Skip to main content
Log in

Escherichia coli viability determination using dynamic light scattering: a comparison with standard methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the concentration of bacteria in a sample is important in the food industry, medicine and biotechnology. A disadvantage of the plate-counting method is that a microorganism colony could arise from one cell or from many cells. The other standard methodology, known as optical density determination, is based on the turbidity of a suspension and registers all bacteria, dead and alive. In this article, dynamic light scattering is proposed as a fast and reliable method to determine bacterial viability and, consequently, time evolution. Escherichia coli was selected because this microorganism is well known and easy to handle. A correlation between the data from these three techniques was obtained. We were able to calculate the growth rate, usually determined by plate counting or optical density measurement, using dynamic light scattering and to predict bacterial behavior. An analytical relationship between the colony forming units and the light scattered intensity was also deduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews RD, Tobolsky AV (1951) Elastoviscous properties of polyisobutylene. IV. Relaxation time spectrum and calculation of bulk viscosity. J Polym Sci 7:221–242. doi:10.1002/pol.1951.120070210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berne B, Pecor R (1976) Dynamic light scattering with applications to chemistry, biology and physics. John Wiley, New York (Particle size was determined by the model reported in sections 5.4 and 5.5. The total scattered intensity was obtained from the zero-time correlation function reported in section 8.4.)

  • Hiemenz PC, Lodge TP (2007) Polymer chemistry. Taylor and Francis Group, Florida, pp 486–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollas JM (2004) Modern spectroscopy. John Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingle JD, Crouch SR (1988) Spectro-chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J (2000) Brock biology of microorganisms. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rongzhi L (2000) Time-temperature superposition method for glass transition temperature of plastic materials. Mater Sci Eng A Struct 278:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struik LCE (1978) Physical aging in amorphous polymers and other materials. Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen IAM, Bernaerts K, Dens EJJ, Geeraerd AH, van Impe JF (2004) Predictive modeling of the microbial lag phase: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 94:137–159. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.01.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Gurp M, Palmen J (2007) Time-temperature superposition for polymeric blends. Rheol Bull 67:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitzewitz PW (1999) Glencoe physics. Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, New York, p 395

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank M. C. Arredondo, F. Fernández, U. Mora, R. Preza, A. L. Rodríguez and G. Vázquez for significant technical assistance. S. Arvizu and L. M. López are acknowledged for careful revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achim M. Loske.

Additional information

Communicated by Jorge Membrillo-Hernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loske, A.M., Tello, E.M., Vargas, S. et al. Escherichia coli viability determination using dynamic light scattering: a comparison with standard methods. Arch Microbiol 196, 557–563 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-0995-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-0995-x

Keywords

Navigation