cvitaš MT, Althorpe SC (2009) J Phys Chem A 113:4557–4569
Cvitaš MT, Althorpe SC (2011) J Chem Phys 134:024309
Zhang DH, Zhang JZH (1994) J Chem Phys 101:1146
Zhang DH, Light JC (1996) J Chem Phys 104:4544–4553
Rose ME (1957) Elementary theory of angular momentum. Wiley, New York
Hase WL, Duchovic RJ, Hu X, Komornicki A, Lim KF, Lu DH, Peslherbe GH, Swamy KN, Linde SRV, Varandas A, Wang H, Wolf RJ (1996) Quantum Chem Prog Exch Bull 16:671
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 90921014), Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2013CB834601), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to Professor Guosen Yan and published as part of the special collection of articles celebrating his 85th birthday.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Chen, J., Fu, B. et al. State-to-state quantum versus classical dynamics study of the OH + CO → H + CO2 reaction in full dimensions (J = 0): checking the validity of the quasi-classical trajectory method. Theor Chem Acc 133, 1558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-014-1558-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-014-1558-6