Skip to main content
Log in

Low-dose extrapolation in toxicology: an old controversy revisited

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bolt HM, Marchan R, Hengstler JG (2009) Low-dose extrapolation in toxicology: an old controversy revisited. Arch Toxicol 83:197–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese EJ (2009) The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment. Arch Toxicol 83:203–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahmann D, Taeger D, Kappler M, Buchte S, Morfeld P, Bruning T, Pesch B (2008) Assessment of exposure in epidemiological studies: the example of silica dust. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 18:452–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz WK, Gaylor DW, Conolly RB, Lutz RW (2005) Nonlinearity and thresholds in dose-response relationships for carcinogenicity due to sampling variation, logarithmic dose scaling, or small differences in individual susceptibility. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207:565–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mannetje A, Steenland K, Checkoway H, Koskela RS, Koponen M, Attfield M, Chen J, Hnizdo E, DeKlerk N, Dosemeci M (2002) Development of quantitative exposure data for a pooled exposure-response analysis of 10 silica cohorts. Am J Ind Med 42:73–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pesch B, Kappler M, Straif K, Marczynski B, Preuss R, Rossbach B, Rihs HP, Weiss T, Rabstein S, Pierl C, Scherenberg M, Adams A, Kafferlein HU, Angerer J, Wilhelm M, Seidel A, Bruning T (2007) Dose-response modeling of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with biomarkers of exposure and effect. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1863–1873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pesch B, Pierl CB, Gebel M, Gross I, Becker D, Johnen G, Rihs HP, Donhuijsen K, Lepentsiotis V, Meier M, Schulze J, Bruning T (2008) Occupational risks for adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in the German wood industry. Occup Environ Med 65:191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamm R (2001) MEGA-database: one million data since 1972. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 16:159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steenland K, Deddens JA (2004) A practical guide to dose-response analyses and risk assessment in occupational epidemiology. Epidemiology 15:63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1986) Guidelines for carcinogenic risk assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fed Reg 51:33992–34003

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent R, Jeandel B (2001) COLCHIC-occupational exposure to chemical agents database: current content and development perspectives. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 16:115–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beate Pesch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pesch, B., Spickenheuer, A., Taeger, D. et al. Low-dose extrapolation in toxicology: an old controversy revisited. Arch Toxicol 83, 639–640 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-009-0449-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-009-0449-4

Keywords

Navigation