Abstract
Candidatus Branchiomonas cysticola is an intracellular, gram-negative Betaproteobacteria causing epitheliocystis in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). The bacterium has not been genetically characterized at the intraspecific level despite its high prevalence among salmon suffering from gill disease in Norwegian aquaculture. DNA from gill samples of Atlantic salmon PCR positive for Cand. B. cysticola and displaying pathological signs of gill disease, was, therefore, extracted and subject to next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Partial sequences of four housekeeping (HK) genes (aceE, lepA, rplB, rpoC) were ultimately identified from the sequenced material. Assays for real-time RT-PCR and fluorescence in-situ hybridization, targeting the newly acquired genes, were simultaneously applied with existing assays targeting the previously characterized 16S rRNA gene. Agreement in both expression and specificity between these putative HK genes and the 16S gene was observed in all instances, indicating that the partial sequences of these HK genes originate from Cand. B. cysticola. The knowledge generated from the present study constitutes a major prerequisite for the future design of novel genotyping schemes for this bacterium.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gill diseases (GD) represent an ever-increasing health related as well as purely economic issue in Norwegian aquaculture. It is a multifactorial disease that contributes to considerable mortality of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) annually in Norway (Kvellestad et al. 2005; Steinum et al. 2009, 2010a; Nylund et al. 2011). Epitheliocystis represents one of the most prevalent conditions associated with GD in farmed Atlantic salmon (Nylund et al. 1998, 2015; Draghi et al. 2004; Gjessing et al. 2021) and has been reported from over 90 different fish species worldwide (Bradley et al. 1988; Meijer et al. 2006; Nowak and LaPatra 2006; Horn 2008; Karlsen et al. 2008; Polkinghorne et al. 2010; Schmidt-Posthaus et al. 2012; Steigen et al. 2013; Fehr et al. 2013; Stride and Nowak 2014). Epitheliocystis in farmed salmon is characterized by intracytoplasmic, intravacuolar, inclusions containing gram-negative bacteria belonging to Chlamydiales, primarily found in epithelial cells lining the secondary lamella of the gills (Nylund et al. 1998) (Draghi et al. 2004; Nowak and LaPatra 2006; Horn 2008; Karlsen et al. 2008; Gunnarsson et al. 2017). One exception is the betaproteobacterium Candidatus Branchiomonas cysticola, that also causes epitheliocystis in salmon (Toenshoff et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2013). Following its first description, Cand. B. cysticola has since been described as the most prevalent bacterial agent in salmon displaying pathological signs of epitheliocystis (Steinum et al. 2010b; Toenshoff et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2013).
Cand. B. cysticola has yet to be genetically characterized beyond the 16S rRNA gene (Toenshoff et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2013). This is mainly due to the obligate intracellular nature of the bacterium and the lack of in vitro/in vivo cultivation systems. The latter complicates the development of genotyping schemes for this bacterial agent. Sequencing of novel microorganisms have during recent years been heavily dependent on homogenous cultures of the respective agents (Lasken and McLean 2014). One exception is the epitheliocystis agent Candidatus Syngnamydia salmonis that can be cultured in Paramoeba perurans which made it possible to obtain a large part of the genome of this member of Chlamydiales (Nylund et al. 2018b). Culture-independent methods such as next-generation sequencing (mNGS) have thus been increasingly applied to uncover the full and/or partial genomes of novel pathogenic microorganisms associated with diseases in fish (Tengs and Rimstad 2017; Skoge et al. 2018; Sandlund et al. 2021).
In the present study, identification of housekeeping (HK) genes from Cand. B. cysticola was conducted using material for next generation sequencing (NGS) technology. The unculturable nature of this bacterium also required in situ hybridization for visualization of the spatial expression for the newly acquired genes, confirming their association with the epitheliocysts. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on fixed gill tissue was, therefore, performed by simultaneous application of a Cand. B. cysticola-specific oligonucleotide probe (Toenshoff et al. 2012) and newly designed probes targeting putative HK genes.
The characterization of novel Cand. B. cysticola-specific sequences enables the development of genotyping schemes for phylogenetic reconstruction of the bacterium’s population structure. A multilocus phylogenetic analysis (MLPA) scheme, comprising newly identified genes, could provide valuable knowledge of epidemiologic relevance for the prevention of gill diseases in Norwegian aquaculture. Elucidation of the bacterium’s population structure represents a major prerequisite to acquire new diagnostic tools, identify strains of varying virulence, and to develop possible future vaccines. In the present study we established a proof of concept for sequencing and identification of Cand. B. cysticola HK genes through mNGS and FISH, enabling the future phylogenetic characterization of this bacterium.
Materials and methods
Sample processing and analysis
Lethargic Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) displaying increased ventilation rate, pale and mottled gills were sampled by collecting the left-side second gill arch. Each gill sample was preserved frozen on dry ice for subsequent DNA/RNA extraction and in 4% buffered formaldehyde solution for histological analysis. DNA was extracted from Cand. B. cysticola-positive gills using the E.Z.N.A® Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, USA) in accordance with the manufacturers protocol. RNA was extracted using the protocol for Isol-RNA Lysis Reagent as described by Gunnarsson et al. (2017). Relative quantification of Cand. B. cysticola and associated gill pathogens (Cand. Piscichlamydia salmonis, Cand. Syngnamydia salmonis, Paramoeba perurans) present in the gill tissues were performed using real-time RT-PCR (Table 1). Two samples (g4 and g42) were selected based on this relative quantification. The eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1AA, Table 1) from salmon (Olsvik et al. 2005) was used as a control of the RNA amount, and a good extraction was expected to give a Ct-value around 15 (the cycle threshold was set to 0.1).
The integrity of total DNA extracted was assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. High molecular weight DNA (> 5 Kb) was subsequently extracted from the gel of sample g4 and further purified using the E.Z.N.A® Gel Extraction Kit according to the manufacturers protocol. Total DNA irrespective of molecular weight was preserved from sample g42 for downstream application. Total DNA quantities were assessed by UV–Vis Spectrometry using the Nanodrop® ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA), while relative quantification of target and host DNA was performed using real-time PCR (Table 1).
NGS sequencing and gene mining
Two samples, each containing five micrograms of purified DNA were sent to the Genomics Core Facility (GCF) at Haukeland University Hospital (Bergen, Norway) for shotgun sequencing. The NGS library was prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) with a target insert size of 300 bp paired end reads. The final prepped samples were sequenced through a 600-cycle flow cell using the Illumina NextSeq 4000.
Cutadapt v3.4 (Martin 2011) was used to remove sequencing adapters and bases below a Phred quality score of 30. To remove the host contamination the cleaned reads were aligned to Salmon salar whole genome (GCF_000233375.1) downloaded from NCBI GenBank using bowtie2 v2.2.9. (Langmead and Salzberg 2012). The aligned reads were removed, while unaligned reads were further cleaned using Trimmomatic v0.39. (Bolger et al. 2014). De-novo assembly of trimmed sequence reads was performed using SPAdes genome assembly algorithm (Bankevich et al. 2012). Quality of the obtained assembly was assessed with Quast v5.0.2 (Mikheenko et al. 2018). This whole genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JAKNSC000000000. The version described in this paper is version JAKNSC010000000.
Finally assembled scaffold sequences were imported into Geneious Prime (2021), where a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) database was generated comprising all contigs assembled. The annotated genome of Taylorella aquigenitalis (Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Alcaligenaceae; Taylorella) was imported from NCBI GenBank (NZ_CP021060.1) as a putative reference genome and subsequently aligned against the local BLAST database. Four homologous sequences that aligned with annotated housekeeping (HK) genes of T. aquigenitalis (aceE, lepA, rplB and rpoC) were extracted and subject to primer/probe design for real-time RT-PCR (Table 1) and FISH (Table 2). Real-time RT-PCR was performed on RNA from previously obtained gill samples proven positive (n = 5) and negative (n = 5) for Cand. B. cysticola, for determining the efficiency and specificity of the assays.
Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)
Pretreatment of gill sections
Fixed gill arches were paraffin embedded by Pharmaq Analytiq (Bergen, Norway). Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) gill samples were sectioned at 5 μm thick using a RNAse treated microtome and diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) water for processing. The sections were deposited onto SuperFrost® Plus slides (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA) and dried at 58 ℃ for 20 min before being deparaffinized by three baths of xylene for 5 min. The sections were rehydrated through successive baths of declining ethanol concentrations in DEPC water (2 × 100%, 95%, 70% and 50% ethanol) for 1 min each. Irreversible inactivation of endogenous RNAses was achieved by exposing the sections to 0.1% of active DEPC in PBS for 12 min at room temperature (RT) (Pernthaler and Amann 2004). The slides were subsequently immersed in 2 × saline sodium citrate buffer solution (SSC) for 2 × 1 min. Protein digestion enabling intracellular/intravacuolar probe penetration was performed by incubating the slides in 0.7 μg proteinase K (2 mg/mL) (from Tritirachium album; ≥ 30 units/mg protein; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in 0.1 M Tris–HCl and 50 mM EDTA (pH8) for 15 min at 37 ℃ (Toenshoff et al. 2012). Slides were washed in 2 × SSC for 2 × 5 min and dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations in DEPC water (50%, 70%, 95% and 2 × 100% EtOH) for 1 min each. The slides were finally air dried for ≥ 1 h at RT before the sections were circled using a hydrophobic marker pen.
FISH of mRNA
1 mL of hybridization buffer; 900 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH8, 35% deionized formamide, 0.01% SDS in DEPC, was prepared in a RNAse free 1.5 mL microtube. Aliquots of 180 μl hybridization buffer were made for each section. 2 μl of oligo probes labeled with Cyanine 3 (Cy3) targeting the individual housekeeping genes (40 ng/μl) were added to separate aliquots of hybridization buffer together with 2 μl of oligo probe BraCy-129 (40 ng/μl) labeled with Cyanine 5 (Cy5) (Table 2). The final volume of hybridization solution containing the two probes was then deposited onto separate tissue sections. The slides were placed within an airtight humidity chamber containing Whatman paper soaked in 2 × SSC and incubated at 46 ℃ for 2 h. Following hybridization, the slides were transferred to 50 mL of wash buffer; 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 70 mM NaCl, 50 mM EDTA, 0.01% SDS in Milli-Q water and incubated at 48 ℃. The slides were finally immersed in 4 ℃ Milli-Q water for a couple of seconds before being air-dried at RT with minimal light exposure. Dried slides were mounted in Fluoroshield™ histology mounting medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and images were captured using the Leica AF6000 fluorescence imaging system. Sequential and simultaneous processing of images was performed using the Leica Application Suite X (version 3.7.4) imaging software.
Results
Histological analyses of sampled gills showed common pathological signs of GD including circulatory disturbances, hyperplastic/hypertrophic epithelial cells, inflammation and necrosis, as well as numerous intracellular inclusions of bacteria accordant with epitheliocystis (Fig. 1). Real-time RT-PCR on RNA extracted from samples g4 and g42 targeting Cand. B. cysticola 16S rRNA/ salmon EF1AA resulted in Ct-values of 8.9/14.3 and 7.3/12.0, for these two samples, respectively. These values indicate high levels of Cand. B. cysticola suggesting that the observed epitheliocysts seen in the gill tissues could be caused by this bacterium.
NGS and gene mining
Illumina sequencing of extracted DNA produced 2.7 million and 4.2 million paired end reads from samples g4 and g42 following host contaminant removal and sequence clean-up. Assembly of finally processed reads generated 350 and 2803 contigs for these samples, respectively.
NCBI GenBank nucleotide BLAST search (BLASTn) enabled identification of putative Cand. B. cysticola specific sequences from the assembled scaffold sequences. A contig of 1541 bps was retrieved (OL314810) demonstrating 99.93% nucleotide identity and 100% query cover with the partial 16S rRNA gene sequence deposited by Toenshoff et al. (2012) (JN968376.1). Alignment of the putative reference genome of Taylorella equigenitalis using the custom BLAST database of assembled scaffolds resulted in 68 hits and the extraction of four sequences homologous to annotated HK genes (aceE, lepA, rplB, rpoC) of T. aquigenitalis.
Real-time RT-PCR
Real-time RT-PCR on RNA from previously obtained gill samples, generated amplicons for all loci when assays targeting the newly acquired HK genes (Table 1) were applied, showing the presence of these in the Cand. B. cysticola-positive RNA. No amplicons were detected among negative samples (Table 3). The results also demonstrated consistent expression levels of all four genes (aceE, lepA, rplB, rpoC) though at significantly higher Ct-values compared to the ‘Epit’ assay targeting 16S rRNA (Table 3).
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
Simultaneous application of oligonucleotide probe BraCy-129 with aceE, lepA, rplB, or rpoC all produced strong fluorescent signals in dense intracellular inclusions resembling the morphology of epitheliocysts (Fig. 2). Sequential visualization of the separate fluorophores (Cy3/Cy5) showed that the fluorescent signals originated from identical structures of the gill (Fig. 2A, B). The co-localizing hybridization of BraCy-129 and probes targeting putative Cand. B. cysticola HK genes are further demonstrated by the combined fluorescent signal from both fluorophores (Fig. 2C). The BraCy-129 (Cy5, yellow) probe produced a higher level of emission compared to the Cy3-labelled probes (red) producing a yellow/orange colour when these images were superimposed (Fig. 2C).
Discussion
Candidatus Branchiomonas cysticola has not been genetically characterized beyond the 16S rRNA gene since its first description associated with epitheliocystis in Atlantic salmon (Toenshoff et al. 2012). The design of a FISH probe (Bracy-129) that was shown to be specific to Cand. B. cysticola from a background of co-infective agents (e.g., Candidatus Piscichlamydia salmonis) (Toenshoff et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2013), has now enabled the identification of several HK Cand. B. cysticola genes. Through simultaneous application of ‘BraCy-129’ and FISH probes targeting the loci of putative Cand. B. cysticola HK genes acquired by mNGS, we have established a proof of concept for the characterization HK genes specific to this bacterium.
Examining the gills sampled from lethargic salmon displaying clinical signs of GD showed typical histopathological changes associated with epitheliocystis (Fig. 1). When studying the cysts at 100 × magnification using a light microscope, a resemblance in morphology was observed consistent with previous descriptions of epitheliocysts in Atlantic salmon (Fig. 1B)(Nylund et al. 1998, 2015; Draghi et al. 2004; Karlsen et al. 2008; Toenshoff et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2013).
Real-time RT-PCR on total RNA isolated from samples g4 and g42 showed an abundance of Cand. B. cysticola. Additional RT-PCR analyses screening for closely associated Chlamydiales (Draghi et al. 2004; Nylund et al. 2015) as well as Paramoeba perurans (Table 1), revealed moderate amounts of Cand. S. salmonis, though no detection of Cand. P. salmonis. The levels of Cand. S. salmonis can, however, appear misleading when designating an etiological agent as it often coincides with the presence of Paramoeba perurans. Cand. S. salmonis has previously been found to be present in the majority, but not exclusively within this amoeba and it may also be present in epitheliocysts on the salmon gills (Nylund et al. 2015). Due to the moderate/high amounts of P. perurans present in the samples subjected to RT-PCR, detection of Cand. S. salmonis is partly attributed to the presence of amoeba and is thus not considered to be the primary agent in causing the abundance of cysts observed by histopathology (Fig. 1). Therefore, Cand. B. cysticola was considered the most probable etiological agent in the development of epitheliocystis. This is in agreement with previous studies on agent prevalence and pathology from salmon displaying epitheliocystis associated with associated with GD (Toenshoff et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2013; Gjessing et al. 2021).
BLASTn searches of final assembled NGS contigs enabled the identification of Cand. B. cysticola specific RNA operons (OL314810), as well as putative reference genomes for local BLAST alignments within Geneious Prime. One such genome was that of Taylorella aquigenitalis (NZ_CP021060.1) which was chosen for the retrieval of putative HK genes due to its high BLASTn alignment score for contigs displaying similarity with betaproteobacteria of Burkholderiales.
RT-PCR on RNA from previously obtained gill samples applying assays of putative HK genes produced amplicons for all four genes (aceE, lepA, rplB, rpoC) among samples positive for Cand. B. cysticola (Table 3). Considering the lack of detected amplicons within samples proven negative for this bacterium, these results indicated that the assays were specific to Cand. B. cysticola. The invariable range in Ct-value of these assays also showed the uniform expression levels expected of most prokaryotic HK genes (Table 3). However, the Ct-values generated by these assays were higher compared to the ‘Epit’ assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene (Table 3). This was probably due to the highly expressed nature of 16S rRNA and the multiple rRNA operons (rrn) usually present within the genome of most bacteria (Klappenbach et al. 2001).
Fluorescence in-situ hybridization of mRNA using BraCy-129 produced a signal co-localised with structures displaying a similar size, form, and location (Fig. 2A) as the epitheliocysts recognized by histopathology (Fig. 1B). This observable specificity corresponds with previous applications of this probe describing the etiology of Cand. B. cysticola associated with epitheliocystis (Toenshoff et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2013). Simultaneous administration of oligo probes BraCy-129 with any of the HK genes; aceE/lepA/rplB/rpoC all showed identical specificity in spatial expression (Fig. 2A, B). The co-localization of mRNA targeted by these probes thus confirms that the newly acquired HK sequences originate from Cand. B. cysticola (Fig. 2C).
The observable differences in emission intensity from the separate probes also seems to correspond with the genetic expression levels revealed by RT-PCR. Overlay of the separate fluorophores (Fig. 2C) showed an increased level of emitted fluorescence from BraCy-129 compared to the probes of putative HK genes (Fig. 2C). As with the application of RT-PCR assays, this is to be expected due to the highly expressed nature and the putative multiple copies of the 16S rRNA gene being transcribed and subject to RNA hybridization. However, differences in quantum yield of these fluorophores or the specific sequences of these probes could also have contributed to the observed differences in intensity (Mujumdar et al. 1993; Kretschy et al. 2016).
Conclusions
The specificity demonstrated by RT-PCR assays and concordance in spatial expression of HK gene FISH probes and the previously reported 16S probe for Cand. B. cysticola confirms that these newly acquired HK sequences originate from Cand. B. cysticola. This information constitutes a major prerequisite for future phylogenetic studies of this bacterium’s population structure.
References
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D et al (2012) SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Bradley T, Newcomer C, Maxwell K (1988) Epitheliocystis associated with massive mortalities of cultured lake trout Saivelinus namaycush. Dis Aquat Organ 4:9–17. https://doi.org/10.3354/DAO004009
Draghi A, Popov VL, Kahl MM et al (2004) Characterization of ‘Candidatus Piscichlamydia salmonis’ (Order Chlamydiales), a chlamydia-like bacterium associated with epitheliocystis in farmed atlantic salmon (Salmo solar). J Clin Microbiol 42:5286–5297. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.11.5286-5297.2004
Fehr A, Walther E, Schmidt-Posthaus H et al (2013) Candidatus syngnamydia venezia, a novel member of the phylum chlamydiae from the broad nosed pipefish syngnathus typhle. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0070853
Geneious Prime (2021) https://www.geneious.com. Accessed 10 Oct 2021
Gjessing MC, Spilsberg B, Steinum TM et al (2021) Multi-agent in situ hybridization confirms Ca Branchiomonas cysticola as a major contributor in complex gill disease in Atlantic salmon. Fish Shellfish Immunol Rep 2:100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsirep.2021.100026
Gunnarsson GS, Karlsbakk E, Blindheim S et al (2017) Temporal changes in infections with some pathogens associated with gill disease in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Aquaculture 468:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.10.011
Horn M (2008) Chlamydiae as symbionts in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Microbiol 62:113–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.MICRO.62.081307.162818
Karlsen M, Nylund A, Watanabe K et al (2008) Characterization of ‘Candidatus Clavochlamydia salmonicola’: an intracellular bacterium infecting salmonid fish. Environ Microbiol 10:208–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1462-2920.2007.01445.X
Klappenbach JA, Saxman PR, Cole JR, Schmidt TM (2001) rrndb: the ribosomal RNA operon copy number database. Nucleic Acids Res 29:181. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/29.1.181
Kretschy N, Sack M, Somoza MM (2016) Sequence-dependent fluorescence of Cy3-and Cy5-labeled double-stranded DNA. Bioconjug Chem 27:840–848. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00053
Kvellestad A, Falk K, Nygaard SMR et al (2005) Atlantic salmon paramyxovirus (ASPV) infection contributes to proliferative gill inflammation (PGI) in seawater-reared Salmo salar. Dis Aquat Organ 67:47–54. https://doi.org/10.3354/DAO067047
Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
Lasken RS, McLean JS (2014) Recent advances in genomic DNA sequencing of microbial species from single cells. Nat Rev Genet 15:577. https://doi.org/10.1038/NRG3785
Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Embnet Journal 17:10. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Meijer A, Roholl PJM, Ossewaarde JM et al (2006) Molecular evidence for association of chlamydiales bacteria with epitheliocystis in leafy seadragon (Phycodurus eques), silver perch (Bidyanus bidyanus), and barramundi (Lates calcarifer). Appl Environ Microbiol 72:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.1.284-290.2006
Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V et al (2018) Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 34:i142–i150. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty266
Mitchell SO, Steinum TM, Toenshoff ER et al (2013) ‘Candidatus Branchiomonas cysticola’ is a common agent of epitheliocysts in seawater-farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in Norway and Ireland. Dis Aquat Organ 103:35–43. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02563
Mujumdar RB, Ernst LA, Mujumdar SR, Lewis CJ (1993) Cyanine dye labeling reagents: sulfoindocyanine succinimidyl esters. Bioconjug Chem 4:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc00020a001
Nowak BF, LaPatra SE (2006) Epitheliocystis in fish. J Fish Dis 29:573–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2761.2006.00747.X
Nylund A, Kvenseth AM, Isdal E (1998) A morphological study of the epitheliocystis agent in farmed Atlantic salmon. J Aquat Anim Health 10:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8667(1998)010%3c0043:AMSOTE%3e2.0.CO;2
Nylund A, Watanabe K, Nylund S et al (2008) Morphogenesis of salmonid gill poxvirus associated with proliferative gill disease in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway. Arch Virol 153:1299–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-008-0117-7
Nylund S, Andersen L, Saevareid I et al (2011) Diseases of farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar associated with infections by the microsporidian Paranucleospora theridion. Dis Aquat Organ 94:41–57. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02313
Nylund S, Steigen A, Karlsbakk E et al (2015) Characterization of ‘Candidatus Syngnamydia salmonis’ (Chlamydiales, Simkaniaceae), a bacterium associated with epitheliocystis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Arch Microbiol 197:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-1038-3
Nylund A, Hansen H, Brevik ØJ et al (2018a) 2018a) Infection dynamics and tissue tropism of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar. Parasites Vectors 111(11):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13071-017-2583-9
Nylund A, Pistone D, Trosse C et al (2018b) Genotyping of Candidatus Syngnamydia salmonis (chlamydiales; Simkaniaceae) co-cultured in Paramoeba perurans (amoebozoa; Paramoebidae). Arch Microbiol 200:859–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-018-1488-0
Olsvik PA, Lie KK, Jordal AE et al (2005) Evaluation of potential reference genes in real-time RT-PCR studies of Atlantic salmon. BMC Mol Biol 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-6-21
Pernthaler A, Amann R (2004) Simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization of mRNA and rRNA in environmental bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5426–5433. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5426-5433.2004
Polkinghorne A, Schmidt-Posthaus H, Meijer A et al (2010) Novel Chlamydiales associated with epitheliocystis in a leopard shark Triakis semifasciata. Dis Aquat Organ 91:75–81. https://doi.org/10.3354/DAO02255
Sandlund N, Rønneseth A, Ellul RM et al (2021) Pasteurella spp. Infections in Atlantic salmon and lumpsucker. J Fish Dis 44:1201–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFD.13381
Schmidt-Posthaus H, Polkinghorne A, Nufer L et al (2012) A natural freshwater origin for two chlamydial species, Candidatus Piscichlamydia salmonis and Candidatus Clavochlamydia salmonicola, causing mixed infections in wild brown trout (Salmo trutta). Environ Microbiol 14:2048–2057. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1462-2920.2011.02670.X
Skoge RH, Brattespe J, Økland AL et al (2018) New virus of the family Flaviviridae detected in lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus). Arch Virol 163:679–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00705-017-3643-3
Steigen A, Nylund A, Karlsbakk, et al (2013) ‘Cand. Actinochlamydia clariae’ gen. nov., sp. Nov., a unique intracellular bacterium causing epitheliocystis in catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Uganda. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0066840
Steinum T, Sjåstad K, Falk K et al (2009) An RT PCR-DGGE survey of gill-associated bacteria in Norwegian seawater-reared Atlantic salmon suffering proliferative gill inflammation. Aquaculture 293:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.05.006
Steinum T, Kvellestad A, Colquhoun DJ et al (2010a) Microbial and pathological findings in farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar with proliferative gill inflammation. Dis Aquat Organ 91:201–211. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02266
Stride MC, Nowak BF (2014) Epitheliocystis in three wild fish species in Tasmanian waters. J Fish Dis 37:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFD.12124
Tengs T, Rimstad E (2017) Emerging pathogens in the fish farming industry and sequencing-based pathogen discovery. Dev Comp Immunol 75:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2017.01.025
Toenshoff ER, Kvellestad A, Mitchell SO et al (2012) A novel betaproteobacterial agent of gill epitheliocystis in seawater farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). PLoS ONE 7:e32696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032696
Acknowledgements
The Genomics Core Facility (GCF) at the University of Bergen, which is a part of the NorSeq consortium, provided their sequencing services in the present study. GCF is supported in part by major grants from the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 245979/F50) and Trond Mohn Stiftelse (grant no. BFS2016-genom). Duncan J. Colquhoun and Jannicke Wiik-Nielsen at The Norwegian Veterinary Institute (As, Norway) provided valuable insights in previously applied Cand. B. cysticola FISH protocols. Pavinee Nimmongkol at the Fish Disease Research Group (FDRG, UiB) is also acknowledged for preparation of tissue sections for in situ hybridization.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Bergen (incl Haukeland University Hospital). This research was part of the Centre for Research-based innovations in Closed-containment Aquaculture, CtrlAQUA, and funded by the Research Council of Norway (Project 237856/O30).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mjølnerød, E.B., Srivastava, A., Moore, L.J. et al. Identification of housekeeping genes of Candidatus Branchiomonas cysticola associated with epitheliocystis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Arch Microbiol 204, 365 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-02966-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-02966-y