Abstract
We discuss the failure of commonly used AM1 and PM3 semiempirical methods to correctly describe acid dissociation. We focus our analysis on HCl because of its physicochemical importance and its relevance in atmospheric chemistry. The structure of non-dissociated and dissociated HCl – (H2O) n clusters is accounted for. The very bad results obtained with PM3 (and also with AM1) are related to large errors in gas-phase proton affinity of water and gas-phase acidity of HCl. Indeed, estimation of pKa values shows that neither AM1 nor PM3 are able to predict HCl dissociation in liquid water since HCl is found to be a weaker acid than H3O+. We have proposed in previous works a modified PM3 approach (PM3-MAIS) adapted to intermolecular calculations. It is derived from PM3 by reparameterization of the core–core functions using ab initio data. Since parameters for H–Cl and O–Cl core–core interactions were not yet available, we have carried out the corresponding optimization. Application of the PM3-MAIS method to HCl dissociation in HCl–(H2O) n clusters leads to a huge improvement over PM3 results. Though the method predicts a slightly overestimated HCl acidity in water environment, the overall agreement with ab initio calculations is very satisfying and justifies efforts to develop new semiempirical methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gao J (1996) In: Reviews in computational chemistry, Vol. 7 (Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB, eds.), VCH Publishers, pp. 119
Gao J, Luque FJ, Orozco M (1993). J Chem Phys 98: 2975
Liu H, Müller-Plathe F, van Gunsteren WF (1995). J Chem Phys 102: 1722
Cui Q, Guo H, Karplus M (2002). J Chem Phys 117: 5617
Bredow T, Jug K (2005). Theor Chem Acc 113: 1
Csonka GI, Angyán J (1997). J Mol Struct (Theochem) 393: 31
Bernal-Uruchurtu MI, Martins-Costa MTC, Millot C, Ruiz-López MF (2000). J Comput Chem 21: 572
Harb W, Bernal-Uruchurtu MI, Ruiz-López MF (2004). Theor Chem Acc 112: 204
Burk P, Herodes K, Koppel I, Koppel I (1993). Int J Quantum Chem 48: 633
Burk P, Koppel I (1993). Theor Chem Acc 86: 417
Ozment JL, Schmiedekamp AM (1992). Int J Quantum Chem 43: 783
Lambert A, Regnouf-de-Vains JB, Rinaldi D, Ruiz-López MF (2006). J Phys Org Chem 19: 157
Clark T (2000). J Mol Struct (Theochem) 530: 1
Winget P, Selcuki C, Horn AHC, Martin B, Clark T (2003). Theor Chem Acc 110: 254
López X, York DM, Dejaegere A, Karplus M (2002). Int J Quantum Chem 86: 10
Repasky MP, Chandrasekhar J, Jorgensen JW (2002). J Comput Chem 23: 1601
Tubert-Brohman I, Werneck Guimarães CR, Repasky MP, Jorgensen WL (2004). J Comp Chem 25: 138
Martin B, Clark T (2006). Int J Quantum Chem 106: 1208
Dewar MJS, Zoebisch EG, Healy E, Stewart JJP (1985). J Am Chem Soc 107: 3902
Stewart JJP (1989). J Comput Chem 10: 209
Bernal-Uruchurtu MI, Ruiz-López MF (2000). Chem Phys Lett 330: 118
Mantz YA, Geiger FM, Molina LT, Molina MJ, Trout BL (2001). J Phys Chem A 105: 7037
Buesnel R, Hillier I, Masters HAJ (1995). Chem Phys Lett 247: 391
Lee C, Sosa C, Planas M, Novoa JJ (1996). J Chem Phys 104: 8
Estrin DA, Kohanoff J, Laria DH, Weht RO (1997). Chem Phys Lett 280: 280
Ando K, Hynes JT (1997). J Phys Chem B 101: 10464
Bacelo DA, Binning RCJ, Ishikawa Y (1999). J Phys Chem A 103: 4631
Svanberg M, Pettersson JBC, Bolton K (2000). J Phys Chem A 104: 5787
Milet A, Struniewicz C, Moszynski R, Wormer PES (2001). J Chem Phys 115: 349
Chaban GM, Benny Gerber RB, Janda KC (2001). J Phys Chem A 105: 8323
Gilligan JJ, Castleman AWJ (2001). J Phys Chem A 105: 5601
Bolton K, Pettersson JBC (2001). J Am Chem Soc 123: 7360
Uras-Aytemiz N, Joyce C, Devlin JP (2001). J Phys Chem A 105: 10497
Cabaleiro-Lago E, Hermida-Ramón JM, Rodríguez-Otero J (2002). J Chem Phys 117: 3160
Huneycutt AJ, Stickland RJ, Hellberg F, Saykally RJ (2003). J Chem Phys 118: 1221
Botti A, Bruni F, Imberti S, Ricci MA, Soper AK (2004). J Chem Phys 121: 7840
Ortega IK, Escribano R, Fernández-Torre D, Herrero VJ, Maté B, Moreno MA (2004). Chem Phys Lett 396: 335
Odde S, Mhin BJ, Lee S, Lee HM, Kim KS (2004). J Chem Phys 120: 9525
Botti A, Bruni F, Ricci MA, Soper AK (2006). J Chem Phys 125: 014508
Kisiel Z, Bialkowska-Jaworska E, Pszczolkowski L, Milet A, Struniewicz C, Moszynski M, Sadlej J (2000). J Chem Phys 112: 5767
Chipot C, Gorb L, Rivail JL (1994). J Phys Chem 98: 1601
Sobolewski AL, Domcke W (2003). J Phys Chem A 107: 1557
Buesnel R, Hillier IH, Masters AJ (1995). Chem Phys Lett 247: 391
Pastor N, Ortega-Blake I (1993). J Chem Phys 99: 7899
Giese TJ, York DM (2005). J Chem Phys 123: 164108
Alikhani ME, Silvi B (2003). Phys Chem Chem Phys 5: 2494
Weimann M, Fárnýk M, Suhm MA (2002). Phys Chem Chem Phys 4: 3933
Lias SG, Bartmess JE, Liebman JF, Holmes JL, Levin RD, Mallard WG (1988) J Phys Chem Ref Data 17, Suppl.1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arillo-Flores, O.I., Ruiz-López, M.F. & Bernal-Uruchurtu, M.I. Can semi-empirical models describe HCl dissociation in water?. Theor Chem Account 118, 425–435 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0280-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0280-z