Abstract
In contrast to somatic mutations, mutations in germ cells affect every cell of any organism derived from the germ cell and therefore are related to numerous genetic diseases. However, there is no suitable assay to evaluate the mutagenic sensitivities of both male and female germ cells. The main type of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is hermaphroditic, where spermatogenesis and oogenesis occur chronologically at specific stages, allowing induction of mutations in either sperm or eggs exclusively. In this study, we used the alkylating agent ethyl methanesulfonate and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea to induce germline mutations in C. elegans at different developmental stages and analyzed mutation frequency and mutational spectrum from data gathered using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Our results revealed low spontaneous mutation rates of C. elegans, along with distinct mutagenic effects elicited by the two mutagens. Our data show that the parental worms treated during germ cell mitosis, spermatogenesis, and oogenesis resulted in different mutation frequencies in their offspring, and female germ cells could be very susceptible to mutagen exposure during oogenesis. In summary, our study indicates that the use of C. elegans and its specific chronological hermaphroditism would be a promising way to explore the sensitivities of both male and female germ cells to mutagens.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data will be available upon the publication of this article.
References
Anderson KV, Ingham PW (2003) The transformation of the model organism: a decade of developmental genetics. Nat Genet 33:285–293. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1105
Baird WM, Hooven LA, Mahadevan B (2005) Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and mechanism of action. Environ Mol Mutagen 45(2–3):106–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.20095
Bateman AJ (1973) The dominant lethal assay in the mouse. Agents Actions 3(2):73–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01986537
Beranek DT (1990) Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents. Mutat Res 231(1):11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(90)90173-2
Bertin G, Averbeck D (2006) Cadmium: cellular effects, modifications of biomolecules, modulation of DNA repair and genotoxic consequences (a review). Biochimie 88(11):1549–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.001
Branzei D, Foiani M (2005) The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17(6):568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.09.003
Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1):71–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/77.1.71
Bronstein SM, Skopek TR, Swenberg JA (1992) Efficient repair of O6-ethylguanine, but not O4-ethylthymine or O2-ethylthymine, is dependent upon O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and nucleotide excision repair activities in human cells. Cancer Res 52(7):2008–2011
Cariello NF, Piegorsch WW, Adams WT, Skopek TR (1994) Computer program for the analysis of mutational spectra: application to p53 mutations. Carcinogenesis 15(10):2281–2285. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/15.10.2281
Chasnov JR, Chow KL (2002) Why are there males in the hermaphroditic species Caenorhabditis elegans? Genetics 160(3):983–994. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/160.3.983
Crow JF (1997) The high spontaneous mutation rate: Is it a health risk? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(16):8380–8386. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.16.8380
De Stasio EA, Dorman S (2001) Optimization of ENU mutagenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mutat Res 495(1–2):81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00198-x
Denver DR, Feinberg S, Steding C, Durbin M, Lynch M (2006) The relative roles of three DNA repair pathways in preventing Caenorhabditis elegans mutation accumulation. Genetics 174(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.059840
Du H, Wang M, Dai H et al (2015) Endosulfan isomers and sulfate metabolite induced reproductive toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans involves genotoxic response genes. Environ Sci Technol 49(4):2460–2468. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504837z
Du H, Pan B, Chen T (2017) Evaluation of chemical mutagenicity using next generation sequencing: a review. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 35(3):140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2017.1328831
Du H, Wang P, Li L, Wang Y (2019) Repair and translesion synthesis of O6-alkylguanine DNA lesions in human cells. J Biol Chem 294(29):11144–11153. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.009054
Feig DI, Reid TM, Loeb LA (1994) Reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 54(7):S1890–S1894
Flibotte S, Edgley ML, Chaudhry I et al (2010) Whole-genome profiling of mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 185(2):431–441. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.116616
Goldmann JM, Veltman JA, Gilissen C (2019) De novo mutations reflect development and aging of the human germline. Trends Genet 35(11):828–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2019.08.005
Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R et al (2007) Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature 446(7132):153–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05610
Habas K, Anderson D, Brinkworth M (2016) Detection of phase specificity of in vivo germ cell mutagens in an in vitro germ cell system. Toxicology 353–354:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2016.04.001
Hansen SH, Olsen AK, Soderlund EJ, Brunborg G (2010) In vitro investigations of glycidamide-induced DNA lesions in mouse male germ cells and in mouse and human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 696(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.12.012
Hubbard EJ (2007) Caenorhabditis elegans germ line: a model for stem cell biology. Dev Dyn 236(12):3343–3357. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21335
Jonsson H, Sulem P, Kehr B et al (2017) Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature 549(7673):519–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24018
Kaletta T, Hengartner MO (2006) Finding function in novel targets: C. elegans as a model organism. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5(5):387–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2031
Kimble J, Crittenden SL (2005) Germline proliferation and its control. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.13.1
Kimmel CA, Makris SL (2001) Recent developments in regulatory requirements for developmental toxicology. Toxicol Lett 120(1–3):73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00309-5
Kingsmore SF (2016) Newborn testing and screening by whole-genome sequencing. Genet Med 18(3):214–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.172
Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G et al (2012) Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature 488(7412):471–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11396
Lang R, Adler ID (1982) Studies on the mutagenic potential of the pesticide chlordimeforme and its principal metabolites in the mouse heritable translocation assay. Mutat Res 92(1–2):243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(82)90227-5
Leung MCK, Williams PL, Benedetto A et al (2008) Caenorhabditis elegans: an emerging model in biomedical and environmental toxicology. Toxicol Sci 106(1):5–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn121
Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A et al (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Livneh Z, Cohen-Fix O, Skaliter R, Elizur T (1993) Replication of damaged DNA and the molecular mechanism of ultraviolet light mutagenesis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 28(6):465–513. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409239309085136
Masumura K, Toyoda-Hokaiwado N, Ukai A, Gondo Y, Honma M, Nohmi T (2016a) Dose-dependent de novo germline mutations detected by whole-exome sequencing in progeny of ENU-treated male gpt delta mice. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 810:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.09.009
Masumura K, Toyoda-Hokaiwado N, Ukai A, Gondo Y, Honma M, Nohmi T (2016b) Estimation of the frequency of inherited germline mutations by whole exome sequencing in ethyl nitrosourea-treated and untreated gpt delta mice. Genes Environ 38:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-016-0035-y
Masumura K, Ando T, Toyoda-Hokaiwado N, Ukai A, Nohmi T, Honma M (2021) Comparison of the frequencies of ENU-induced point mutations in male germ cells and inherited germline mutations in their offspring. Genes Environ 43(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-021-00216-z
Meier B, Volkova NV, Gerstung M, Gartner A (2020) Analysis of mutational signatures in C. elegans: implications for cancer genome analysis. DNA Repair 95:102957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102957
Morgan WF, Day JP, Kaplan MI, McGhee EM, Limoli CL (1996) Genomic instability induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 146(3):247–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579454
Morrison SJ, Kimble J (2006) Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature 441(7097):1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04956
Nei M (2007) The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(30):12235–12242. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703349104
OECD (2022) Test no. 488: transgenic rodent somatic and germ cell gene mutation assays. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203907-en
Ophet Veld CW, van Hees-Stuivenberg S, van Zeeland AA, Jansen JG (1997) Effect of nucleotide excision repair on hprt gene mutations in rodent cells exposed to DNA ethylating agents. Mutagenesis 12(6):417–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/12.6.417
Pan B, Kaldhone P, Alund A et al (2021) Mutagenicity of silver nanoparticles evaluated using whole genome sequencing in mouse lymphoma cells. Nanotoxicology 15(3):418–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2021.1894614
Pazdernik N, Schedl T (2013) Introduction to germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Adv Exp Med Bio 757:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_1
Pegg AE, Scicchitano D, Dolan ME (1984) Comparison of the rates of repair of O6-alkylguanines in DNA by rat liver and bacterial O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Cancer Res 44(9):3806–3811
Petersen C, Dirksen P, Schulenburg H (2015) Why we need more ecology for genetic models such as C. elegans. Trends Genet 31(3):120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2014.12.001
Poduri A, Evrony GD, Cai X, Walsh CA (2013) Somatic mutation, genomic variation, and neurological disease. Science 341(6141):1237758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237758
Prise KM, Pinto M, Newman HC, Michael BD (2001) A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double-strand break clustering. Radiat Res 156(5):572–576. https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0572:Arosoi]2.0.Co;2
Radman M, Villani G, Boiteux S, Kinsella AR, Glickman BW, Spadari S (1979) Replicational fidelity: mechanisms of mutation avoidance and mutation fixation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 43(Pt 2):937–946. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1979.043.01.103
Rao S, Chenna A, Slupska M, Singer B (1996) Replication of O4-methylthymine-containing oligonucleotides: effect of 3’ and 5’ flanking bases on formation and extension of O4-methylthymine guanine basepairs. Mutat Res 356(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(96)00052-8
Russell LB, Selby PB, von Halle E, Sheridan W, Valcovic L (1981) The mouse specific-locus test with agents other than radiations: interpretation of data and recommendations for future work. Mutat Res 86(3):329–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1110(81)90010-5
Seydoux G, Schedl T (2001) The germline in C. elegans: origins, proliferation, and silencing. Int Rev Cytol 203:139–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(01)03006-6
Speit G, Vasquez M, Hartmann A (2009) The comet assay as an indicator test for germ cell genotoxicity. Mutat Res-Rev Mutat 681(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.005
Stiernagle T (2006) Maintenance of C. elegans. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1
Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN (1983) The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 100(1):64–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4
Sulston J (1988) Methods in the nematode. Caenorhabditis elegans 587–606
Tates AD (1992) Validation studies with the micronucleus test for early spermatids of rats—a tool for detecting clastogenicity of chemicals in differentiating spermatogonia and spermatocytes. Mutagenesis 7(6):411–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/7.6.411
Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C et al (2013) From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinform 43:33. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi1110s43
Wong PK (1988) Mutagenicity of heavy-metals. B Environ Contam Tox 40(4):597–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01688386
Wong WS, Solomon BD, Bodian DL et al (2016) New observations on maternal age effect on germline de novo mutations. Nat Commun 7:10486. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10486
Wu J, Li L, Wang P, You C, Williams NL, Wang Y (2016) Translesion synthesis of O4-alkylthymidine lesions in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 44(19):9256–9265. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw662
Wu J, Wang P, Li L, You C, Wang Y (2018) Cytotoxic and mutagenic properties of minor-groove O2-alkylthymidine lesions in human cells. J Biol Chem 293(22):8638–8644. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.003133
Yauk CL, Aardema MJ, van Benthem J et al (2015) Approaches for identifying germ cell mutagens: report of the 2013 IWGT workshop on germ cell assays. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En 783:36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.01.008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There was no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The information in these materials is not a formal dissemination of information by FDA and does not represent agency position or policy.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, H., Pan, B., Alund, A.W. et al. Evaluation of mutagenic susceptibility of different stages in germ cell development of Caenorhabditis elegans using whole genome sequencing. Arch Toxicol 97, 2261–2272 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03526-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03526-z