Skip to main content
Log in

Proteus appendicitidis sp. nov., isolated from the appendiceal pus of an appendicitis patient in Yongzhou, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, short rod-shaped bacterium, designated as strain HZ0627T, was isolated from the appendiceal pus of a patient with appendicitis in Yongzhou, Hunan, China. This strain was subjected to comprehensive phenotypic, phylogenetic, and genomic analyses using polyphasic taxonomic methods. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed that this strain belonged to the genus Proteus and the family Morganellaceae, whereas that based on the rpoB gene sequence and phylogenomic analysis demonstrated that this strain was distinctly separated from other type strains of Proteus species. Moreover, whole-genome-based analyses, including in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (isDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI), revealed that strain HZ0627T had much lower isDDH rates (24.5–55.6%) and ANI (82.04–93.90%) than those of the thresholds (i.e., 70% and 95%, respectively) for species delineation, when compared to the type strains of other Proteus species. The cellular fatty acid profile of strain HZ0627T was dominated by C16:0 (34.5%), cyclo C17:0 (25.8%), C14:0 (12.6%), C16:1 iso I/14:0 3-OH (7.7%), C18:1ω7c/18:1ω6c (6.5%), and C16:1ω7c/16:1ω6c (4.9%), which clearly differentiated it from the documented type strains of Proteus species. In addition, several specific physiological traits, including optimal growth temperature, tolerance to sodium chloride, and carbon source utilization, differed from those of other Proteus species. Therefore, we propose the name Proteus appendicitidis sp. nov. for strain HZ0627T (= CCTCC AB 2022380T = KCTC 92986T), which represents the type strain of this novel Proteus species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and rpoB gene sequences of strain HZ0627T are OQ627395 and OQ630941, respectively. The GenBank accession number for the complete genome sequence of strain HZ0627T is CP127389.

Abbreviations

ANI:

Average nucleotide identity

isDDH:

In silico DNA–DNA hybridization

ML:

Maximum likelihood

LBA:

Luria–bertani agar

CFAs:

Cellular fatty acids

BGCs:

Biosynthesis gene clusters

References

  • Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M (2010) Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2:117–134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bakkar FA, Zubair M (2019) Molecular study based on Proteus mirabilis contamination in chicken meat in selected districts of Kerala. India Int J Dev Res 9(06):28367–28369

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J (2018) fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:884–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLSI (2021) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, M100, 31st ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA

  • Colston SM, Fullmer MS, Beka L, Lamy B, Gogarten JP, Graf J (2014) Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using Aeromonas as a test case. Mbio 5(6):e02136-e2214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dai H, Wang Y, Fang Y, Huang Z, Kan B, Wang D (2018) Proteus alimentorum sp. nov., isolated from pork and lobster in Ma’anshan city. China. Int J Syst Evol Micr 68(4):1390–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai H, Wang Y, Fang Y, Xiao T, Huang Z, Kan B et al (2018) Proteus columbae sp. nov., isolated from a pigeon in Ma’anshan. China. Int J Syst Evol Micr 68(2):552–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai H, Chen A, Wang Y, Lu B, Wang Y, Chen J et al (2019) Proteus faecis sp. nov., and Proteus cibi sp. nov., two new species isolated from food and clinical samples in China. Int J Syst Evol Micr 69(3):852–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giammanco GM, Grimont PA, Grimont F, Lefevre M, Giammanco G, Pignato S (2011) Phylogenetic analysis of the genera proteus, morganella and providencia by comparison of rpoB gene sequences of type and clinical strains suggests the reclassification of Proteus myxofaciens in a new genus, cosenzaea gen. nov., as cosenzaea myxofaciens comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Micr 61(7):1638–1644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton AL, Kamm MA, Ng SC, Morrison M (2018) Proteus spp. as putative gastrointestinal pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00085-17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Han P, Luo L, Shahid M, Li M, Wang S, Nobrega DB et al (2020) Prevalence, genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Proteus mirabilis isolated from dogs hospitalized in Beijing. Pak Vet J 40(1):61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HT, Mongodin EF, Davenport KP, Fraser CM, Sandler AD, Zeichner SL (2014) Culture-independent evaluation of the appendix and rectum microbiomes in children with and without appendicitis. PLoS One 9(4):e95414

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Q, Wang X, Zhao J, Liu Z, Ji F, Chang H et al (2021) Multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis isolates carrying blaOXA-1 and blaNDM-1 from wildlife in China: increasing public health risk. Integr Zool 16(6):798–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khayyat AN, Abbas HA, Mohamed MF, Asfour HZ, Khayat MT, Ibrahim TS et al (2021) Not only antimicrobial: metronidazole mitigates the virulence of Proteus mirabilis isolated from macerated diabetic foot ulcer. Appl Sci 11(15):6847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33(7):1870–1874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lane D (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Goodfellow M, Stackebrandt E (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 115–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Lob SH, Badal RE, Bouchillon SK, Hawser SP, Hackel MA, Hoban DJ (2013) Epidemiology and susceptibility of Gram-negative appendicitis pathogens: SMART 2008–2010. Surg Infect 14(2):203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Kolthoff JP, Klenk H-P, Göker M (2014) Taxonomic use of DNA G+ C content and DNA–DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Micr 64(Pt_2):352–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT et al (2015) Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31(22):3691–3693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parte AC, Carbasse JS, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M (2020) List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Micr 70(11):5607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP (2010) FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5(3):e9490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106(45):19126–19131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J (2016) JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32(6):929–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE (2017) Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13(6):e1005595

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Hoedt EC, Liu Q, Berendsen E, Teh JJ, Hamilton A et al (2021) Elucidation of Proteus mirabilis as a key bacterium in Crohn’s disease inflammation. Gastroenterology 160(1):317-330. e11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (grant number JCYJ20230808105208017) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 41907214].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.H. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. Z.Z. isolated and purified the bacteria strain. H.Q. and G.C. performed the polyphasic analyses. W.Z., J.Z., and Y.P. reviewed and revised the manuscript. X.C. conceived and funded the study and drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yao Peng or Xunchao Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Central Hospital of Yongzhou (June 23, 2022; IRB No. 2022062301) and was compliant with all relevant ethical regulations.

Additional information

Communicated by Yusuf Akhter.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 399 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Zhang, Z., Qu, H. et al. Proteus appendicitidis sp. nov., isolated from the appendiceal pus of an appendicitis patient in Yongzhou, China. Arch Microbiol 206, 171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-024-03887-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-024-03887-8

Keywords

Navigation