Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship of anesthetic activity of alkyl acetates to hydrophobicity and in vivo effect on membrane fluidity in mice

  • MOLECULAR TOXICOLOGY
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vivo anesthetic activity of alkyl acetates in mice was studied in relation to hydrophobicity and the in vivo effect on membrane fluidity. The anesthetic potency (AD50) of alkyl acetates was determined; AD50 shows the i.p. dose required to anesthetize 50% of mice from the treated group. We used log P (n-octanol/water partition coefficient) as an operational definition of hydrophobicity. Membrane fluidity was determined using 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH) as fluorescence probe. Log (1/AD50) was a parabolic function of log P, and the value of log P that corresponds to the minimum AD50 was estimated to be 2.08. Brain synaptosomal membranes were prepared from mice 30 min after dosing with each of the three alkyl acetates applied at 1.5-fold AD50: n-butyl, n-amyl, and n-hexyl acetate. In each alkyl acetate group, most of the animals were anesthetized (>68%). Decreased membrane fluidity was observed for the animals that were anesthetized while no change in the fluidity was seen for the animals that were not anesthetized. The results suggest an involvement of decreased DPH fluidity in alkyl acetate-induced anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 24 March 1997 / Accepted: 27 May 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanii, H., Zhang, XP., Oka, R. et al. Relationship of anesthetic activity of alkyl acetates to hydrophobicity and in vivo effect on membrane fluidity in mice. Arch Toxicol 71, 622–626 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002040050435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002040050435

Navigation