Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applying the adverse outcome pathway concept for assessing non-monotonic dose responses: biphasic effect of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on testosterone levels

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male reproduction is one of the primary health endpoints identified in rodent studies for some phthalates, such as DEHP (Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate), DBP (Dibutyl phthalate), and BBP (Benzyl butyl phthalate). The reduction in testosterone level was used as an intermediate key event for grouping some phthalates and to establish a reference point for risk assessment. Phthalates, and specifically DEHP, are one of the chemicals for which the greatest number of non-monotonic dose responses (NMDRs) are observed. These NMDRs cover different endpoints and situations, often including testosterone levels. The presence of NMDR has been the subject of some debate within the area of chemical risk assessment, which is traditionally anchored around driving health-based guidance values for apical endpoints that typically follow a clear monotonic dose–response. The consequence of NMDR for chemical risk assessment has recently received considerable attention amongst regulatory agencies, which confirmed its relevance particularly for receptor-mediated effects. The present review explores the relationship between DEHP exposure and testosterone levels, investigating the biological plausibility of the observed NMDRs. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) concept is applied to integrate NMDRs into Key Event Relationships (KERs) for exploring a mechanistic understanding of initial key events and possibly associated reproductive and non-reproductive adverse outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://open.efsa.europa.eu.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. C. Astuto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

At the time of submission of this manuscript, the authors are members of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Scientific Committee Working Group on Non-Monotonic Dose Responses. D Benford, T Halldorsson, J Schlatter and M Younes are members of the EFSA Scientific Committee; L Bodin and R Sharpe are hearing experts for this Working Group; J Tarazona is employed as staff and I Cattaneo as trainee by EFSA; MC Astuto holds an interim position at EFSA c/o Randstad. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official position of EFSA. EFSA assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 160 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Astuto, M.C., Benford, D., Bodin, L. et al. Applying the adverse outcome pathway concept for assessing non-monotonic dose responses: biphasic effect of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on testosterone levels. Arch Toxicol 97, 313–327 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03409-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03409-9

Keywords

Navigation