Abstract
In this paper we consider a class of evolution operators with coefficients depending on time and space variables \((t,x) \in {\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n\), where \({\mathbb {T}}\) is the one-dimensional torus, and prove necessary and sufficient conditions for their global solvability in (time-periodic) Gelfand–Shilov spaces. The argument of the proof is based on a characterization of these spaces in terms of the eigenfunction expansions given by a fixed self-adjoint, globally elliptic differential operator on \({\mathbb {R}}^n\).
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Global solvability for evolution operators with periodic coefficients is a huge field of investigation which counts many contributions, see for instance [1, 11,12,13, 29, 30, 35]. In the most part of situations, this problem is strictly connected with the one of the global hypoellipticity. In the above mentioned papers, the operators under consideration have coefficients which are periodic with respect to both time and space variables (t, x) or just with respect to t and independent from x. Hence, the coefficients are defined on the torus (or on products of tori). More recently, the problem of solvability has been investigated also in other compact settings with special attention to Lie groups, e.g. [3, 4, 31, 32]. In particular, we point out that an important tool, present in all these references and here, is a Fourier analysis characterizing the functional spaces under investigation.
The aim of this paper is to discuss global solvability for operators of the form
where \(D_t = i^{-1}\partial _t\), the coefficient \(c(t)=a(t)+ib(t)\) is complex-valued and belongs to some Gevrey class \({\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma }({\mathbb {T}})\), \(\sigma >1\), cf. Sect. 2, and \(P(x, D_x)\) is a self-adjoint differential operator of type
of order \(m\ge 2\), satisfying the global ellipticity property
Before treating in detail the evolution operator (1), let us consider the operator P in (2). Self-adjointness and condition (3) imply that P has a discrete spectrum consisting in a sequence of real eigenvalues \(\lambda _j\) such that \(|\lambda _j| \rightarrow \infty \) for \(j \rightarrow \infty \) and satisfying
for some positive constant \(\rho \). Moreover, the eigenfunctions of P form an orthonormal basis of \(L^2({\mathbb {R}}^n)\). The most relevant example is the Harmonic oscillator \(P(x,D)= |x|^2-\Delta , \) where \(\Delta \) denotes the standard Laplace operator on \({\mathbb {R}}^n\). Such operators and their pseudodifferential generalizations have been deeply studied on the Schwartz space \({\mathscr {S}}({\mathbb {R}}^n)\) of smooth rapidly decreasing functions and on the dual space of tempered distributions \({\mathscr {S}}'({\mathbb {R}}^n)\), cf. [38]. More recently, however, it has been shown that a more appropriate functional setting for such operators is given by the so-called Gelfand–Shilov spaces of type \({\mathscr {S}}\), introduced in [24, 25] as an alternative setting to the Schwartz space for the study of partial differential equations.
Given \(\mu>0, \nu >0\), the Gelfand–Shilov space \({\mathcal {S}}^\mu _\nu ({\mathbb {R}}^n)\) is defined as the space of all \(f \in C^\infty ({\mathbb {R}}^n)\) such that
for some \(A>0\), or equivalently,
for some \(C,c>0\). Elements of \({\mathcal {S}}^\mu _\nu ({\mathbb {R}}^n)\) are then smooth functions presenting uniform analytic or Gevrey estimates on \({\mathbb {R}}^n\) and admitting an exponential decay at infinity. The elements of the dual space \(({\mathcal {S}}^\mu _\nu )'({\mathbb {R}}^n)\) are commonly known as temperate ultradistributions, cf. [36].
In the last two decades, Gelfand–Shilov spaces have become very popular in the study of microlocal and time-frequency analysis with many applications to partial differential equations, see for instance [5,6,7,8, 16, 18,19,20,21,22,23, 33, 37] and the references quoted therein. Concerning in particular the operators in (2), (3), we mention the hypoellipticity results in [18, 19] which show that the solutions \(u \in {\mathscr {S}}'({\mathbb {R}}^n)\) of the equation \(Pu=f \in {\mathcal {S}}_\nu ^\mu ({\mathbb {R}}^n)\) actually belong to \({\mathcal {S}}_\nu ^\mu ({\mathbb {R}}^n)\). In particular, the eigenfunctions of P are in \({\mathcal {S}}^{1/2}_{1/2}({\mathbb {R}}^n)\). Recently, these spaces have been also characterized in terms of eigenfunction expansions, see [17, 26].
In the paper [9], we introduced the time-periodic Gelfand–Shilov spaces \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n)\) with \(\sigma \ge 1, \mu \ge 1/2\), (\({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }\) in short), as the space of all smooth functions on \({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n\) such that
is finite for some positive constant C, and we studied the global hypoellipticity of the operator L in (1) in this setting. Notice that the elements of \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu }({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n)\) belong to the symmetric Gelfand–Shilov spaces \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }^{\mu } ({\mathbb {R}}^n)\), cf. [24, 25], with respect to the variable x, while are Gevrey regular and periodic in t.
In order to achieve our result we adapted to the periodic setting a characterization of classical Gelfand–Shilov spaces in terms of eigenfunction expansions proved in [26]. Precisely, the orthonormal basis of eigenfunctions \(\{\varphi _j \}_{j \in {\mathbb {N}}}\) of P allows to write any \(u \in {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n)\) (respectively \(u \in {\mathcal {S}}'_{\sigma ,\mu }({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n)\)) as the sum of a Fourier series
where \(u_j(t)\) is a sequence of Gevrey functions (respectively distributions) on the torus satisfying suitable exponential estimates. This allowed to discretize the equation \(Lu=f\) and to apply the typical arguments of the analysis on the torus. The results proved in [9] will be also used in the present paper and for this reason they are briefly recalled in Sect. 2.
Let us now come to the main results of the paper. In order to introduce a suitable notion of global solvability for our problem, let us consider the space
Definition 1
The operator L is said to be \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable if for every \(f \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) there exists a solution \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) of the equation \(Lu=f\).
Remark 1
As we shall notice in the next Lemma 4, the condition \(Lu=f \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) imposes some constraints on the Fourier coefficients of f. For this reason, in Sect. 3 we shall modify the notion of global solvability given above by assuming f to belong to a suitable subspace of admissible functions, cf. Definition 2 below.
As standard in this type of problems, the solvability of the operator is strictly conditioned by the behavior of the imaginary part b(t) of the coefficient c(t) and in particular by its sign changing. Namely, denoting
we have that when the sign of b is constant, some algebraic conditions, called Diophantine conditions, on \(c_0\) (or rather on \(a_0\)) appear, whereas when b changes sign the global solvability is related with the topological properties of the sets
and with the size of the set
The main result of this paper reads as follows.
Theorem 1
Let L be defined by (1), (2), with P self-adjoint and satisfying (3). Then:
-
(a)
if b does not change sign, then L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable if and only if either \(b \not \equiv 0\) or \(b \equiv 0\) and \(a_0\) satisfies the following condition:
\(({\mathscr {A}})\) for every \(\epsilon >0\) there exists \(C_{\epsilon }>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} | \tau - a_0\lambda _j| \geqslant C_{\epsilon } \exp \left( -\epsilon j^{\frac{1}{2n\mu }}\right) , \end{aligned}$$for all \((\tau , j) \in {\mathbb {Z}}\times {\mathbb {N}}\), such that \(\tau - c_0\lambda _j \ne 0\).
-
(b)
if b changes sign, then L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable if and only if \({\mathcal {Z}}^C={\mathbb {N}}\setminus {\mathcal {Z}}\) is finite and the sets \(\Omega _r\) in (6) are connected for all \(r \in {\mathbb {R}}\).
Greenfield and Wallach have first observed the presence of Diophantine approximations in this type of investigations, see [27]. Diophantine conditions have then widely explored in the context of periodic operators, as the reader can see in [10, 14, 27, 29, 35] and the references therein. Concerning the connectedness conditions in (b), it was introduced first by Treves in [40] and it frequently appears in the study of global solvability on the torus, see for instance [11,12,13].
Remark 2
As we shall see in Sect. 4 the proof of Theorem 1 relies on a suitable characterization of time-periodic Gelfand–Shilov spaces in terms of eigenfunction expansions proved in [26]. Notice that in the same paper an analogous characterization has been proved for the Schwartz spaces \({\mathscr {S}}({\mathbb {R}}^n), {\mathscr {S}}'({\mathbb {R}}^n).\) Hence it would be natural to investigate global hypoellipticity and solvability for the operator L in spaces of functions which are periodic (and smooth or Gevrey) in t and are Schwartz functions in x. Such spaces have started to be considered in this type of investigations very recently, cf. [34], but there are no results yet concerning the operator L in (1).
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we introduce time-periodic Gelfand–Shilov spaces and their characterization in terms of eigenfunction expansions. Moreover, we discretize the equation \(Lu=f\) reducing it to a family of ordinary differential equations involving the Fourier coefficients of u and f. Finally, we recall the results obtained in [9] about global hypoellipticity. In Sect. 3 we make some preparation to the proof of Theorem 1. Namely, we introduce a space of admissible functions f out of which global solvability cannot be obtained and relate it to the kernel of the transpose operator \(^tL\). Moreover, we prove necessary and sufficient conditions for global solvability in the case when the coefficient c(t) is constant. Then we start to treat the case of time depending coefficients and show that it is possible to reduce L to a normal form via a suitable transformation. In Sect. 4 we prove Theorem 1. The proof consists in several steps and the strategy is the following: first, we verify the sufficiency part in Theorem 14. The analysis of the necessity part is the focus of Sect. 4.2. The algebraic conditions are given by Propositions 15, 16, and 17. Finally, the topological condition on \(\Omega _{r}\) is verified by Theorem 18.
2 Notations and preliminary results
Let us start by recalling some basic properties of the spaces \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu }\) and \({\mathcal {S}}'_{\sigma , \mu }\).
2.1 Time-periodic Gelfand–Shilov spaces and eigenfunction expansions
Throughout the paper we denote by \({\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma ,h}({\mathbb {T}})\), \(h>0\) and \(\sigma \ge 1\), the space of all smooth functions \(\varphi \in C^\infty ({\mathbb {T}})\) such that there exists \(C>0\) satisfying
Hence, \({\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma ,h}({\mathbb {T}})\) is a Banach space endowed with the norm
and the space of periodic Gevrey functions of order \(\sigma \) is defined by
Its dual space will be denoted by \(({\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma })'({\mathbb {T}})\).
Similarly, fixed \(\sigma \ge 1, \mu \ge 1/2, C>0\) and denoting by \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu , C}\) the space of all smooth functions on \({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n\) for which the norm (5) is finite, it is easy to prove that \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu , C}\) is a Banach space and we can endow \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu } = \bigcup _{C> 0} {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu ,C}\) with the inductive limit topology
We shall then denote by \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu }'\) the space of all linear continuous forms \(u: {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu } \rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}\).
Remark 3
By [26, Lemma 3.1] an equivalent norm to (5) on \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu ,C}\) is given by the following:
In order to take advantage of the properties of P, in the proof of Theorem 18 we will use the norm (8) rather than (5).
Now we want to recover the Fourier analysis presented in [9]. With this purpose we recall the characterization of \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma , \mu }\) and \({\mathcal {S}}'_{\sigma , \mu }\) in terms of eigenfunction expansions. For this, let \(\varphi _j \in {\mathcal {S}}_{1/2}^{1/2}({\mathbb {R}}^n), j \in {\mathbb {N}}\), be the eigenfunctions of the operator P in (2). We have the following results.
Theorem 2
Let \(\mu \ge 1/2\) and \(\sigma \ge 1\) and let \(u \in {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }'\). Then \(u \in {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }\) if and only if it can be represented as
where
and there exist \(C >0\) and \(\epsilon >0\) such that
Proof
See [9, Theorem 2.4]. \(\square \)
Proposition 3
Let \(\{u_j\}_{j \in {\mathbb {N}}} \subset {\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma }({\mathbb {T}})\) be a sequence such that for any \(\epsilon >0\), there exists \(C_{\epsilon }>0\) such that
Then,
belongs to \({\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }'\) and
We use the notation \(\{u_{j}\} \rightsquigarrow u \in {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }\).
Proof
See [9, Lemma 2.7 and Theorem 2.9]. \(\square \)
2.2 Discretization of equation \(Lu=f\) and global hypoellipticity
In this subsection, we apply Fourier expansions in the equation \(Lu=f\) and recall the results on global hypoellipticity proved in [9]. To do this, consider the space
and let \(u \in {\mathscr {U}}_\mu \) be a solution of equation \(Lu = f\in {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }\). By using
we get that \(Lu=f\) if and only if
The last equations can be solved by elementary methods by
for some \(\xi _j \in {\mathbb {C}}.\) From the ellipticity of Eq. (10) we get \(u_j \in {\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma }({\mathbb {T}}),\) for all \(j \in {\mathbb {N}}\).
Now, let \({\mathcal {Z}}\) the set defined in (7). By the periodicity condition \(u_j(0) = u_j(2\pi )\) we have the following:
Lemma 4
If \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\) and \(Lu = f\in {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu }\), then
In particular,
is a solution of (10).
If \(j\notin {\mathcal {Z}}\) equations (10) have a unique solution, which can be written in the following equivalent two ways:
or
Using formulas (14) and (15) in [9] we proved necessary and sufficient conditions for global hypoellipticity. Recall that a differential operator \({\mathcal {Q}}\) on \({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}^n\) is said to be \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally hypoelliptic if conditions \(u \in {\mathscr {U}}_\mu \) and \({\mathcal {Q}}u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) imply \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \). Also in this case Diophantine conditions appear naturally to control the behavior of the sequences
Namely, inspired by Ref. [12], let us set the following condition for a complex number \(\omega \):
- (\({\mathscr {B}}\)):
-
for every \(\epsilon >0\) there exists \(C_{\epsilon }>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} | \tau - \omega \lambda _j| \geqslant C_{\epsilon } \exp \left( -\epsilon j^{\frac{1}{2n\mu }}\right) , \end{aligned}$$for all \((\tau , j) \in {\mathbb {Z}}\times {\mathbb {N}}\).
Notice that \(({\mathscr {B}})\) for \(\omega =a_0\) implies condition \(({\mathscr {A}})\) appearing in Theorem 1. The behavior of sequences in (16) and the condition \(({\mathscr {B}})\) can be connected in view of the following Lemma whose proof can be obtained by a slight modification of the arguments in the proof of Lemma 2.5 in [12]. We leave the details to the reader.
Lemma 5
Consider \(\eta \ge 1\) and \(\omega \in {\mathbb {C}}.\) The following two conditions are equivalent:
-
(i)
for each \(\epsilon >0\) there exists a positive constant \(C_\epsilon \) such that
$$\begin{aligned} |\tau - \omega \lambda _j|\geqslant C_\epsilon \exp \{-\epsilon (|\tau |+j)^{1/\eta }\}, \ \forall \tau \in {\mathbb {Z}},\, \forall j \in {\mathbb {N}}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
for each \(\delta >0\) there exists a positive constant \(C_\delta \) such that
$$\begin{aligned} |1-e^{2\pi i \omega \lambda _j}|\geqslant C_\delta \exp \{-\delta j^{1/\eta }\}, \ \forall j \in {\mathbb {N}}. \end{aligned}$$
We can now recall the global hypoellipticity results proved in [9] concerning the case when the coefficient c(t) is constant or depending on t respectively.
Theorem 6
Operator
is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally hypoelliptic if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
-
(a)
\(\beta \ne 0\);
-
(b)
\(\beta =0\) and \(\alpha \) satisfies condition (\({\mathscr {B}}\)), or equivalently, for every \(\epsilon >0\) there exists \(C_{\epsilon }>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \inf _{\tau \in {\mathbb {Z}}} | \tau - \alpha \lambda _j| \geqslant C_{\epsilon } \exp \left( -\epsilon j^{\frac{1}{2n\mu }}\right) , \ \text { as } \ j \rightarrow \infty . \end{aligned}$$
Proof
See [9, Theorem 3.6]. \(\square \)
Theorem 7
Operator \( L = D_t + c(t)P(x,D_x) \) is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally hypoelliptic if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
-
(a)
b is not identically zero and does not change sign;
-
(b)
\(b \equiv 0\) and \(a_0\) satisfies condition (\({\mathscr {B}}\)).
Proof
See [9, Theorem 3.11]. \(\square \)
3 Global solvability
In this section, we start the study of global solvability and make some preliminary steps to the proof of Theorem 1. First, we observe that in view of Lemma 4 it is necessary to introduce a class of admissible functions for the operator L, namely, the space \({\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\) of all \(f \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) such that
whenever \(j\in {\mathcal {Z}}.\) Therefore, we can refine the notion of solvability given in Definition 1 as follows.
Definition 2
We say that operator L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable if for every \(f\in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\) there exists \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) such that \(Lu=f\).
We observe that the solvability of operator L is strongly connected with properties of its transpose \(^tL\), cf. [13]. We recall that P is self-adjoint, with constant real coefficients, implying \(^tP= P\) in view of
Therefore,
and if \(f = Lu\) for some \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) and \(v \in \text{ ker }(^tL)\), we get
and
In particular, we may characterize \(\text{ ker }(^tL)\) in terms of Fourier coefficients as follows.
Lemma 8
We have \(\omega \in \text{ ker }(^tL)\) if and only if
for some \(\eta _j \in {\mathbb {C}}\). In particular, \({\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu } = [\text{ ker }\,(^tL)]^{\circ }\).
Proof
Note that \(\omega \in \text{ ker }(^tL)\) if and only if
where \(\eta _j \in {\mathbb {C}}\) satisfies the condition
since \(\omega _j(t)\) is \(2\pi \)-periodic. If \(j \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\), then \(\eta _j = 0\) and \(\omega _j(t) \equiv 0\). On the other hand, for \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\), \(\eta _j\) can be chosen arbitrarily.
Now, given \(\phi \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) and \(\omega = \sum _{j \in {\mathbb {N}}} \omega _j(t) \varphi _j(x) \in \text{ ker }(^tL)\) we obtain
By definition, if \(\phi \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\), then
which implies \(\langle \omega , \phi \rangle = 0\), then \(\phi \in [\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\).
Conversely, if \(\phi \in [\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\), then, fixed \(\ell \in {\mathcal {Z}}\), we can define a function \(\omega ^{\ell } \in \text{ ker }(^tL)\) by setting
Hence, from (18) we obtain
implying \(\phi \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }.\) \(\square \)
As for global hypoellipticity, in order to prove Theorem 1 we shall treat separately the case when the coefficient c in (1) is constant and the one when it depends on t. However, first we state the following general fact.
Proposition 9
If L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally hypoelliptic, then it is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable.
Proof
It follows from Theorem 7 that either \(b \equiv 0\) and \(a_0\) satisfies condition \(({\mathscr {B}})\) or b does not change sign, then \(b_0 \ne 0\). In both cases the set \({\mathcal {Z}}\) is finite, cf. [9, Theorem 3.14 and Corollary 3.9]. Moreover, by the equivalency of expressions (14) and (15) we can admit \(b(t)\ge 0\) without loss of generality.
Now, for any \(f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\) we may assume that \(\{f_j\}_{j \in {\mathbb {N}}} \subset {\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma }({\mathbb {T}})\). If \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\) we define \(u_j(t)\) by expression (13), while in case \(j \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\) we choose \(u_j(t)\) as in (14). Therefore, \(u_j(t) \in {\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma }({\mathbb {T}})\) for all j and
Since \({\mathcal {Z}}\) is finite, then estimates for \(u_j(t)\) in the case \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\) have no influence. On the other hand, for \(j \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\), by a similar argument as in the proof of [9, Theorem 3.6] (for \(b_0 = 0\)) and [9, Theorem 3.12] (for \(b(t)\not \equiv 0\)) we obtain that \(\{u_{j}\} \rightsquigarrow u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) and \(Lu=f\). \(\square \)
3.1 Time independent coefficients
In this subsection, we consider the time independent coefficients operator
Note that \((\alpha + i\beta )\lambda _{j} \in {\mathbb {Z}}\) if and only if \(\beta =0\) and \(\alpha \lambda _j \in {\mathbb {Z}}.\) In this case, \({\mathscr {E}}_{{\mathcal {L}},\mu }\) is given by all functions \(f \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) such that
The following standard formula will be useful in the sequel.
Lemma 10
Let s, p be positive numbers and \(\tau \in {\mathbb {N}}\). For every \(\eta >0\) there exist \(C_{\eta }>0\) such that
Theorem 11
Operator \({\mathcal {L}}\) is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable if and only if either \(\beta \ne 0\) or \(\beta =0\) and \(\alpha \) satisfies condition \(({\mathscr {A}})\).
Proof
If \(\beta \ne 0\), then the solvability is a consequence of Theorem 6 and Proposition 9. On the other hand, suppose that \(\beta = 0\) and assume condition (\({\mathscr {A}}\)).
Let \(f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{{\mathcal {L}},\mu }\) be fixed. If \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\), we set
and
if \(j \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\).
In the first case, it follows by Leibniz formula that
and, by \(|\lambda _j| \le C'j^{m/2n},\) we get
where
The last estimate, Lemma 10 and standard factorial inequalities guarantee that \(u_j \in {\mathcal {G}}^\sigma ({\mathbb {T}})\) and
for some positive constant C independent of \(\gamma .\) Similarly, in case \(j \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\), using Faà di Bruno formula, we obtain the same type of estimate for (19). Therefore, \(\{u_{j}\} \rightsquigarrow u \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) and \({\mathcal {L}} u = f\), which imply the solvability.
Conversely, assume that \(\alpha + i\beta \) does not satisfy condition (\({\mathscr {A}}\)). By Lemma 5 there are \(\epsilon _0>0\) and a sequence \((j_\ell , \tau _\ell ) \in {\mathbb {N}}\times {\mathbb {Z}}\) such that \(|j_\ell |+ |\tau _\ell |\) is increasing and
Since \(j_{\ell } \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\), for all \(\ell \), then
is such that \(\{f_{j}\} \rightsquigarrow f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{{\mathcal {L}},\mu }\). Therefore, if \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) satisfies \({\mathcal {L}}u=f\) we should have
implying
which contradicts (9). \(\square \)
3.2 Application: Cauchy problem
Our results can be applied also to the problem of the existence and uniqueness of periodic solutions to the Cauchy problem associated to the operator L in (1). We shall not give an exhaustive analysis of this problem but we shall limit to outline some examples.
Example 1
Consider the operator \({\mathcal {L}} = D_t + (\alpha + i \beta ) H\) and the Cauchy problem
defined on \({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}\), where H stands for the Harmonic oscillator
for which \(\lambda _j = 2j + 1\), \(j \in {\mathbb {N}}\).
If \(\beta \ne 0\), then \({\mathcal {L}}\) is globally solvable. In view of the Fourier expansions \(g(x) = \sum _{j \in {\mathbb {N}}} g_j \varphi _j(x)\), we get
In the homogeneous case \(f \equiv 0\), we have
with
Since \(\beta \ne 0\), then \(g_j = 0\) for all j and consequently \(u \equiv 0\) is the unique solution of (20), with \(g\equiv 0\). If \(g \ne 0\) then the Cauchy problem (20) has no solutions. Similar conclusion holds if \(\beta = 0\) and \(\alpha \notin {\mathbb {Q}}\).
Consider \(\beta = 0\), \(\alpha = 1/3\). In this case
whenever \(\tau - 1/3(2j+1) \ne 0\). Then, condition (\({\mathscr {A}}\)) is fulfilled and \({\mathcal {L}}\) is globally solvable. In particular,
where \(\kappa _j = (2j+1)/3 \in {\mathbb {N}}\), generate the unique solution of (20).
Now, let us consider the non-homogeneous case. Assuming \(\beta \ge 0\), if \({\mathcal {L}}\) is globally solvable, then we have
if \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\) and
whenever \(j \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\), then we must have
The latter condition can be viewed as a compatibility condition between f and the initial datum g.
We observe that if \(v=v(t,x)\) is a solution of the non-homogeneous problem with the initial datum \(h(x)=\sum _{j \in {\mathbb {N}}}h_j\varphi _j(x)\). Then,
and
Example 2
Let us now consider \(L = D_t + (\sin (t) + \cos (t)+1) H\) and the problem
defined on \({\mathbb {T}}\times {\mathbb {R}}\).
In this case, \(a_0 = 1\) and \({\mathcal {Z}} = {\mathbb {N}}\). Since
whenever \(\tau - \lambda _{j}a_0 \ne 0\) we see that L is globally solvable. Moreover,
3.3 Reduction to the normal form
In this subsection, we show that operator L is globally solvable if and only if the same occurs to its normal form, namely, the operator
This is a consequence of a conjugation formula presented in the next Proposition.
Proposition 12
There exists a linear isomorphism \(\Psi : {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \rightarrow {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) such that
Proof
For each \(u = \sum _{j \in {\mathbb {N}}} u_j(t) \varphi _j(x) \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) we define
and
where \(A(t) = \int _{0}^{t}a(s)ds - a_0t\).
If \(\Psi , \Psi ^{-1}: {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \rightarrow {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) are well defined, then it is easy to verify linearity and the equality (21). Therefore, it is enough to prove that \(\Psi u, \Psi ^{-1} u \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \). For this, let \(u \in {\mathcal {S}}_{\theta ,\mu }\) and set
Let \(\gamma \in {\mathbb {N}}\) be fixed. By Leibniz and Faà di Bruno formulas we get
since \(|\lambda _{j}| \le C_4 j^{m/2n}\) by (4), where \( \sum _{\Delta (k), \, \ell } = \sum _{k=1}^\ell \sum _{{\mathop {\ell _\nu \ge 1, \forall \nu }\limits ^{\ell _1+\ldots +\ell _k=\ell }}}. \)
Since \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \), there exist \(\epsilon _0 >0\) and \(C_5>0\) such that
Moreover, applying Lemma 10 with \(s=2n\mu \) and \(p=m/2n\), we have
Hence, by setting \({\widetilde{\sigma }}=\max \{\theta , \sigma \}\) we get
implying \(\Psi u \in {\mathcal {S}}_{\max \{{\widetilde{\sigma }}, m\mu -1\},\mu }\) and that it is well defined.
With similar arguments we may prove the same for \(\Psi ^{-1}\). \(\square \)
Proposition 13
Let \({\mathscr {E}}_{L_{a_0},\mu }\) be the space of admissible functions of operator \(L_{a_0}\), that is, the set of all \(f \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) such that
whenever \(j\in {\mathcal {Z}}\). Then:
-
(a)
\(\Psi : {\mathscr {E}}_{L_{a_0},\mu } \rightarrow {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\) is an isomorphism;
-
(b)
L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable if and only if the same is true for \(L_{a_0}\);
-
(c)
If \({\mathcal {Z}} = {\mathbb {N}}\), then L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)–globally solvable if and only if
$$\begin{aligned} L_b= D_t + ib(t)P(x,D_x) \end{aligned}$$it is also \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable.
Proof
Part (a) is trivial. To verify (b), assume that L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable and let \(f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L_{a_0},\mu }\). There exists \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) such that \(Lu = \Psi (f)\), then it follows from (22) that \(L_{a_0}[\Psi ^{-1}(u)] = f\) and the solvability of \(L_{a_0}\).
Viceversa, assume that \(L_{a_0}\) is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable. Given \(f\in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\) there is \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_\mu \) such that \(L_{a_0}u = \Psi ^{-1} (f)\) implying \(L[\Psi (u)] = f\) and the global solvability of L.
To verify (c) it is sufficient to observe that if \({\mathcal {Z}}= {\mathbb {N}}\), then functions
are \(2\pi \)-periodic for every \(j \in {\mathbb {N}}\) and we may use
to obtain a new conjugation formula instead of (21). \(\square \)
4 Proof of Theorem 1
In this section, we prove Theorem 1. We divide the proof in several steps.
4.1 Sufficient conditions
The first step is Theorem 14 where we show that each of the conditions (a) and (b) in Theorem 1 is sufficient for the global solvability of operator L.
In particular, we point out that in view of Proposition 13 it is equivalent to consider the operator
Notice that if b does not change sign and \(c_0\) satisfies (\({\mathscr {A}}\)), then either \(b \equiv 0\) on \({\mathbb {T}}\) and \(a_0\) satisfies (\({\mathscr {A}}\)) or b is not identically zero. Then, the sufficiency in item (a) of Theorem 1 is a direct consequence of the following result.
Theorem 14
Each of the following conditions is sufficient to guarantee the \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-global solvability of operator \(L_{a_0}\).
-
(a)
\(b\equiv 0\) and \(a_0\) satisfies \(({\mathscr {A}})\);
-
(b)
\(b\not \equiv 0\) and does not change sign;
-
(c)
b changes sign, \({\mathcal {Z}}^C\) is finite and \(\Omega _{r}\) is connected for all \(r \in {\mathbb {R}}\).
Proof
Under condition (a), \(L_{a_0} = D_t + a_0P\) and we may apply Theorem 11. Case (b) is a consequence of Theorem 7 and Proposition 9. To prove (c) we first assume \({\mathcal {Z}}={\mathbb {N}}\). In this case, \(b_0=0\) and that by Proposition 13 it is sufficient to consider
Let \(f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L_b,\mu } = [\text{ ker }(^t L_b)]^{\circ }\) be fixed. Since
we obtain that the functions
for any \(t_j \in {\mathbb {T}}\), belong to \({\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma }({\mathbb {T}})\) and solve
We assume that \(\lambda _{j}>0\) (the general case is analyzed in Remark 4). By defining
we obtain that the set
is connected. Therefore, if \(t_1 \in {\mathbb {T}}\) is given by
then \(t, t_1 \in \Theta _{t}\) and there is an arc \(\gamma _{t,t_1} \subset \Theta _{t}\) joining t and \(t_1\) implying
Then,
is a solution of (24). Moreover,
implying that the exponential term in (26) is bounded by one.
The estimates for \(u_j(t)\) are obtained by using Leibniz rule and Faà di Bruno formula. Then, we get \(\{u_{j}\} \rightsquigarrow u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\).
For the general case \({\mathcal {Z}}\ne {\mathbb {N}}\), consider the operator
and \(f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L_{a_0},\mu }\). If \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}^{C}\) we define \(u_j\) by expression (14). Since \({\mathcal {Z}}^{C}\) is finite, estimates are unnecessary. Now, for \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\) we replace (26) by
and proceed as before. \(\square \)
Remark 4
We point out that with a slight modification in the previous proof we can cover the general case where \(\lambda _{j}\) is not positive for all j. To see this, consider the sets
-
If \({\mathcal {W}}_{-}\) is finite: we use (13) as a solution of Eq. (24) when \(j \in {\mathcal {W}}_{-}\) and (26) for \(j \in {\mathcal {W}}_{+}\).
-
If \({\mathcal {W}}_{+}\) is finite: we take (13) as a solution of (24) if \(j \in {\mathcal {W}}_{+}\), while in case \(j \in {\mathcal {W}}_{-}\) we proceed as follows: let \(r_{t}\) be as in (25) and consider the connected set
$$\begin{aligned} {\widetilde{\Theta }}_{t} = \left\{ s \in {\mathbb {T}}; \ \int _{0}^{s} b(\tau )d\tau \le r_{t} \right\} . \end{aligned}$$Choosing \(t_1 \in {\mathbb {T}}\) as before we have \(t, t_1 \in {\widetilde{\Theta }}_{t}\) and consequently there is an arc \({\widetilde{\gamma }}_{t,t_1} \subset {\widetilde{\Theta }}_{t} \) joining t and \(t_1\). In particular,
$$\begin{aligned} 0 \le \int _{0}^{t} b(r)dr - \int _{0}^{s} b(r)dr, \ \forall s \in {\widetilde{\gamma }}_{t,t_1}. \end{aligned}$$Hence, for \(j \in {\mathcal {W}}_{-}\) we define
$$\begin{aligned} u_j(t) = i \int _{{\widetilde{\gamma }}_{t,t_1}}\exp \left[ \lambda _j\left( \int _{0}^{t} b(r) dr- \int _{0}^{s} b(r)dr\right) \right] f_j(s)ds \end{aligned}$$(27)Then
$$\begin{aligned} \lambda _j\left( \int _{0}^{t} b(r) dr- \int _{0}^{s} b(r)dr\right) \le 0, \ \forall s,t \in {\widetilde{\gamma }}_{t,t_1}, \end{aligned}$$implying that the exponential term in (27) is bounded by one.
-
If both sets \({\mathcal {W}}_{+}\) and \({\mathcal {W}}_{-}\) are infinite: we use (26) for \(j \in {\mathcal {W}}_{+}\) and (27) for \(j \in {\mathcal {W}}_{-}\).
4.2 Necessary conditions
In this section, we investigate the necessity of each condition in Theorem 1.
Given \(\sigma >1\) and an open interval \(I \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}\), let us denote by \({\mathcal {G}}^\sigma _c(I)\) the space of Gevrey functions of order \(\sigma \) with compact support contained in I.
Proposition 15
If b does not change sign and \(c_0\) does not satisfy \(({\mathscr {A}})\), then L is not \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable.
Proof
Assume \(b\ge 0\). There is \(\epsilon _0>0\) and an increasing sequence \(j_\ell \) such that
Let \(\phi \in {\mathcal {G}}_c^{\sigma }(\pi /2 - \delta , \pi /2+ \delta )\) be a cutoff function such that \(\phi \equiv 1\) in a neighborhood of \((\pi /2 - \delta /2, \pi /2+ \delta /2)\), where \(\delta >0\) is such that \((\pi /2 - \delta , \pi /2+ \delta ) \subset (0,\pi )\). Consider \(f_{j_\ell }(t)\) a \(2\pi \)-periodic extension of
and set
for which \(\{f_{j}\} \rightsquigarrow f \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\).
Note that either \(b_0 \ne 0,\) or \(b_0 = 0\) and \(a_0\lambda _{j_{\ell }} \notin {\mathbb {Z}}\), for all \(\ell \in {\mathbb {N}}\). In both cases, \(j_{\ell } \notin {\mathcal {Z}}\) for all \(\ell \in {\mathbb {N}}\) and \(f_{j} \equiv 0\) for \(j \in {\mathcal {Z}}\). It follows from Lemma 8 that \(f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\).
Now, we assume that \(\lambda _{j_{\ell }} >0\) for all \(\ell \) (See Remark 5 for the general case). If \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) is a solution of \(Lu = f\) we obtain
where
In particular, for \(t = \pi \),
Since \(\lambda _{j_{\ell }} \int _{\pi -s}^{\pi } b(r) dr\ge 0\),
which is a contradiction. \(\square \)
Remark 5
We can adapt the arguments in order to cover the case where \(\lambda _{j_{\ell }}\) are not positive for every \(\ell \). Indeed, consider
-
If \({\mathcal {W}}_{+}\) is infinite, we redefine the sequence \(f_j(t)\) as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} f_j(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} 0, \ j \ne {j_\ell }, \text { or } \ell \in {\mathcal {W}}_{-}, \\ f_{j_\ell }(t), j = {j_\ell }, \text { and } \ell \in {\mathcal {W}}_{+}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$ -
If \({\mathcal {W}}_{+}\) is finite, we then consider
$$\begin{aligned} f_j(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} 0, \ j \ne {j_\ell }, \text { or } \ell \in {\mathcal {W}}_{+}, \\ f_{j_\ell }(t), j = {j_\ell }, \text { and } \ell \in {\mathcal {W}}_{-} \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$and
$$\begin{aligned} u_{j_{\ell }}(t) = {\widetilde{\Gamma }}_{j_{\ell }} \int _{0}^{2\pi } \phi (t+s) \exp \left\{ -\lambda _{j_{\ell }} \int _{t}^{t+s} b(r) dr\right\} ds, \end{aligned}$$where
$$\begin{aligned} {\widetilde{\Gamma }}_{j_{\ell }} = i(e^{2\pi i (a_0 + ib_0)\lambda _{j_{\ell }}}-1)^{-1} \exp \left\{ -\epsilon _0 j_{\ell }^{1/2n\mu }\right\} \exp \left\{ i\lambda _{j_{\ell }} a_0\right\} . \end{aligned}$$Since \(-\lambda _{j_{\ell }} \int _{\pi -s}^{\pi } b(r) dr\ge 0\), we can proceed as before.
Next we analyze the case when b changes sign. In this case the necessity in item (b) of Theorem 1 can be proved in several steps.
Proposition 16
If b changes sign and \(b_0 \ne 0\), then L is not \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable.
Proof
Assume, without loss of generality, that \(\lambda _{j} > 0\) for all \(j \in {\mathbb {N}}\). We set
and
Since b changes sign we have \(M>0\). In particular, we may assume \(s^*\ne 0\), \(s^* \ne t^*\) and
where \(\gamma = t^* - s^*\).
Consider \(\delta >0\) such that \((\gamma - \delta , \gamma + \delta )\subset (0,t^*)\) and fix a cutoff function \(\phi \in {\mathcal {G}}_c^\sigma (\gamma - \delta , \gamma + \delta )\) satisfying \(0\le \phi \le 1\) and \(\phi \equiv 1\) on a neighborhood of interval \((\gamma - \delta /2, \gamma + \delta /2)\). Let \(f_j(t)\) be a \(2\pi \)-periodic extension of
Since \(M>0\), we get \(\{f_{j}\} \rightsquigarrow f \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\). We claim that \(f \in [\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\). Indeed, by \(b_0\ne 0\) we get \({\mathcal {Z}} = \emptyset \). Then, it follows from Lemma 8 that \(\omega \in \text{ ker }(^tL)\) if and only if \(\omega _j(t) \equiv 0\) for all \(j \in {\mathbb {N}}\).
Next, we show that there is not \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) such that \(Lu = f\). To verify this we proceed by a contradiction argument: if there were such u we would have
where \(\Theta _j = i\left( 1 - e^{- 2 \pi i\lambda _j c_0}\right) ^{-1}\). In particular,
Since \(b_0\ne 0\), there is a constant \(0<C\le |\Theta _j|\), for all j. Also, by the hypotheses on \(\phi \):
The function \(\psi (s) = M -{\mathcal {H}}(s,t^*)\) is positive with \(\psi (s^*)=0\). Then, \(s^*\) is a zero of even order and there exists \(k \in {\mathbb {N}}\) such that
By Taylor’s formula we obtain \(\eta \in (s^*-\delta /2, s^*+\delta /2)\) satisfying
for \(s \in (s^*-\delta /2,s^*+\delta /2)\), where
Denoting
we get
and
with \(C_3 = C_1/C_2\). Therefore, there is \(\beta >0\) such that
Note that
Note that
where \(\Gamma \) denotes the gamma function. Hence, there is \(j_0 \in {\mathbb {N}}\) such that
implying
Finally, given \(N>0\) we obtain from (4) some \(j_1\ge j_0\) such that
Hence,
which is in contradiction with (9). \(\square \)
Remark 6
We point out that the assumption \(\lambda _{j} > 0\) in the proof can be omitted. As in Remark 4 we split the analysis considering the sets
Let us show how to proceed when \({\mathcal {W}}_{-}\) is infinite. For \(j\in {\mathcal {W}}_{-}\) we use
and take \(f_j(t)\) as the \(2\pi \)-periodic extension of
where \(M=\max _{s,t \in [0,2\pi ]}{\mathcal {G}}(s,t)\).
Now we define the sequence \(u_j(t)\) using expression (15). Following the same procedure we get
where \(\widetilde{\Theta _j}=\left( e^{2 \pi i\lambda _j c_0} -1\right) ^{-1}\) and
implying
Proposition 17
If b changes sign, \(b_0 = 0\) and \({\mathcal {Z}}^C\) is an infinite set, then L is not \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable.
Proof
Let \(\lambda _{j_\ell }\) be a subsequence such that \(j_\ell > \ell \) and \(\lambda _{j_{\ell }}a_0 \notin {\mathbb {Z}}\). Consider \({\mathcal {H}}(s,t)\) and M be as in the proof of Proposition 16. Also, we use \(t^*, s^*, \gamma \) and \(\phi (t)\) as before and set by \(f_{j_\ell }(t)\) a \(2\pi \)-periodic extension of
Therefore, defining \(f_{j}(t) \equiv 0\), if \(j \ne j_\ell \), we get \(\{f_{j}(t)\} \rightsquigarrow f \in [\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\).
If \(Lu=f\), then
where \(\Theta _j = i\left( 1 - e^{- 2 \pi i\lambda _j a_0}\right) ^{-1}\), and
implying
Finally, we can proceed as in the proof of Proposition 16. \(\square \)
Combining Propositions 16 and 17 we obtain that if L is \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable, then \(b_0=0\) and \({\mathcal {Z}}^C\) is finite. To conclude the proof of the necessity in Theorem 1 it is now sufficient to prove the next result.
Theorem 18
Assume that b changes sign and \({\mathcal {Z}}\) is infinite. If \(\Omega _{r}\) is not connected for some \(r \in {\mathbb {R}}\), then L is not \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable for every \(\mu \ge \frac{1}{2}\).
The proof of this theorem relies on the violation of the so-called Hörmander condition, cf. [28, Lemma 6.1.2], which provides a necessary condition for solvability. We point out that this kind of approach is well known in the literature, as the reader may see in [1, 2, 11,12,13, 15, 29, 35]. Here we adapt the result in [28] to our functional setting as follows.
Theorem 19
(Hörmander condition) Let L be \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable. Then, given \(\sigma >1\), we obtain that for every \(A>0\) and \(B>0\) there exist a constant \(C>0\) such that
for all \(f \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }=[\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\) and \(v \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) such that \(^tLv \in {\mathcal {S}}_{\sigma ,\mu ,B}\), where we recall that
Proof
Consider the spaces
and
Note that \([\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\) is a closed subspace of \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\) and it can be endowed with the induced topology, while on \({\mathscr {O}}\) we consider the topology generated by the seminorms
Now, let \(B: [\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ } \times {\mathscr {O}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}\) be the bilinear form
We observe that \(B(\cdot , [\phi ])\) is continuous on \([\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\), for every \([\phi ] \in {\mathscr {O}}\). Let \(f \in [\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\) be fixed and consider \(u \in {\mathscr {F}}_{\mu }\) such that \(Lu=f\). Hence, there exists \(C=C(u)>0\)
Therefore, we have: \([\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ }\) is a Fréchet space; \({\mathscr {O}}\) is a metrizable topological vector space; B is separately continuous on \([\text{ ker }(^tL)]^{\circ } \times {\mathscr {O}}\). Under these conditions, it follows from the Corollary of Theorem 34.1 in [39] that the bilinear form B is continuous. Then, (28) holds true. \(\square \)
As in [12] (see also [30, Lemma 2.2]), we make use of the following result.
Lemma 20
Suppose that there exists \(r \in {\mathbb {R}}\) such that
is not connected. Then, we can find a real number \(r_0 <r\) such that \({\widetilde{\Omega }}_{r_0}\) has two connected components with disjoint closures. Moreover, we can construct functions \(f_0,v_0 \in {\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma }\), \(\sigma >1\), satisfying the following conditions:
and
Proof of Theorem 18
Assume for a moment that \({\mathcal {Z}} ={\mathbb {N}}\), and consider \(L = D_t + ib(t)P\). Let \(r \in {\mathbb {R}}\) such that
is not connected. By the previous Lemma, there is \(r_0<-r\) such that
has two connected components with disjoint closures, and we can fix \(\epsilon >0\) such that
Define the sequences
and
where \(f_0, v_0\) are given in the Lemma. In particular,
and
For each \(\ell \in {\mathbb {N}}\), the x-Fourier coefficients of \(f_\ell (t,x)\) are given by
Then,
implying \(f_{\ell }(t,x) \in {\mathscr {E}}_{L,\mu }\), \(\forall \ell \in {\mathbb {N}}\).
We claim that sequences \(f_{\ell }\) and \(v_{\ell }\) violate condition (28). Indeed, let \(\alpha , \beta \in {\mathbb {N}}^n\) and \(\gamma \in {\mathbb {N}}\). By defining
we get, for every \(M, \gamma \in {\mathbb {N}}\):
Set \(\Psi _{\ell ,\gamma }(t) = \partial _t^{\gamma }[{\mathcal {H}}_{\ell }(t) f_0(t)]\). Since \(f_0\in {\mathcal {G}}^{\sigma , h}\) it follows that
and by Faà di Bruno formula
where \( \sum _{\Delta (\tau ), \, \beta } = \sum _{\tau =1}^\beta \sum _{{\mathop {\beta _\nu \ge 1, \forall \nu }\limits ^{\beta _1+\ldots +\beta _\tau =\beta }}}. \) In view of
we obtain
where \(|\lambda _\ell | \le \rho \ell ^{\, m/2n}\).
We take \(s=2n/m\) in Lemma 10. Then, for any \(\eta >0\) there is \(C_{\eta }>0\) such that
implying
for \(\ell \) large enough.
Now, applying again Lemma 10 we obtain that for every \(\eta >0\) there exists \(C_\eta >0\) such that
Hence, we can estimate the norm (8) of \(f_\ell \) as follows:
By a similar procedure:
Now we recall that
for some positive constants \(\rho , \rho *\). If \(\lambda _{\ell }>0\), then
and
where
and
Therefore,
Then, since \(\mu \ge \frac{1}{2} \ge \frac{1}{m},\) choosing \(\eta \) such that \(\rho ^*(c_1 + c_2) + 4\eta <0\) and obtain that
On the other hand, if \(\lambda _{\ell }<0\), then the right-hand side in (30) becomes
and again we obtain the same contradiction.
It follows from (29) that condition (28) can not be fulfilled implying that L is not \({\mathcal {S}}_{\mu }\)-globally solvable, for \(\mu \ge \frac{1}{2}\).
Finally, in the general case \({\mathcal {Z}} \ne {\mathbb {N}}\) the proof is given by a slight modification in the previous arguments. Indeed, we may consider the operator \(L = D_t + (a_0+ib(t))P\), and sequences
instead of \(f_\ell \) and \(v_\ell \). \(\square \)
Data availability
No data were used for the research described in the article.
References
Albanese, A., Popivanov, P.: On the global solvability in Gevrey classes on the n-dimensional torus. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 297, 659–672 (2004)
Albanese, A., Zanghirati, L.: Global hypoellipticity and global solvability in Gevrey classes on the n-dimensional torus. J. Differ. Equ. 199(2), 256–268 (2004)
Araújo, G.: Global regularity and solvability of left-invariant differential systems on compact lie groups. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 56(4), 631–665 (2019)
Araújo, G., Ferra, I.A., Ragognette, L.F.: Global analytic hypoellipticity and solvability of certain operators subject to group actions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 150(11), 4771–4783 (2022)
Arias Junior, A.: Some remarks on the Cauchy Problem for Schrödinger type equations in Gelfand–Shilov space, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08194 (2023)
Arias Junior, A., Ascanelli, A., Cappiello, M.: The Cauchy problem for \(3\)-evolution equations with data in Gelfand–Shilov spaces. J. Evol. Equ. 22(2), 33–40 (2022)
Ascanelli, A., Cappiello, M.: Hölder continuity in time for SG hyperbolic systems. J. Differ. Equ. 244, 2091–2121 (2008)
Ascanelli, A., Cappiello, M.: Schrödinger-type equations in Gelfand–Shilov spaces. J. Math. Pures Appl. 132, 207–250 (2019)
de Ávila Silva, F., Cappiello, M.: Time-periodic Gelfand–Shilov spaces and global hypoellipticity on \({\mathbb{T} }\times {\mathbb{R} }^n\). J. Funct. Anal. 9, 109418 (2022)
de Ávila Silva, F., Gramchev, T.V., Kirilov, A.: Global hypoellipticity for first-order operators on closed smooth manifolds. J. Anal. Math. 135, 527–573 (2018)
Bergamasco, A.P., Dattori da Silva, P.L., Gonzalez, R.B., Kirilov, A.: Global solvability and global hypoellipticity for a class of complex vector fields on the 3-torus. J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl. 6(3), 341–360 (2015)
Bergamasco, A.P., Dattori da Silva, P.L., Gonzalez, R.B.: Global solvability and global hypoellipticity in Gevrey classes for vector fields on the torus. J. Differ. Equ. 264(5), 3500–3526 (2018)
Bergamasco, A.P., Dattori da Silva, P.L., Gonzalez, R.B.: Existence and regularity of periodic solutions to certain first-order partial differential equations. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 23(1), 65–90 (2017)
Bergamasco, A.P., de Medeira, C., Zani, S.: Global Gevrey solvability for a class of involutive systems on the torus Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 37, 1459–1488 (2021)
Bergamasco, A.P., Cavalcanti, M.M., Gonzalez, R.B.: Existence and regularity of periodic solutions for a class of partial differential operators. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 27(52) (2021)
Cappiello, M.: Fourier integral operators of infinite order and applications to SG-hyperbolic equations. Tsukuba J. Math. 28(2), 311–362 (2004)
Cappiello, M., Gramchev, T., Pilipović, S., Rodino, L.: Anisotropic Shubin operators and eigenfunction expansions in Gelfand–Shilov spaces. J. Anal. Math. 138(2), 857–870 (2019)
Cappiello, M., Gramchev, T., Rodino, L.: Super-exponential decay and holomorphic extensions for semilinear equations with polynomial coefficients. J. Funct. Anal. 237, 634–654 (2006)
Cappiello, M., Gramchev, T., Rodino, L.: Entire extensions and exponential decay for semilinear elliptic equations. J. Anal. Math. 111, 339–367 (2010)
Cappiello, M., Gramchev, T., Rodino, L.: Sub-exponential decay and uniform holomorphic extensions for semilinear pseudodifferential equations. Commun. Partial Differ. 35(5), 846–877 (2010)
Cappiello, M., Pilipović, S., Prangoski, B.: Semilinear pseudodifferential equations in spaces of tempered ultradistributions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 44(1), 317–338 (2016)
Cordero, E., Nicola, F., Rodino, L.: Exponentially sparse representations of Fourier integral operators. Rev. Math. Iberoam. 31, 461–476 (2015)
Cordero, E., Nicola, F., Rodino, L.: Gabor representations of evolution operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 367, 7639–7663 (2015)
Gelfand, I.M., Shilov, G.E.: Generalized Functions, vol. 2. Academic Press, New York (1967)
Gelfand, I.M., Shilov, G.E.: Generalized Functions, vol. 3. Academic Press, New York (1967)
Gramchev, T., Pilipovic, S., Rodino, L.: Eigenfunction expansions in \(\mathbb{R} ^{n}\). Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139(12), 4361–4368 (2011)
Greenfield, S.J., Wallach, N.R.: Global hypoellipticity and Liouville numbers. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 31(1), 112–114 (1972)
Hörmander, L.: Linear Partial Differential Operators. Springer, Berlin (1963)
Hounie, J.: Globally hypoelliptic and globally solvable first-order evolution equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 252, 233–248 (1979)
Hounie, J., Cardoso, F.: Global solvability of an abstract complex. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 65, 117–124 (1977)
Kirilov, A., Moraes, W.A.A., Ruzhansky, M.: Global hypoellipticity and global solvability for vector fields on compact Lie groups. J. Funct. Anal. 280(2), 108806 (2021)
Kirilov, A., Moraes, W.A.A., Ruzhansky, M.: Global properties of vector fields on compact lie groups in Komatsu classes. Z. Anal. Anwend. 40(4), 425–451 (2021)
Nicola, F., Rodino, L.: Global Pseudo-differential Calculus on Euclidean Spaces. Birkhäuser, Basel (2010)
Pedroso Kowacs, A.: Schwartz regularity of differential operators on the cylinder. Preprint arXiv:2307.12819 (2023)
Petronilho, G.: Global \(s\)-solvability, global \(s\)-hypoellipticity and Diophantine phenomena. Indag. Math. (N.S.) 16, 67–90 (2005)
Pilipović, S.: Tempered ultradistributions. Boll. U.M.I. 7(2-B), 235–251 (1988)
Prangoski, B.: Pseudodifferential operators of infinite order in spaces of tempered ultradistributions. J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl. 4, 495–549 (2013)
Shubin, M.: Pseudodifferential operators and the spectral theory, Springer Series in Soviet Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (1987)
Treves, F.: Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels, 1st edn. Academic Press, New York (1967)
Treves, F.: Study of a model in the theory of complexes of pseudodifferential operators. Ann. Math. 104(2), 269–324 (1976)
Acknowledgements
The research of Fernando de Ávila Silva was supported in part by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq—(grants 423458/2021-3, 402159/2022-5, 200295/2023-3, and 305630/2022-9). Part of this work was developed while he was a visitor to the Department of Mathematics at the University of Turin. He is very grateful for all the support and hospitality.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Torino within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all the authors the corresponding author declares that there is no conflict of interest. Moreover, the present manuscript has no associated data.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
de Ávila Silva, F., Cappiello, M. Globally solvable time-periodic evolution equations in Gelfand–Shilov classes. Math. Ann. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-024-02925-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-024-02925-6