Skip to main content
Log in

Low doses of uranium and osteoclastic bone resorption: key reciprocal effects evidenced using new in vitro biomimetic models of bone matrix

  • Organ Toxicity and Mechanisms
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uranium is widely spread in the environment due to its natural and anthropogenic occurrences, hence the importance of understanding its impact on human health. The skeleton is the main site of long-term accumulation of this actinide. However, interactions of this metal with biological processes involving the mineralized extracellular matrix and bone cells are still poorly understood. To get a better insight into these interactions, we developed new biomimetic bone matrices containing low doses of natural uranium (up to 0.85 µg of uranium per cm2). These models were characterized by spectroscopic and microscopic approaches before being used as a support for the culture and differentiation of pre-osteoclastic cells. In doing so, we demonstrate that uranium can exert opposite effects on osteoclast resorption depending on its concentration in the bone microenvironment. Our results also provide evidence for the first time that resorption contributes to the remobilization of bone matrix-bound uranium. In agreement with this, we identified, by HRTEM, uranium phosphate internalized in vesicles of resorbing osteoclasts. Thanks to the biomimetic matrices we developed, this study highlights the complex mutual effects between osteoclasts and uranium. This demonstrates the relevance of these 3D models to further study the cellular mechanisms at play in response to uranium storage in bone tissue, and thus better understand the impact of environmental exposure to uranium on human bone health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files] or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Chantal Cros and Colette Ricort for helpful technical assistance. The authors acknowledge the MARS beamline of SOLEIL synchrotron (Gif sur Yvette, France) that was used to perform XAS experiments and the IRCAN's Molecular and Cellular Core Imaging (PICMI) Facility which is supported by grants from the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, the Région PACA, the Conseil Départemental des Alpes Maritimes, INSERM, the FEDER, the GIS IBiSA, the Canceropole PACA and the foundation ARC.

Funding

The author’s lab work was funded by Université Côte d’Azur (UCA) and grants from the CEA (“Programme Transversal de Toxicologie Nucléaire”) and the ANR (ANR-16-CE34-0003-01). CCMA electron microscopy equipments have been funded by the Région Sud PACA, the Conseil Départemental des Alpes Maritimes and the GIS-IBiSA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Santucci-Darmanin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gritsaenko, T., Pierrefite-Carle, V., Creff, G. et al. Low doses of uranium and osteoclastic bone resorption: key reciprocal effects evidenced using new in vitro biomimetic models of bone matrix. Arch Toxicol 95, 1023–1037 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02966-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02966-1

Keywords

Navigation