Abstract
The cDNA library prepared from Lentinula edodes, Hokken 600 (H600), primordia was screened using cDNA expressed specifically in Dictyostelium discoideum prestalk as a probe. Twenty-one clones, Le-Dd1 ~ 21, were isolated from the L. edodes primordia cDNA library. Functional analysis of each gene was carried out by transformation into protoplast cells from L. edodes Mori 252 (M252) mycelia with the overexpression vector pLG-RasF1 of each gene because M252 protoplast cells were transformed with an 11-fold higher efficiency than H600 cells. Transformants with the overexpression vector of Le-Dd10 formed a fruiting body at almost the same time as H600, a positive control, although M252, a negative control, did not form a fruiting body under culture conditions. This suggested that Le-Dd10 is involved in the formation of fruiting bodies. Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis revealed that Le-Dd10 is located on No. 4 linkage group of L. edodes. The properties of Le-Dd10 products were investigated by Western blotting analysis using polyclonal antibodies against GST:Le-Dd10 fusion proteins. As a result, 56-kDa, 27-kDa, and 14-kDa protein bands appeared in primordial and fruiting body stages, although the expected molecular weight of the Le-Dd10 product was 50 kDa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
One of the most common edible basidiomycetes among Japanese cultivated mushrooms is shiitake mushroom, Lentinula edodes. To produce high-quality shiitake mushrooms efficiently, the application of molecular breeding methods by artificial gene introduction is needed, in addition to crossbreeding by hybridization among cultivars as in past breeding. The mechanism of fungi fruiting body formation has been analyzed in many studies (Kües 2000; Palmer and Horton 2006). Several mutants and genes related to fruiting body development have been isolated in Coprinopsis cinerea as a model fungus, including fruiting body maturation, mat; stipe elongation, eln, eln2, eln3; cap expansion, exp1, ich1; basidiospore formation, and bad (Arima et al. 2004; Srivilai et al. 2006; Muraguchi et al. 2008). Genes expressed specifically in fruiting bodies, Le.flp1, mfbA, mfbc, and recQ, were isolated in L. edodes (Yasuda and Shishido 1999; Miyazaki et al. 2004, 2007; Katsukawa and Shishido 2005), but it is unknown whether these genes are involved in fruiting body formation of L. edodes. It is difficult to identify genes involved in fruiting body formation because of the culture conditions of L. edodes. For fruiting body formation, a long period of 2–3 months and laboratory culture system are required. Therefore, in this study, we used the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum cDNA as a probe to detect candidate genes involved in L. edodes fruiting body formation because D. discoideum cells are capable of forming a fruiting body in 24 h. Using knockout by BSR cassette (blasticidin resistance gene) insertion, each knockout mutant of three cDNA clones, namely, SSJ301 (Accession No. AJ488770), SSJ337 (Accession No. AF161253), and SSK864 (Accession No. AF140044), exhibited aberrant fruiting bodies (Takamoto et al. 2001; Kamei et al., 2003, 2013). These cDNA clones were used as a probe to screen candidate genes involved in fruiting body formation from the L. edodes primordial cDNA library. The transformants in which each endogenous gene of Le-Dd1 ~ 21 of L. edodes was overexpressed were prepared and analysis of most phenotypes was attempted. The phenotypes of the transformants were examined and the effects of overexpressed genes on fruiting body formation were investigated. Le-Dd10 findings will be used to isolate short-term culture varieties of L. edodes.
Materials and methods
Strains and culture
Dictyostelium discoideum wild-type AX2 was cultivated at 22 °C in HL5 medium. The 45 knockout mutants by BSR cassette containing bsr (blasticidin resistance gene) (Sutoh 1993) insertion of D. discoideum cDNA clones expressed specifically in stalks were prepared and grown in HL medium containing 10 μg/mL of blasticidin S (Funakoshi, Tokyo, Japan) (Sakuragi et al. 2005). These D. discoideum cDNA clones were provided from the “Dictyostelium cDNA project in Japan, https://nenkin.nbrp.jp/ clone/list” (Morio et al. 1998). Development was started by washing the cells in 17 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.1. The cells were agitated on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm or spread on agar plates, and incubated at 22 °C as reported previously (Yoshida et al. 1991). Lentinula edodes mycelia were grown on MYPG agar (0.25% malt extract, 0.1% yeast extract, 0.1% peptone, 0.5% glucose, and 0.5% low melting temperature agar) plates at 25 °C. Mycelia agar plate discs were used for inoculation into sawdust pots and culture was continued at 22 °C for 90–150 days. For single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis, parental dikaryon, MCR14, was generated from the monokaryon D703PP-9 (mating type: A1B1) obtained from D703, a New Zealand wild-type strain and the monokaryon G408PP-4 (A2B2) obtained from G408, a Japanese wild-type strain. The 23 tetrads were analyzed in the present study (Miyazaki and Neda 2004; Miyazaki et al. 2014).
Preparation of a knockout construct and transformation of Dictyostelium discoideum
The knockout vector by BSR insertion into the 45 D. discoideum cDNA clones was constructed (Sakuragi et al. 2005). A BSR cassette was inserted into the restriction enzyme site of each cDNA in pBluescript KS (-), followed by PCR-mediated amplification using rTaq DNA polymerase, T3, and T7 primers (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). PCR products were purified using QIAGEN-tip 20 (QIAGEN, Duesseldorf, Germany). The knockout construct was transformed into AX2 cells by electroporation, and transformants were independently isolated and analyzed by Southern and Northern blotting. The knockout mutants of three clones, SSJ301, SSJ337, and SSK864, formed aberrant fruiting bodies. Information on each knockout mutant has already been published (SSK864, Takamoto et al. 2001; SSJ301, Kamei et al. 2003; SSJ337, Kamei et al. 2013).
Preparation of Lentinula edodes protoplast
Protoplast cells were prepared from L. edodes Mori 252 (M252) mycelia. Protoplast cells from M252 were transformed with 11-fold higher efficiency than those from L. edodes Hokken 600 (H600) (Fujimoto et al. 2004). M252 mycelia was inoculated into MYPG agar and cultured in the dark at 25 °C, and used as an inoculum. They were inoculated into 30 mL of twofold concentrated MYPG liquid medium and cultured with shaking at 96 rpm at 25 °C for 3 days. The cultured mycelia were transferred to a homogenizer cup and crushed in a homogenizer at 9,000 rpm for 5 min on ice. Twenty mL of crushed mycelial fragments was filtered through a 100-μm cell strainer (BD Biosciences, MA, USA), added to 20 mL of MYPG liquid medium, and statically cultured for 4 days. They were washed with 10 mL of SM buffer (50 mM succinate, pH 5.6, and 0.6 M mannitol). To lyse mycelial cell walls for protoplast isolation, 1 g wet weight of mycelia was suspended in 10 mL of 2.5% cellulase Onozuka RS (Yakult Honsha, Tokyo, Japan) and 1.0% Lysing Enzyme (Merck)/SM buffer in a centrifuge tube. The tube was installed horizontally, and enzyme treatment was carried out for 4 h with shaking at 60 rpm at 28 °C.
Cloning of Lentinula edodes genes
For the L. edodes primordia cDNA library, total RNA of L. edodes H600 primordia was extracted using TRIzol®Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Two hundred μL of TRIzol was added to 0.1 g of primordia and pulverized in a mortar. Poly (A)+ RNA was purified from total RNA using a poly (A)+ RNA purification kit (GM Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the manufacturer's specifications. The cDNA was made from 5 µg of poly (A)+ RNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (GM Healthcare). It was blunted, ligated to EcoRI adaptors, phosphorylated, and size-fractionated by column chromatography. Fractions containing cDNA of longer than 500 base pairs were collected, precipitated by ethanol, and ligated into λZAP II arms (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). The ligated DNA was packaged using a GIGA Pack III Gold packaging kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The cDNA library was screened using 32P-labeled SSJ301, SSJ337, and SSK864 cDNA, respectively, as a probe. Random labeling was performed with a Radprime DNA labeling system (Invitrogen) and 20 µCi [α-32P]dCTP (GM Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Hybridization was carried out at 42 °C overnight in 6 × SSPE containing 0.05% nonfat dried milk and 50% formamide. Filters were first washed in 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at room temperature, and then in 1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 68 °C. Positive clones were sequenced on an ABI Prism®3100-Avant Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using BigDye®Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). The sequences were then compared with those registered in the GenBank™ data bank. Open reading frames were predicted using GENETXY-MAC 8.0. Homology searches of nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were carried out using BLASTX (DDBJ; http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/welcome-j.html) and Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART; http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/smart/ change_mode.pl). Le-Dd1–Le-Dd7 clones were isolated by SSJ301 with 38.1–55.1% homology, Le-Dd8–Le-Dd12 clones by SSJ337 with 41.8–45.3% homology, and Le-Dd13–Le-Dd21 clones by SSK864 with 42.1–50.6% homology.
Transformation of Lentinula edodes
The L. edodes expression vector pLG-RasF1 with hph (hygromycin resistance gene) was constructed using the promoter of the Le. Ras gene (Hori et al. 1991) and constitutively expressed in L. edodes cells (Fujimoto et al. 2004). Each gene, Le-Dd5, Le-Dd6, Le-Dd7, Le-Dd9, Le-Dd10, Le-Dd11, Le-Dd12, Le-Dd13, Le-Dd14, and Le-Dd18, was inserted into pLG-RasF1 digested with SmaI and dephosphorylated. Each cDNA expression vector was constructed (Hamada et al. 2008). For transformation of L. edodes M252 protoplasts, the REMI method (Sato et al. 1998) was used in which gene transfer into protoplasts was carried out by osmotic action. STC buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM CaCl2, and 1.2 M sorbitol) was added to the protoplast suspension to be 0.5 to 1.0 × 107/240 μL. Ten μL of STC buffer containing 10 μg of the cDNA expression vector and 10 units of SphI (or DraI or BspT104I) was added to the tube. It was gently stirred and incubated on ice for 20 min. Next, 62.5 μL of a PEG solution of 60% PEG 4000 (Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan) was added and incubated on ice for 20 min. Thereafter, 3.125 mL of the PEG solution was further added, and the mixture was kept at 25 °C for 20 min. Next, 10 mL of STC buffer was added. After centrifugation at 2,500 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min, the precipitate suspended in 4 mL of MS medium (2.0% malt extract and 0.6 M sucrose) was transferred to a plastic dish (BD Biosciences). The transformed protoplasts were cultured in an incubator at 25 °C in the dark for 3 days. They were then applied to minimal agar medium (Kües 2000), pH 4.5, 2.0 g of agar/100 mL, including 0.2% Sanpearl CP (Nippon Paper Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) and 5 μg/mL of hygromycin B (Nacalai tesque). They were cultured in an incubator at 25 °C in the dark for 4 days. Thereafter, only the culture solution was removed, and 9 mL of MYPG agar medium (0.5% low melting temperature agarose) including 20 μg/mL of hygromycin B was layered. Colonies that appeared after stratification were cultured in an incubator at 25 °C in the dark. The most marginal part of the mycelial tuft was punched with a cork borer. It was inoculated into 30 mL of MYPG medium supplemented with 0.2% Sanpearl CP and cultured in an incubator for 14 days.
Culture of L. edodes on block medium (Castanopsis sawdust medium)
Castanopsis sawdust and wheat bran were sterilized in an autoclave at 121 °C for 60 min and then mixed with the composition rate of 36% sawdust, 4% bran, and 60% DW. The mixture (90 g) was placed in a cultivation pot sterilized at 121 °C for 10 min, and was again sterilized at 121 °C for 60 min in an autoclave. The transformed mycelia that were cultured in MYPG agar medium for 14 days were punched out with a cork borer. Nine disks were inoculated into a cultivation pot. There were three cultivation periods for L. edodes mycelia: 90, 120, and 150 days, cultivation was performed with three cultivation pots for each category under 90% humidity and light irradiation at 22 °C, and the growth rate of mycelia was measured. When the period of each culture was reached, sterilized water was added to the cultivation pot in the clean bench until the medium was immersed with sterilized water. Low-temperature treatment was performed at 4 °C for 17 h, and sterile water in the cultivation pot was removed in the clean bench. Culture was continued under 90% humidity and light irradiation at 15 °C to promote fruiting body formation. The average days required for fruiting body formation and the number of cultivation pots forming a fruiting body after the low-temperature treatment were measured with three cultivation pots for each category.
Southern blotting and Northern blotting analyses using L. edodes cDNA
A cDNA probe was labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) by the random hexamer procedure using a DIG DNA labeling kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Genomic DNA was extracted from L. edodes mycelia with 2.0% Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) in 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, and 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol, and total RNA was extracted with ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) from L. edodes mycelia or transformants with the RNAi vector for Le-Dd10. Southern blotting and Northern blotting analyses were conducted using each cDNA as a probe. Twenty μg of genomic DNA digested with an appropriate restriction enzyme and ten μg of total RNA were separated on an agarose gel. After agarose gel electrophoresis, agarose gels were transferred onto Hybond™ N+nylon membrane (GM Healthcare) with VacuGeneXL (GM Healthcare). Hybridization was carried out at 42 °C for Southern blotting analysis and at 50 °C for Northern blotting analysis in DIG easy hyb (Roche Diagnostics).
Construction of RNAi for Le-Dd10
The RNAi vector for Le-Dd10 was constructed with a 146-nucleotide sequence comprising the 40-bp short homologous hairpin dsRNA sequence, a flanking sequence (6 nucleotide), and a 60-nucleotide spacer sequence, as described in a previous paper (Nakade et al. 2011). To construct the Le-Dd10 homologous inverted repeat sequence expression vector (pivrLe-Dd10), two 146-base oligonucleotide sequences LeDd10ivrF and LeDd10ivrR (Table 1) were synthesized by Eurofins genomics (Tokyo, Japan). These contained a 40-bp homologous inverted repeat sequence from Le-Dd10 exon connected to a 60-nucleotide linked loop sequence from intron 2 of Lcc1. These oligonucleotides were heated to 105 °C for 10 min and allowed to spontaneously anneal for 30 min while cooling to room temperature. After annealing, the oligonucleotides were blunted and the insert was ligated into the dephosphorylated SmaI-digested pLG-RasF1 vector. The cultivation period of each transformant mycelium for RNAi-1, RNAi-2, RNAi-18, and RNAi-19, including Le-Dd10-3, Le-Dd10-5, M252, and H600 as a control, was divided into 90, 120, and 150 days. The average number of days required for fruiting body formation was measured with three cultivation pots for each category.
Construction of the GST:Le-Dd10 fusion protein expression vector and preparation of a polyclonal antibody against Le-Dd10 products
To prepare GST:Le-Dd10, Le-Dd10 cDNA fragments were prepared with the primers GSTLeDd10F and GSTLeDd10R (Table 1), digested with BamHI and EcoRI, and inserted into the BamHI and EcoRI site of pGEX-2 T, a GST fusion protein expression vector (GM Healthcare). After transforming into Escherichia coli BL21-Gold (DE3) cells (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), transformants were incubated with 0.5 mM IPTG. GST:Le-Dd10 fusion proteins were adequately expressed at 37 °C for 16 h. The GST:Le-Dd10 was cut out from a 10% gel of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). A 50-kDa target band was formed from the 26 kDa of GST and 24 kDa of Le-Dd10 protein. Gel slices from cells incubated at 37 °C for 16 h were stirred in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.1) containing 0.1% SDS, 5% β -mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at room temperature overnight. They were then suspended in PBS and subcutaneously and intraperitoneally injected into male rabbits to prepare the polyclonal antibody as previously described (Yoshida 1987). Four injections were performed at intervals of 10 days and rabbits were bled to death 1 week after the last injection. As control serum, sera were withdrawn from rabbits before the first injection.
Western blotting analysis of the Le-Dd10 product
Lentinula edodes mycelia, primordia, fruiting body stipe, and pileus were separately suspended in PBS, and sonicated at level 4 for 30 s three times at intervals of 30 s with a Branson sonifier 250 (Branson Ultrasonics, CT, USA). They were mixed with the same volume of 2X SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiled in a water bath for 5 min. They were then applied to a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel following a standard method (Laemmli 1970) with a slight modification. After electrophoresis, SDS-PAGE gels were transferred to a PVDF membrane (Atto, Tokyo, Japan). The membrane was incubated with a polyclonal antibody against GST:Le-Dd10 fusion proteins diluted 1:1000 as the primary antibody, and then with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Organon Teknika Corp., NC, USA) diluted 1:500 as the secondary antibody. Western blotting analysis using the polyclonal antibody against GST:Le-Dd10 fusion proteins revealed a 50-kDa major single band of fusion proteins. No signals were observed using control serum.
PCR amplification for SSCP analysis
PCR amplification was used to detect polymorphisms by designing specific primers and amplifying fragments for SSCP analysis. Each reaction mixture consisted of 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.5, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.16 mM each dNTP, 0.08 μM each primer, 5 ng of genomic DNA, and 0.25 units of Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The total volume of each reaction mixture was 12.5 μL, which was overlaid with mineral oil. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 30 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 90 s, and 72 °C for 120 s, followed by 10-min incubation at 72 °C and subsequent cooling to 4 °C (PE480 thermal cycler; Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA).
Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis
Biotin-labeled PCR products were diluted 50- to 100-fold in 1 X TBE buffer (89 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 89 mM boric acid, and 2 mM EDTA), 6% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.33% tartrazine. Double-stranded DNA in a diluted solution was denatured and maintained at 96 °C for 5 min, and then the mixture was cooled on ice. The mixture was subsequently loaded on a 15 × 40-cm vertical 5% Hydro-Link Long acrylamide gel (BMA, Maine, USA) in 1 X TBE buffer and subjected to electrophoresis at 14 °C for 90 min at 30 W. DNA samples were transferred to a nylon transfer membrane (MSI, MA, USA) and visualized using a Phototope-Star Detection Kit (New England Biolabs, MA, USA).
Results and discussion
Isolation of Lentinula edodes cDNA clones
We aimed to isolate genes involved in the fruiting body formation of Lentinula edodes. However, there were some difficulties in this project: the long cultural period of L. edodes and confirmation of fruiting body formation in laboratory culture systems. Therefore, at the first step, we attempted to use Dictyostelium discoideum cDNA, which are able to form fruiting bodies in 24 h, as probes to isolate the target genes involved in fruiting body formation from L. edodes cells. Knockout constructs for the 45 D. discoideum cDNA clones, whose transcripts were specifically expressed in D. discoideum prestalks, were prepared as described in Materials and Methods. Among the 45 knockout mutants, mutants for three cDNA clones, namely, SSJ301 (Accession No. AJ488770) encoding oxysterol-binding protein, SSJ337 (Accession No. AF161253) encoding protein phosphatase 4, and SSK864 (Accession No. AF140044) encoding calmodulin-binding protein, exhibited aberrant fruiting bodies; SSJ301, a fruiting body with a tiny sorus; SSJ337, a fruiting body with an abnormal stalk; SSK864, a tiny fruiting body (Fig. 1; Takamoto et al. 2001; Kamei et al 2003, 2013). The L. edodes primordia cDNA library was screened using 32P-labeled SSJ301, SSJ337, and SSK864 cDNA as a probe. As a result, 21 cDNA clones, Le-Dd1–21, were isolated, and the properties of each cDNA clone are summarized in Table 2.
Lentinula edodes genes involved in fruiting body formation
Among 21 L. edodes cDNAs, the 10 cDNAs, Le-Dd5, Le-Dd6, Le-Dd7, Le-Dd9, Le-Dd10, Le-Dd11, Le-Dd12, Le-Dd13, Le-Dd14, and Le-Dd18, which had the 5’-terminal end, except for Le-Dd8, were inserted into the pLG-RasF1 vector with hph (hygromycin resistance gene) as described in the Materials and Methods. Le-Dd8 and Le-Dd13 cDNAs were a known gene, hydrophobin 1. The expression vector of each cDNA, pLG-RasF1/ Le-Dd5, pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd6, pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd7, pLG-RasF1/ Le-Dd9, pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd10, pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd11, pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd12, pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd13, pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd14, and pLG-RasF1/Le-Dd18, was constructed (Hamada et al. 2008). Transformation of L. edodes protoplasts was performed by the REMI method. Transformant colonies were screened, isolated, and grown on MYPG agar medium. Furthermore, they were cultured on block medium (Castanopsis sawdust medium) to reach a fruiting body stage. The cultivation period of L. edodes mycelia was divided into 90, 120, and 150 days and cultivation was carried out as described in Materials and Methods. The growth rate of mycelia was measured. As a result, no differences in the growth rate were observed among each transformant, including Hokken 600 (H600) and Mori 252 (M252). Representative clone results (Le-Dd10, Le-Dd11, Le-Dd14, and Le-Dd18) of Southern blotting analysis of each transformant mycelium are shown in Fig. 2. New bands not found in M252 as a control were detected in four clones, showing successful transformation. In the other clones (Le-Dd5, Le-Dd6, Le-Dd7, Le-Dd9, Le-Dd12, and Le-Dd13), new bands were also identified by Southern blotting analysis. The results of Northern blotting analysis for each transformant mycelium are shown in Fig. 3. Different transcripts were found among each clone. In transcripts of each transformant clone of Le-Dd5, Le-Dd7, Le-Dd9, and Le-Dd14, no significant differences were observed among transformant clones, including M252 as a control. However, high and low transcripts were detected in each transformant clone of Le-Dd6, Le-Dd10, Le-Dd11, Le-Dd12, Le-Dd13, and Le-Dd18. These results exclude the possibility of contamination with another clone or strain, including H600 or M252. If contamination occurs in transformants, different types of transcripts do not appear among each clone.
When each culture period reached 90, 120, or 150 days, culture was continued under 90% humidity and light irradiation at 15 °C to promote fruiting body formation after treatment as described in Materials and Methods. The number of days required for fruiting body formation after low-temperature treatment was measured (Table 3). The period to reach fruiting body formation for the Le-Dd10 cDNA overexpression clone (clones 10#3 ~ 10#6) was shorter than that for the other overexpression clones (Table 3), irrespective of the mRNA level of Le-Dd10 in mycelia (Fig. 3). Regarding the Le-Dd18 cDNA overexpression clone, the period to reach fruiting body formation differed between clone 18#4 and clone 18#6, showing different insertion states in genomic DNA between the two clones (Fig. 2). The overexpression vector including each cDNA as an insert was introduced into the protoplast cells from M252, which was unable to form fruiting bodies in fungal bed cultivation (block medium of Castanopsis sawdust), and was only able to form fruiting bodies in timber cultivation. On the other hand, H600 formed fruiting bodies in fungal bed cultivation. Therefore, the period to reach fruiting body formation for each overexpression clone of Le-Dd10 cDNA was shorter than that for the other overexpression clones or almost the same time as H600, the positive control, suggesting that Le-Dd10 products have properties that stimulate fruiting body formation.
Next, we prepared the RNAi vector for Le-Dd10 with the intron 2 region of Lcc1 as described in Materials and Methods. The results of Northern blotting analysis of transformants with the RNAi vector for Le-Dd10 are shown in Fig. 4. In these transformants, no significant differences were observed in the growth rate among each transformant mycelium, including H600 and M252, and the property to stimulate fruiting body formation in Le-Dd10 was not detected in each transformant for RNAi-1, RNAi-2, RNAi-18, or RNAi-19 under the culture conditions described in the Materials and Methods.
Mapping of Le-Dd10 on the linkage of Lentinula edodes
Mapping of the Le-Dd10 gene was performed by tetrad analysis, PCR amplification, and single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis, as reported previously (Miyazaki and Neda 2004; Miyazaki et al. 2014). PCR amplification and SSCP analysis revealed that the Le-Dd10 gene was mapped to linkage group LG4 among 11 linkage groups (Fig. 5). Both genes of recQ (Katsukawa and Shishido 2005) and mfbA (Yasuda and Shishido 1999) were located on LG4. They were transcribed in fruiting bodies during L. edodes development.
Analysis of Le-Dd10 products by Western blotting analysis
To prepare GST:Le-Dd10, a GST-Le-Dd10 fusion protein expression vector was constructed and GST:Le-Dd10 was isolated as described in Materials and Methods. After transforming into Escherichia coli BL21-Gold (DE3) cells, transformants were incubated with 0.5 mM IPTG at 25 °C or 37 °C for 5, 10, 16 h. GST:Le-Dd10 fusion proteins were adequately expressed at 37 °C for 16 h. The GST:Le-Dd10 was cut out from a 10% gel of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). A 50-kDa target band was formed from the 26 kDa of GST and 24 kDa of Le-Dd10 protein (Fig. 6). Most GST:Le-Dd10 became insoluble in culture conditions of E. coli BL21-Gold cells, even at a lower temperature of 18 °C. Therefore, solubilization of GST:Le-Dd10 was attempted using 0.1% TritonX-100, Tween20, CHAPS, and other detergents. Only SDS of higher than 0.1% was effective for the solubilization of GST:Le-Dd10, but GST:Le-Dd10 solubilized with SDS did not bind the GST affinity column. The GST:Le-Dd10 fusion proteins as an antigen for producing the polyclonal antibody were prepared by cutting and extracting the 50-kDa target bands from E. coli BL21-Gold cells incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. Western blotting analysis using the polyclonal antibody against GST:Le-Dd10 revealed that the molecular weight band of 56 kDa was observed in primordial and fruiting body stages of H600, and that major bands of 27 kDa and 14 kDa were observed in primordial and fruiting body stages of H600. On the other hand, the major bands of 56, 31, 24, and 14 kDa were observed in the mycelial stage of H600 (Fig. 7), with the Le-Dd10 transcript being detected in M252 mycelia (Fig. 3). The function of the Le-Dd10 protein expressed in the mycelial stage may be different from that in the primordial and fruiting body stages, suggesting that the Le-Dd10 product is a bifunctional protein.
The expected molecular weight of the Le-Dd10 product is 50 kDa based on the total amino acid sequence. However, the band position on SDS-PAGE was 56 kDa. The Le-Dd10 product had three predicted sites for N-linked sugar chains, and many predicted sites for O-linked sugar chains and phosphorylation. The differences between the expected molecular weight and that observed on SDS-PAGE may be due to the modification of sugar chains or other modifications, including phosphorylation. The Le-Dd10 protein has a Spt2 domain with a helix-turn-helix, similar to a DNA-binding protein (Hershkovits et al. 2006; Nourani et al. 2006). The Spt2 domain is located at the C-terminal site of the Le-Dd10 protein. Among the three predicted sites for N-linked sugar chains, one is near the Spt2 domain and two are within the domain. More than two-thirds of the total predicted sites for O-linked sugar chains and phosphorylation exist at the C-terminal site of the Le-Dd10 product. Thus, the Le-Dd10 protein may function as a transcription factor in fruiting body formation, suggesting that the DNA-binding activity of Le-Dd10 protein is regulated by the Spt2 domain, and reciprocal modifications of sugar and phosphorylation (Hart et al. 2007).
The relationship among the 56-kDa, 27-kDa, and 14-kDa proteins in primordial and fruiting body stages is unknown. However, for the Le-Dd10 protein, the change from 56 to 14 kDa may be important for the stimulation of fruiting body formation. Using different varieties of L. edodes, XR-1, KS11, KA1001, H600, H607, and H715, Western blotting analysis was carried out. Among them, the varieties with shorter culture periods to form fruiting bodies had strong expression of the 14-kDa protein in the primordial or fruiting body stage. Previous findings demonstrated that the modification of a transcription factor changed its activity (Klenova et al. 1997; Tootle and Rebay 2005). Therefore, it is conceivable that the 14-kDa protein may be produced from a 56-kDa protein through protease digestion.
References
Arima T, Yamamoto M, Hirata A, Kawane S, Kamada T (2004) The eln3 gene involved in fruiting body morphogenesis of Coprinus cinereus encodes a putative membrane protein with a general glycosyltransferase domain. Fungal Genet Biol 41:805–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2004.04.003
Fujimoto Y, Nakagawa T, Tanesaka E, Yoshida M (2004) Construction of Lentinula edodes expression vector and the expression system. Kinki J Crop Sci Breed 49:9–11
Hamada S, Tanesaka E, Yoshida M (2008) Functional analysis of genes involved in fruit-body formation of Lentinula edodes. J Crop Res 53:67–73
Hart GW, Housley MP, Slawson C (2007) Cycling of O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine on nucleocytoplasmic proteins. Nature 446:1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05815
Hershkovits G, Bangio H, Cohen R, Katcoff DJ (2006) Recruitment of mRNA cleavage/polyadenylation machinery by the yeast chromatin protein Sin1p/Spt2p. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9808–9813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602014103
Hori K, Kajiwara S, Saito T, Miyazawa H, Katayose Y, Shishido K (1991) Cloning, sequence analysis and transcriptional expression of a ras gene of the edible basidiomycete Lentinus edodes. Gene 105:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(91)90517-F
Kamei I, Tanesaka E, Yoshida M (2003) Isolation and characterization of genes involved in fruiting-body formation of Lentinula edodes. Kinki J Crop Sci Breed 48:35–39
Kamei I, Takamoto K, Sakuragi N, Tanesaka E, Yoshida M (2013) Protein phosphatase 4 is involved in the late development of Dictyostelium discoideum. Open J Mol Int Physiol 3:49–53. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmip.2013.32008
Katsukawa S, Shishido K (2005) Analysis of recQ gene transcript in fruiting bodies of basidiomycetous mushroom Lentinula edodes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:2247–2249. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.69.2247
Klenova EM, Nicolas RH, Sally U, Carne AF, Lee RE, Lobanenkov VV, Goodwin GH (1997) Molecular weight abnormalities of the CTCF transcription factor: CTCF migrates aberrantly in SDS-PAGE and the size of the expressed protein is affected by the UTRs and sequences within the coding region of the CTCF gene. Nucleic Acids Res 25:466–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.3.466
Kües U (2000) Life History and Developmental Processes in the Basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:316–353. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.64.2.316-353.2000
Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
Miyazaki K, Neda H (2004) Evaluation of the use of outbred lines for screening of genetic markers in Shiitake (Lentinula edodes). Breed Sci 54:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.54.75
Miyazaki Y, Sakuragi Y, Yamazaki T, Shishido K (2004) Target genes of the developmental regulator PRIB of the mushroom Lentinula edodes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68:1898–1905. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.68.1898
Miyazaki K, Sakamoto Y, Kaneko S, Miyazaki Y, Shiraishi S (2014) Centromere mapping on the linkage map of Lentinula edodes with tetrad analyses. Breed Res 16:13–15. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbr.16.13
Miyazaki Y, Kaneko S, Sunagawa M, Shishido K, Yamazaki T, Nakamura M, Babasaki K (2007) The fruiting-specific Le.flp1 gene, encoding a novel fungal fasciclin-like protein, of the basidiomycetous mushroom Lentinula edodes. Current Genet 51: 367–375 https://agriknowledge.affrc.go.jp/RN/3020062884
Morio T, Urushihara H, Saito T, Ugawa Y, Mizuno H, Yoshida M, Yoshino R, Mitra BN, Pi M, Sato T, Takemoto K, Yasukawa H, Williams J, Maeda M, Takeuchi I, Ochiai H, Tanaka Y (1998) The Dictyostelium developmental cDNA project: Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from the first-finger stages of development. DNA Res 5:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/5.6.335
Muraguchi H, Fujita T, Kishibe Y, Konno K, Ueda N, Nakahori K, Yanagi S, Kamada T (2008) The exp1 gene essential for pileus expansion and autolysis of the inky cap mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus) encodes an HMG protein. Fungal Genet Biol 45:890–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2007.11.004
Nakade N, Watanabe H, Sakamoto Y, Sato T (2011) Gene silenscing of the Lentinula edode lcc1 gene by expression of a homologous inverted repeat sequence. Microbiol Res 166:484–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2010.09.004
Nourani A, Robert F, Winston F (2006) Evidence that Spt2/Sin1, an HMG-like factor, plays roles in transcription elongation, chromatin structure, and genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cel Biol 26:1496–1509. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.4.1496-1509.2006
Palmer GE, Horton JS (2006) Mushrooms by magic: making connections between signal transductionand fruiting body development in the basidiomycete fungus Schizophyllum commune. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00341.x
Sakuragi N, Ogasawara N, Tanesaka E, Yoshida M (2005) Functional analysis of a novel gene, DD3-3, from Dictyostelium discoideum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 331:1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.244
Sato T, Yaegashi K, Ishii S, Hirano T, Kajiwara S, Shishido K, Enei H (1998) Transformation of the edible basidiomycete Lentinus edodes by restriction enzyme-mediated integration of plasmid DNA. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 62:2346–2350. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.62.2346
Srivilai P, Chaisaena W, Kües U (2006) Genetic analysis of Coprinopsis cinerea mutants with defects in fruiting body development. In AG Pisabarro and L Ramirez (Eds.), VI Genetics and Cellular Biology of Basidiomycetes (pp. 177–190). Pamplona: Universida Püblica de Navarra. https://www.researchgate.nrt/publication/262186990
Sutoh K (1993) A transformation vector for Dictyostelium discoideum with a new selectable marker bsr. Plasmid 30:150–154. https://doi.org/10.1006/plas.1993.1042
Takamoto K, Ootaki T, Yoshida M (2001) Identification of genes involved in fruiting-body formation of Dictyostelium discoideum. Bull Inst Compr Agr Sci Kinki Univ 9:123–127
Tootle TL, Rebay I (2005) Post-translational modifications influence transcription factor activity: a view from the ETS superfamily. BioEssays 27:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20198
Yasuda T, Shishido K (1999) Analysis of mfbA alleles of the eubasidio- mycete Lentinus edodes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63:2228–2231. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.63.2228
Yoshida M (1987) Identification of carbohydrate moieties involved in EDTA- stable or EDTA-sensitive cell contact of Dictyostelium. J Biochem 101:1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a121987
Yoshida M, Ishida S, Iizuka Y (1991) Mutants of Dictyostelium discoideum with altered carbohydrate moieties of contact site A. Cell Struct Funct 16:383–390. https://doi.org/10.1247//csf.16.383
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Y. Miyazaki (Department of Applied Microbiology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute) and Dr. Y. Sakamoto (Iwate Biotechnology Research Center) for their helpful discussion on our study, and Mr. H. Nakatsuka, Ms. T. Tanaka, and Mr. R. Arahori (Department of Agricultural Science, Kinki University) for their technical assistance. One of authors (M. Yoshida) was a member of the “Dictyostelium cDNA project team in Japan”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. All experiments performed in this study complied with the current laws of Japan.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The nucleotide sequence reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ, EMBL, and GenBank under Accession No. AB679316.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kishikawa, A., Hamada, S., Kamei, I. et al. A novel gene, Le-Dd10, is involved in fruiting body formation of Lentinula edodes. Arch Microbiol 204, 602 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03206-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03206-z