Skip to main content
Log in

Differential impact of JUUL flavors on pulmonary immune modulation and oxidative stress responses in male and female mice

  • Immunotoxicology
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

JUUL is a popular e-cigarette brand that manufactures e-liquids in a variety of flavors, such as mango and mint. Despite their popularity, the pulmonary effects of flavored JUUL e-liquids that are aerosolized and subsequently inhaled are not known. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate if acute exposure to JUUL e-cigarette aerosols in three popular flavors elicits an immunomodulatory or oxidative stress response in mice. We first developed a preclinical model that mimics human use patterns of e-cigarettes using 1 puff/min or 4 puffs/min exposure regimes. Based on cotinine levels, these exposures were representative of light/occasional and moderate JUUL users. We then exposed C57BL/6 mice to JUUL e-cigarette aerosols in mango, mint, and Virginia tobacco flavors containing 5% nicotine for 3 days, and assessed the inflammatory and oxidative stress response in the lungs and blood. In response to the 1 puff/min regime (light/occasional user), there were minimal changes in BAL cell composition or lung mRNA expression. However, at 4 puffs/min (moderate user), mint-flavored JUUL significantly increased lung neutrophils, while mango-flavored JUUL significantly increased Tnfα and Il13 mRNA in the lungs. Both the 1- and 4 puffs/min regimes significantly increased oxidative stress markers in the blood, indicating systemic effects. Thus, JUUL products are not inert; even short-term inhalation of flavored JUUL e-cigarette aerosols differentially causes immune modulation and oxidative stress responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Quebec Respiratory Health Research Network (QRHN) and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). C.J.B. is supported by a salary award from the Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQ-S). H.T. was supported by fellowships from the Réseau de recherche en santé réspiratoire du Québec (RSR) Scholarship and Meakins-Christie Laboratories. B.A. is supported by a Saudi Student Scholarship from the Ministry of Education (MOE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data curation and/or analysis: TB, HT, SP, and BA; funding acquisition: KKM and CJB; investigation: TB, HT, and CJB; methodology: TB, HT, SP, BA; KKM, and CJB; project administration: KKM and CJB; resources: KKM and CJB; supervision: KKM and CJB; intellectual contributions: KKM, DHE, and CJB; manuscript writing, review, and editing: TB, HT, SP, BA, KKM, DHE, and CJB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn J. Baglole.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures involving mice were approved by the McGill University Animal Care Committee (Protocol number 2013-7421) and carried out in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Been, T., Traboulsi, H., Paoli, S. et al. Differential impact of JUUL flavors on pulmonary immune modulation and oxidative stress responses in male and female mice. Arch Toxicol 96, 1783–1798 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03269-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03269-3

Keywords

Navigation