Skip to main content
Log in

Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: enabling route-to-route extrapolation

  • Regulatory Toxicology
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The TTC concept uses toxicological data from animal testing to derive generic human exposure threshold values (TTC values), below which the risk of adverse effects on human health is considered to be low. It uses distributions of no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for substances. The 5th percentile value is divided by an uncertainty factor (100) to give a TTC value. As the toxicological data underpinning the TTC concept are from tests with oral exposure, the exposure is to be understood as an external oral exposure. For risk assessment of substances with a low absorption (by the oral route, or through skin), the internal exposure is more relevant than the external exposure. European legislation allows that tests might not be necessary for substances with negligible absorption with low internal exposure. The aim of this work is to derive internal TTC values to allow the TTC concept to be applied to situations of low internal exposure. The external NOAEL of each chemical of three databases (Munro, ELINCS, Food Contact Materials) was multiplied by the bioavailability of the individual chemical. Oral bioavailability was predicted using an in silico prediction tool (ACD Percepta). After applying a reduced uncertainty factor of 25, we derived internal TTC values. For Cramer class I, the internal TTC values are 6.9 μg/kg bw/d (90 % confidence interval: 3.8–11.5 mg/kg bw/d); for Cramer class II/III 0.1 μg/kg bw/d (90 % confidence interval: 0.08–0.14 μg/kg bw/d).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACD/Percepta, available from ACD/Labs, Inc., Ontario, Canada http://www.acdlabs.com/products/percepta/

  • Adler S, Basketter D, Creton S et al (2011) Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects. Arch Toxicol 85(5):367–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bessems JG, Loizou G, Krishnan K et al (2014) PBTK modelling platforms and parameter estimation tools to enable animal-free risk assessment. Recommendations from a joint EURL ECVAM–EPAA workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 68:119–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boobis A, Gundert-Remy U, Kremers P et al (2002) In silico prediction of ADME and pharmacokinetics. Report of an expert meeting organised by COST B15. Eur J Pharm Sci 17:183–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer GM, Ford RA, Hall RL (1978) Estimation of toxic hazard: a decision tree approach. Food Cosm Toxicol 16:255–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst I, Renwick AG (2013) Evaluation of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) – challenges and approaches. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 65:168–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2012a) Scientific Opinion on Exploring options for providing advice about possible human health risks based on the concept of Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). EFSA Scientific Committee. EFSA Journal (2012) 10(7):2750

  • EFSA (2012b) Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) (2012) Guidance for submission for food additive evaluations. EFSA J 10(7):2760 [60 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2760

  • Escher SE, Tluczkiewicz I, Batke M et al (2010) Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58:259–274

  • European Commission (2009) http://esis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php?PGM=eli (09/25/2012)

  • European Union (2012) Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER), Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) Opinion on Use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) Approach for Human Safety Assessment of Chemical Substances with focus on Cosmetics and Consumer Products, ISBN 978-92-79-30699-0, doi:10.2772/2058. http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_092.pdf

  • Kalberlah F, Schneider K (1998) Examination of the data as the basis for the quantification of extrapolation facotrs. In: Final report of the research project No. 116 06 113 of the German federal Environmental Agency, p 797

  • Kalkhof H, Herzler M, Stahlmann R, Gundert-Remy U (2012) Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification. Arch Toxicol 86(1):17–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes R, Galli C et al (2000) Thjreshoild of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing. Food Chem Toxicol 38:255–312

  • Kroes R, Renwick AG et al (2004) Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food Chem Toxicol 42:65–83

  • Munro IC, Ford RA, Kennepohl E, Sprenger JG (1996) Correlation of structural class with no-observed effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. Food Chem Toxicol 34:829–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA et al (2011) Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J Cheminform 3:33

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinelli R, Croera C, Theobald A, Feigenbaum A (2011) Threshold of toxicological concern approach for the risk assessment of substances used for the manufacture of plastic food materials. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) 2006 R1907–EN–09.10.2012–014.001–1

  • Renwick AG (1993) Data-derived safety factors for the evaluation of food additives and environmental contaminants. Food Addit Contam 10:275–305

  • Reynolds DP, Lanevskij K, Japertas P et al (2009) Ionization-specific analysis of human intestinal absorption. J Pharm Sci 98(11):4039–4054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider K, Hassauer M, Oltmanns J, Schuhmacher-Wolz U, Elmhäuser E, Mosbach-Schulz O (2005) Uncertainty analysis in workplace effect assessment. Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden, pp 40–55

  • Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER); Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) (2013) Addressing the New Challenges for Risk Assessment http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/scenihr_09-13/opinions_en.htm Accessed 30 June 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented does not represent the position of the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment but solely the authors’ opinion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula Gundert-Remy.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Partosch, F., Mielke, H., Stahlmann, R. et al. Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: enabling route-to-route extrapolation. Arch Toxicol 89, 941–948 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1287-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1287-6

Keywords

Navigation