Skip to main content
Log in

Blow-up of dynamically restricted critical norms near a potential Navier–Stokes singularity

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we develop new methods to obtain regularity criteria for the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations in terms of dynamically restricted endpoint critical norms: the critical Lebesgue norm in general or the critical weak Lebesgue norm in the axisymmetric case. This type of results is inspired in particular by a work of Neustupa (Arch Ration Mech Anal 214(2):525–544, 2014), which handles certain non endpoint critical norms. Our work enables to have a better understanding of the nonlocal effect of the pressure on the regularity of the solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availibility

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Notes

  1. By definition, the point (0, 0) is a singular point if for all \(r\in (0,1)\), \(v\notin L^\infty (Q_{(0,0)}(r))\), where \(Q_{(0,0)}(r)\) is the parabolic cylinder \(B_0(r)\times (-r^2,0)\). The point (0, 0) is called a regular point if it is not a singular point.

  2. In particular, \(v\in C^\infty (-1,T;C^\infty (\mathbb {R}^3))\) for all \(T\in (-1,0)\). We introduce this assumption in order to remove certain technicalities. Notice that the framework of first-time singularities is relevant for the study of the global regularity problem for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations.

  3. From our estimates, we can allow \(a\in \big (0,\frac{4}{3}\lambda _S(B_0(1))\big )\). We choose \(a:=\lambda _S(B_0(1))\) in order to fix the ideas.

  4. Later on, N will be taken large depending in particular on M, see (3.15).

  5. The restriction \(\gamma >0\) is needed for the validity of (2.4) for all \(t\in (s,0]\). We will subsequently show, see (4.2), that the second term in the left hand side of (2.4) also makes sense for \(\gamma >-1\). This fact will be used in Sect. 4.

  6. For \(t=0\), we integrate over \(\mathbb {R}^3\times (s,\delta )\) and let \(\delta \rightarrow 0^-\).

  7. Notice that this decomposition of \(\eta \) is only needed for \(t\in (-\frac{1}{4},0)\).

  8. Notice that f and \(g_\gamma \) are dimensionally critical in the sense of Caffarelli, Kohn and Nirenberg [9].

  9. Such an operator is sometimes called a Bogovskii operator, see [15].

  10. It is well known that \(\lambda _S(B_0 (1))\) is greater than \(\pi ^2\), the principal eigenvalue of the Dirichlet-Laplace operator.

  11. Here we see that any \(0< a < \frac{4}{3}\lambda _S(B_0 (1) )\) works; see Footnote 3. We remark here that there is a possibility to get the full range \(0< a <4\lambda _S(B_0 (1) )\) as in [24]. Indeed, it suffices to choose different parameters in Young’s inequality leading to (2.15) and (2.16). This results in a small parameter \(\varepsilon \) in front of the third term in the right hand side of (2.15) and of the second term in the right hand side of (2.16). We do not carry out this technical modification here so as to keep the number of parameters to a minimum.

References

  1. Albritton, D., Barker, T.: Localised necessary conditions for singularity formation in the Navier–Stokes equations with curved boundary. J. Differ. Equ. 269(9), 7529–7573 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barker, T.: Localized quantitative estimates and potential blow-up rates for the Navier–Stokes equations. arXiv e-prints: arXiv:2209.15627 (2022)

  3. Barker, T., Prange, C.: Localized smoothing for the Navier–Stokes equations and concentration of critical norms near singularities. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 236(3), 1487–1541 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker, T., Prange, C.: Quantitative regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations via spatial concentration. Commun. Math. Phys. 385(2), 717–792 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Barker, T., Prange, C.: From concentration to quantitative regularity: a short survey of recent developments for the Navier–Stokes equations. arXiv e-prints: arXiv:2211.16215 (2022)

  6. Bergh, J., Löfström, J.: Interpolation spaces. An introduction. In: Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 223. Springer, Berlin (1976)

  7. Bradshaw, Z., Grujić, Z.: Frequency localized regularity criteria for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 224(1), 125–133 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradshaw, Z., Tsai, T.-P.: On the local pressure expansion for the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 24(1), 1–32 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Caffarelli, L., Kohn, R., Nirenberg, L.: Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 35(6), 771–831 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, C.-C., Strain, R.M., Tsai, T.-P., Yau, H.-T.: Lower bounds on the blow-up rate of the axisymmetric Navier–Stokes equations II. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 34(3), 203–232 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, C.-C., Strain, R.M., Yau, H.-T., Tsai, T.-P.: Lower bound on the blow-up rate of the axisymmetric Navier–Stokes equations. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2008 (2008)

  12. Cheskidov, A., Dai, M.: Kolmogorov’s dissipation number and the number of degrees of freedom for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A Math. 149(2), 429–446 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheskidov, A., Shvydkoy, R.: A unified approach to regularity problems for the 3D Navier–Stokes and Euler equations: the use of Kolmogorov’s dissipation range. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 16(2), 263–273 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Escauriaza, L., Seregin, G.A., Šverák, V.: \(L_{3,\infty }\)-solutions of Navier-Stokes equations and backward uniqueness. Usp. Mat. Nauk 58(2(350)), 3–44 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galdi, G.P.: An introduction to the mathematical theory of the Navier–Stokes equations. In: Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2011) (steady-state problems)

  16. Grujić, Z., Xu, L.: A regularity criterion for 3D NSE in dynamically restricted local Morrey spaces. Appl. Anal. 31, 1–15 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hunt, R.A.: On \(L(p, q)\) spaces. Enseignement Math. 2(12), 249–276 (1966)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang, K., Miura, H., Tsai, T.-P.: Regular sets and an \(\epsilon \)-regularity theorem in terms of initial data for the Navier–Stokes equations. Pure Appl. Anal. 3(3), 567–594 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Koch, G., Nadirashvili, N., Seregin, G., Šverák, V.: Liouville theorems for the Navier–Stokes equations and applications. Acta Math. 203(1), 83–105 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lei, Z., Zhang, Q.S.: A Liouville theorem for the axially-symmetric Navier–Stokes equations. J. Funct. Anal. 261(8), 2323–2345 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, K., Ozawa, T., Wang, B.: Dynamical behavior for the solutions of the Navier–Stokes equation. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 17(4), 1511–1560 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo, X.: A Beale–Kato–Majda criterion with optimal frequency and temporal localization. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 21(1), 16 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Neustupa, J.: A removable singularity in a suitable weak solution to the Navier–Stokes equations. Nonlinearity 25(6), 1695–1708 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Neustupa, J.: A refinement of the local Serrin-type regularity criterion for a suitable weak solution to the Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 214(2), 525–544 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nečas, J., Neustupa, J.: New conditions for local regularity of a suitable weak solution to the Navier–Stokes equation. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 4(3), 237–256 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Neil, R.: Convolution operators and \({L}(p, q)\) spaces. Duke Math. J. 30(1), 129–142 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Ożański, W.S., Palasek, S.: Quantitative control of solutions to axisymmetric Navier–Stokes equations in terms of the weak \({L}^3\) norm. arXiv e-prints: arXiv:2210.10030 (2022)

  28. Seregin, G.: Local regularity of axisymmetric solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations. Anal. Math. Phys. 10(4), 46 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Seregin, G., Šverák, V.: On type I singularities of the local axi-symmetric solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 34(2), 171–201 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Seregin, G., Šverák, V.: Regularity criteria for Navier–Stokes solutions. In: Giga, Y., Novotný, A. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Analysis in Mechanics of Viscous Fluids, pp. 829–867. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Seregin, G.A., Zajaczkowski, W.: A sufficient condition of local regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI), 336 (Kraev. Zadachi Mat. Fiz. Smezh. Vopr. Teor. Funkts. 37) 46–54, 274 (2006)

  32. Tao, T.: Quantitative bounds for critically bounded solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations. In: Kechris, A., Makarov, N., Ramakrishnan, D., Zhu, X. (eds.) Nine Mathematical Challenges: An Elucidation, vol. 104. American Mathematical Society, New York (2021)

Download references

Acknowledgements

CP and PFD are partially supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, project BORDS, grant ANR-16-CE40-0027-01. CP is also partially supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, project SINGFLOWS, grant ANR- 18-CE40-0027-01, project CRISIS, grant ANR-20-CE40-0020-01, by the CY Initiative of Excellence, project CYNA (CY Nonlinear Analysis) and project CYFI (CYngular Fluids and Interfaces). PFD is also supported by the Labex MME-DII. TB and CP thank the Institute of Advanced Studies of Cergy Paris University for their hospitality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Prange.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Known results about Lorentz spaces

Appendix A. Known results about Lorentz spaces

Given a measurable subset \(\Omega \subseteq \mathbb {R}^{d}\), let us define the Lorentz spaces. For a measurable function \(f:\Omega \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) define:

$$\begin{aligned} d_{f,\Omega }(\alpha ):=\mu (\{x\in \Omega : |f(x)|>\alpha \}), \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

where \(\mu \) denotes the Lebesgue measure. The Lorentz space \(L^{p,q}(\Omega )\), with \(p\in [1,\infty )\), \(q\in [1,\infty ]\), is the set of all measurable functions g on \(\Omega \) such that the quasinorm \(\Vert g\Vert _{L^{p,q}(\Omega )}\) is finite. Here:

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \Vert g\Vert _{L^{p,q}(\Omega )}:= \Bigg (p\int \limits _{0}^{\infty }\alpha ^{q}d_{g,\Omega }(\alpha )^{\frac{q}{p}}\frac{d\alpha }{\alpha }\Bigg )^{\frac{1}{q}}, \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)
$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \Vert g\Vert _{L^{p,\infty }(\Omega )}:= \sup _{\alpha >0}\alpha d_{g,\Omega }(\alpha )^{\frac{1}{p}}. \end{aligned}$$
(A.3)

It is known there exists a norm, which is equivalent to the quasinorm defined above, for which \(L^{p,q}(\Omega )\) is a Banach space. For \(p\in [1,\infty )\) and \(1\le q_{1}< q_{2}\le \infty \), we have the following continuous embeddings

$$\begin{aligned} L^{p,q_1}(\Omega ) \hookrightarrow L^{p,q_2}(\Omega ) \end{aligned}$$
(A.4)

and the inclusion is known to be strict.

Our main tool in this paper is the following Hölder’s inequality for Lorentz spaces. The statement below and proof can be found in Hunt’s paper [17, Theorem 4.5, p. 271]; see also [26, Theorems 3.4\(-\)3.5, page 141].

Proposition A.1

Suppose that \(1\le p,q,r\le \infty \) and \(1\le s_1,s_2\le \infty \). Furthermore, suppose that p, q, r, \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) satisfy the following relations:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{r} \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{s_1}+\frac{1}{s_2}=\frac{1}{s}. \end{aligned}$$

Then the assumption that \(f\in L^{p,s_1}(\Omega )\) and \(g\in L^{q,s_2}(\Omega )\) imply that \(fg \in L^{r,s}(\Omega )\), with the estimate

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert fg\Vert _{L^{r,s}(\Omega )}\le C(p,q,s_1,s_2)\Vert f\Vert _{L^{p,s_1}(\Omega )}\Vert g\Vert _{L^{q,s_2}(\Omega )}. \end{aligned}$$
(A.5)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barker, T., Fernández-Dalgo, P.G. & Prange, C. Blow-up of dynamically restricted critical norms near a potential Navier–Stokes singularity. Math. Ann. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02675-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02675-x

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation