Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling dose–response functions for combination treatments with log-logistic or Weibull functions

  • In silico
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dose–response curves of new substances in toxicology and related areas are commonly fitted using log-logistic functions. In more advanced studies, an additional interest is often how these substances will behave when applied in combination with a second substance. Here, an essential question for both design and analysis of these combination experiments is whether the resulting dose–response function will still be a member of the class of log-logistic functions, and, if so, what function parameters will result for the combined substances. Different scenarios might be considered in regard to whether a true interaction between the substances is expected, or whether the combination will simply be additive. In this paper, it is shown that the resulting function will in general not be a log-logistic function, but can be approximated very closely with one. Parameters for this approximation can be predicted from the parameters of both ingredients. Furthermore, some simple interaction structures can still be represented with a single log-logistic function. The approach can also be applied to Weibull-type dose–response functions, and similar results are obtained. Finally, the results were applied to a real data set obtained from cell culture experiments involving two cancer treatments, and the dose–response curve of a combination treatment was predicted from the properties of the singular substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bykov V, Zhang Q, Zhang M, Ceder S, Abrahmsen L, Wiman K (2016) Targeting of mutant p53 and the cellular redox balance by apr-246 as a strategy for efficient cancer therapy. Front Oncol 6:21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chou T (2006) Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev 58:621–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clothier R, Gomez-Lechon M, Honegger P, Kinsner-Ovaskainen A, Kopp-Schneider A (2013) Comparative analysis of eight cytotoxicity endpoints within the acutetox project. Toxicol In Vitro 27:1347–1356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goutelle S, Maurin M, Rougier F, Barbaut X, Bourguignon L, Ducher M, Maire P (2008) The hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 22(6):633–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greco W, Bravo G, Pasons J (1995) The search for synergy: A critical review from a response surface perspective. Pharmacol Rev 47(2):331–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Wikstrand C, Friedman H, Bigner S, Pleasure S, Trojanowski J, Bigner D (1991) Differentiation characteristics of newly established medulloblastoma cell lines (d384 med, d425 med, and d458 med) and their transplantable xenografts. Lab Invest 64(4):833–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland-Letz T, Kopp-Schneider A (2015) Optimal experimental designs for dose-response studies with continuous endpoints. Arch Toxicol 89(11):2059–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland-Letz T, Kopp-Schneider A (2017) Optimal experimental designs for estimating the drug interaction index in toxicology. Comput Stat Data Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2017.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Kong M, Ayers G, Lotan R (2007) Interaction index and different methods for determining drug interaction in combination therapy. J Biopharm Stat 17:461–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe S, Muischnek H (1926) Effect of combinations: mathematical basis of the problem. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 114:313–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall J (2006) Analysis of dose-response studies—Emax model. In: Ting N (ed) Dose finding in drug development. Springer, New York, pp 127–145

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz C (2010) Toward a unified approach to dose-response modeling in ecotoxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(1):220–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz C, Streibig J (2014) From additivity to synergism—a modelling perspective. Synergy 1:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz C, Baty F, Streibig JC, Gerhard D (2015) Dose-response analysis using. PLOS One. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146021. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  • Vakil V, Trappe W (2019) Drug combinations: Mathematical modeling and networking methods. Phamaceutics. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11050208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer M, Jiang X, Pontaa O, Stanzel S, Freyberger A, Kopp-Schneider A (2012) The impact of data transformations on concentration-response modeling. Toxicol Lett 213:292–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Darell Doty Bigner for the friendly gift of the D425 Med cell line.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Holland-Letz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holland-Letz, T., Leibner, A. & Kopp-Schneider, A. Modeling dose–response functions for combination treatments with log-logistic or Weibull functions. Arch Toxicol 94, 197–204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02631-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02631-2

Keywords

Navigation