Skip to main content
Log in

Low levels of methylmercury induce DNA damage in rats: protective effects of selenium

  • Inorganic Compounds
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 November 2008

Abstract

In this study we examined the possible antigenotoxic effect of selenium (Se) in rats chronically exposed to low levels of methylmercury (MeHg) and the association between glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity and DNA lesions (via comet assay) in the same exposed animals. Rats were divided into six groups as follows: (Group I) received water; (Group II) received MeHg (100 μg/day); (Group III) received Se (2 mg/L drinking water); (Group IV) received Se (6 mg/L drinking water); (Group V) received MeHg (100 μg/day) and Se (2 mg/L drinking water); (Group VI) received MeHg (100 μg/day) and Se (6 mg/L drinking water). Total treatment time was 100 days. GSH-Px activity was determined spectrophotometrically and DNA damage was determined by comet assay. Mean GSH-Px activity in groups I, II, III, IV, V and VI were, respectively: 40.19 ± 17.21; 23.63 ± 6.04; 42.64 ± 5.70; 38.50 ± 7.15; 34.54 ± 6.18 and 41.39 ± 11.67 nmolNADPH/min/gHb. DNA damage was represented by a mean score from 0 to 300; the results for groups I, II, III, IV, V and VI were, respectively: 6.87 ± 3.27; 124.12 ± 13.74; 10.62 ± 3.81; 13.25 ± 1.76; 86.87 ± 11.95 and 76.25 ± 7.48. There was a significant inhibition of GSH-Px activity in group II compared with group I (P < 0.05). Groups V and VI did not show a difference in enzyme activity compared with groups III and IV, showing the possible protective action of Se. Comet assay presented a significant difference in DNA migration between group II and group I (P < 0.0001). Groups V and VI showed a significant reduction in MeHg-induced genotoxicity (P < 0.001) when compared with group II. A negative correlation (r = −0.559, P < 0.05) was found between GSH-Px activity and DNA lesion, showing that the greater the DNA damage, the lower the GSH-Px activity. Our findings demonstrated the oxidative and genotoxic properties of MeHg, even at low doses. Moreover, Se co-administration reestablished GSH-Px activity and reduced DNA damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson D, Plewa MJ (1998) The international comet assay workshop. Mutagen 13:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher M, Syversen T (2005) Methylmercury: recent advances in the understanding of its neurotoxicity. Ther Drug Monit 27:278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au WW, Salama SA, Sierra-Torres CH (2003) Funcional characterization of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes using cytogenetic challenge assays. Environ Health Perspect 111:1843–1850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ozer EY, Rosenspire AJ, McCabe MJ, Worth RG, Kinzelskii AL, Warra NS, Petty HR (2000) Mercuric chloride damages cellular DNA by a non-apoptotic mechanism. Mutat Res 470:19–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulat P, Dujić I, Potkonjak B, Vidaković A (1998) Activity of glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase in workers occupationally exposed to mercury. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebulska-Wasilewska I, Panek A, Zabinski Z, Moszczynski P, Au WW (2005) Occupational exposure to mercury vapour on genotoxicity and DNA repair. Mutat Res 586:102–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Qu L, Li B, Xing L, Jia G, Wang T, Gao Y, Zhang P, Li M, Chen W, Chai Z (2005) Increased oxidative DNA damage, as assessed by urinary 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine concentrations, and serum redox status in persons exposed to mercury. Clin Chem 51:759–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christie N, Cantoni O, Sugiyama M, Cattabeni F, Costa M (1985) Differences in the effects of Hg(II) on DNA repair induced in Chinese hamster ovary by ultraviolet or X-rays. Mol Pharmacol 24:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs GF Jr, Combs SB (1984) The nutritional biochemistry of selenium. Ann Rev Nutr 4:257–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo-López ME, de Sá AL, Herculano AM, Burbano RR, do Nascimento JLM (2007) Methylmercury genotoxicity: a novel effect in human cells lines of the central nervous systems. Environ Int 33:141–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curvin-Aralar MLA, Furness RW (1991) Mercury and selenium: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 21:348–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva J, Freitas TRO, Marinho JR, Speit G, Erdtmann B (2000) An alkali single-cell gel eletroforesis (comet) assay for environmental biomonitoring with native rodents. Genet Mol Biol 23:241–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Bayoumy K (2001) The protective role of selenium on genetic damage and on cancer. Mutat Res 475:123–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fadini PS, Jardim W (2001) Is the Negro River Basin (Amazon) impacted by naturally occurring mercury? Sci Total Environ 275:71–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falnoga I, Tusek-Znidaric M (2007) Selenium-mercury interactions in man and animals. Biol Trace Elem Res 119:212–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fairban DW, Olive PL, O’neill KL (1995) The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat Res 339:37–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco JL, Braga HC, Stringari J, Missau FC, Posser T, Mendes BG, Leal RB, Santos ARS, Dafre AL, Pizzolatti MG, Farina M (2007) Comparative study of activities in reactiveoxygen species production/defense system in mitochondria of rat brain and liver, and their susceptibility to methylmercury toxicity Chem. Res Toxicol 20:1919–1926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girardi G, Elias MM (1995) Mercury chloride effects on rat renal redox enzymes activities: SOD protection. Free Rad Biol Med 18:61–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganther HE (1999) Selenium metabolism, selenoproteins and mechanisms of cancer prevention: complexities with thioredoxin reductase. Carcinogenesis 20:1657–1666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig A (1995) Current aspects in metal genotoxicity. Biometal 8:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Chan HM, Lok E, Kapal K, Taylor M, Kubow S, Mehta R (2008) Dietary fats modulate methylmercury-mediated systemic oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2008.01.01

  • Kobal AB, Prezelj M, Horvat M, Krsnik M, Gibicar D, Osredkar J (2007) Glutathione levels after long-term occupational elemental mercury exposure. Environ Res. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2007.07.001

  • Kobayashi H, Sugiyama C, Morikawa Y, Hayashy M, Sofuni T (1995) A comparison between manual microscopic analysis and computerized image analysis in the single cell gel electrophoresis assay. MMS Commun 3 (1995):103–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel J, Mergler D, Lucotte M, Amorim M, Dolbec J, Miranda D, Arantès G, Rheault I, Pichet P (1996) Evidence of early nervous system dysfunction in Amazonian populations exposed to low-levels of methylmercury. Neurotoxicol 7:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Letavayová L, Vlcková V, Brozmanová J (2006) Selenium: from cancer prevention to DNA damage. Toxicology 227:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manoharan K, Banerjee MR (1985) β-Carotene reduces sister chromatid exchange induce chemical carcinogens in mouse mammary cells in organ culture. Cell Biol Int Rep 9:783–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RP, Reinfelder JR, Morel FM (1996) Uptake, toxicity and trophic transfer of mercury in a coastal diatom. Environ Sci Technol 30:1835–1845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mori N, Yasutake A, Hirayama K (2007) Mercurial-induced hydrogen peroxide generation in mouse brain mitochondria: protective effects of quercetin. Arch Toxicol 81:769–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moszczynski P, Rutowski J, Słowinski S, Bem S (2008) Immunological effects of occupational exposure to metallic mercury in the population of T-cells and NK-cells. Analyst 123:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paglia DE, Valentine WN (1967) Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med 70:158–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passos CJS, Sampaio DS, Lemire M, Fillion M, Guimarães JRD, Lucotte M, Mergler D (2008) Daily mercury intake in fish-eating populations in the Brazilian Amazon. Exp Sci Environ Epidemiol 18:76–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall D, Burger J (2003) Methodologies for assessing exposure to metals: speciation, bioavailability of metals and ecological hosts factors. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56:110–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rotruck JT, Pope AL, Ganther HE, Swanson AB, Hafeman DG, Hoekstra WG (1973) Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 179:588–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roulet M, Lucotte M, Farella N, Serique G, Coelho H, Passos CJS, da Silva EJ, de Andrade PS, Mergler D, Guimarães JRD, Amorim M (1999) Effects of recent human colonization on the presence of mercury in Amazonian ecosystems. Water Air Soil Poll 112:297–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski J, Moszczynski P, Bem S, Szewczyk A (1998) Efficacy of urine determination of early renal damage markers for nephrotoxicity monitoring during occupational exposure to mercury vapours. Med Pracy 49:129–135

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarafian TA (1999) Methylmercuty-induced generation of free radical: biological implications. Met Ions Biol Syst 36:415–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL (1988) A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175:184–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stohs SJ, Bagchi D (1995) Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol Med 18:321–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran D, Moody AJ, Fisher AS, Foulkes ME, Jha AN (2007) Protective effects of selenium on mercury-induced DNA damage in mussel haemocytes. Aquat Toxicol 84:11–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen KJ, Rissanen TH, Voutilainen S, Tuomainen TP (2007) Mercury as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. J Nutr Biochem 18:75–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoneda S, Suzuki KT (1997) Equimolar Hg–Se complex binds to selenoprotein P. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 231:7–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waters MD, Brady AL, Stack HF, Brockman HE (1990) Antimutagenic profiles for some model compounds. Mutat Res 238:57–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the São Paulo State Foundation for Scientific Research (FAPESP, Brazil) and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technologic Development (CNPq) in the form of doctoral fellowships. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Barbosa Jr.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-008-0387-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grotto, D., Barcelos, G.R.M., Valentini, J. et al. Low levels of methylmercury induce DNA damage in rats: protective effects of selenium. Arch Toxicol 83, 249–254 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-008-0353-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-008-0353-3

Keywords

Navigation