Skip to main content
Log in

Self-administration of cocaine–remifentanil mixtures by monkeys: an isobolographic analysis

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Abuse of mixtures of stimulants and opioids (“speedball”) is common. Although this combination has been studied in the laboratory, conclusions about the nature of the cocaine/opioid interaction have been mixed.

Objectives

The objectives of the present experiment were to allow monkeys to self-administer mixtures of cocaine and the μ opioid agonist remifentanil and to quantify the interaction using the isobolographic approach. Our hypothesis was that the drugs would be super-additive in their reinforcing effects.

Materials and methods

Rhesus monkeys (n = 5) prepared with i.v. catheters were allowed to self-administer cocaine or saline under a progressive-ratio schedule. When responding was stable, doses of cocaine or remifentanil were made available in test sessions. Next, mixtures of doses of the drugs were tested over a range of doses in 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1 ratios of their ED50s. Results were analyzed using isobolographic techniques.

Results

Both drugs alone and all drug mixtures functioned as positive reinforcers in a dose-related manner. Cocaine maintained more responding at maximum than did remifentanil, i.e., was a stronger reinforcer. The experimentally determined equi-effective dose for the 1:1 and 1:2 cocaine/remifentanil mixtures tended toward super-additivity, but the difference from additivity did not achieve statistical significance. The 2:1 mixture was super-additive. Maximum responding maintained by the mixtures was higher than that maintained by remifentanil but not different from cocaine.

Conclusions

Combinations of cocaine and remifentanil can be additive or super-additive as positive reinforcers, depending on proportions of each. Interactions between stimulants and opioids may contribute to the abuse of these mixtures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Duvauchelle CL, Sapoznik T, Kornetsky C (1998) The synergistic effects of combining cocaine and heroin (“speedball”) using a progressive-ratio schedule of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 61:297–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grabovsky Y, Tallarida RJ (2004) Isobolographic analysis for combinations of a full and partial agonist: curved isoboles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310:981–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Findley JD, Brady JV, Dolan-Gutcher K, Robinson WW (1975) Comparison of progressive-ratio performance maintained by cocaine, methylphenidate and secobarbital. Psychopharmacologia 43:81–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Brady JV, Snell JD (1978) Progressive-ratio performance maintained by drug infusions: comparison of cocaine, diethylpropion, chlorphentermine, and fenfluramine. Psychopharmacology 56:5–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemby SE, Smith JE Dworkin SI (1996) The effects of eticlopride and naltrexone on responding maintained by food, cocaine, heroin and cocaine/heroin combinations in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277:1247–1258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister F (1979) Progressive-ratio performance in the rhesus monkey maintained by opiate infusions. Psychopharmacology 62:181–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko MC, Terner J, Hursh S, Woods JH, Winger G (2002) Relative reinforcing effects of three opioids with different durations of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:698–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leri F, Bruneau J, Stewart J (2003) Understanding polydrug use: review of heroin and cocaine co-use. Addiction 98:7–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe O (1953) The problem of synergism and antagonism of combined drugs. Arzneim-Forsch 3:285–290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattox AJ, Thompson SS, Carroll ME (1997) Smoked heroin and cocaine base (speedball) combinations in rhesus monkeys. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 5:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mello NK, Negus SS, Lukas SE, Mendelson JH, Sholar JW, Driese J (1995) A primate model of polydrug abuse: cocaine and heroin combinations. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:1325–1337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negus SS (2005) Interactions between the reinforcing effects of cocaine and heroin in a drug-vs-foot choice procedure in rhesus monkeys: a dose-addition analysis. Psychopharmacology 180:115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranaldi R, Munn E (1998) Polydrug self-administration in rats: cocaine–heroin is more reinforcing than cocaine alone. Neuroreport 9:2463–2466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Woolverton WL (1997) Self-administration of cocaine and heroin combinations by rhesus monkeys under a progressive-ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology 133:363–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Massey BW, Kleven MS, Woolverton WL (1996) Parametric analysis of cocaine self-administration under a progressive-ratio schedule in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 125:361–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Wilcox KM, Woolverton WL (1998) Self-administration of cocaine–heroin combinations by rhesus monkeys: antagonism by naltrexone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286:61–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Rodefer JS, Spealman RD (2005) Self-administration of cocaine–opioid combinations by rhesus monkeys: evaluation of the role of m receptor efficacy using labor supply analysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 312:1289–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Platt DM, Wei-Dong Y, Spealman RD (2007) Modulation of heroin and cocaine self-administration by dopamine D1- and D2-like receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 321:1135–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JE, Co C, Coller MD, Hemby SE, Martin TJ (2006) Self-administered heroin and cocaine combinations in the rat: additive reinforcing effects-supra-additive effects on nucleus accumbens extracellular dopamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:139–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tallarida RJ (2000) Drug synergism and dose–effect data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallarida RJ (2006) An overview of drug combination analysis with isobolograms. Perspectives in pharmacology. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 319:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tallarida RJ (2007) Interactions between drugs and occupied receptors. Pharmacol Ther 113:197–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Woolverton WL (2007) Self-administration of cocaine–antihistamine combinations: super-additive reinforcing effects. Eur J Pharmacol 557:159–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang NS, Brown VL, Grabowski J, Meisch RA (2001) Reinforcement by orally delivered methadone, cocaine, and methadone–cocaine combinations in rhesus monkeys: are the combinations better reinforcers? Psychopharmacology 156:63–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward SJ, Morgan D, Roberts DCS (2005) Comparison of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and cocaine/heroin combinations under progressive ratio and choice schedules in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:286–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wee S, Carroll FI, Woolverton WL (2006) A reduced rate of in vivo dopamine transporter binding is associated with lower relative reinforcing efficacy of stimulants. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:351–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wessinger WD (1986) Approaches to the study of drug interactions in behavioral pharmacology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 10:103–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox KM, Rowlett JK, Paul IA, Ordway GA, Woolverton WL (2000) On the relationship between the dopamine transporter and the reinforcing effects of local anesthetics in rhesus monkeys: Practical and theoretical concerns. Psychopharmacology 153:139–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winger G (1993) Fixed-ratio and time-out changes on behavior maintained by cocaine or methohexital in rhesus monkeys. Exp Clin Psychopharm 1:142–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winger G, Galuska CM, Hursh SR, Woods JH (2006) Relative reinforcing effects of cocaine, remifentanil, and their combination in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 318:223–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL (1987) Analysis of drug interactions in behavioral pharmacology. In: Thompson T, Dews PB, Barrett JE (eds) Neurobehavioral pharmacology Vol. 6. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, pp. 275–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL, Wang Z, Vasterling T, Carroll FI, Tallarida R (2008) Self-administration of drug mixtures by monkeys: combining drugs with comparable mechanisms of action. Psychopharmacology 196:575–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All animal-use procedures were approved by the University of Mississippi Medical Center’s Animal Care and Use Committee and were in accordance with the National Research Council’s Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996). The authors have no financial relationship with the organization that sponsored this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. L. Woolverton.

Additional information

This study was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse grants R01-DA019471 and K05-DA15343 (W.L.W.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woolverton, W.L., Wang, Z., Vasterling, T. et al. Self-administration of cocaine–remifentanil mixtures by monkeys: an isobolographic analysis. Psychopharmacology 198, 387–394 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1152-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1152-5

Keywords

Navigation