Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling buried cables illuminated by incident fields for electromagnetic transient analysis in the Laplace domain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a procedure to obtain two-port admittance models of buried cables illuminated by incident electromagnetic fields for the analysis of transients in the frequency domain is presented. The procedure is based on cascading two-port admittance models of various cable segments, avoiding the numerical problems that chain matrix representations may have. To obtain results in the time domain, the Numerical Laplace Transform method is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tavighi A, Martí JR, Gutierrez-Robles J (2015) Comparison of the fdline and ULM frequency dependent EMTP line models with a reference Laplace solution. In: Proceedings of the international conference on power systems transients (IPST 2015), Cavtat, Croatia, June 15–18

  2. Uribe FA, Naredo JL, Moreno P, Guardado L (2002) Electromagnetic transients in underground transmission systems through the numerical Laplace transform. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 24(3):215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreno P, Ramirez A (2008) Implementation of the numerical Laplace transform: a review. IEEE Trans Power Del 23(4):2599–2609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wedepohl LM, Indulkar CS (1975) Switching overvoltages in short crossbonded cable systems using the Fourier transform. Proc IEE 122(11):1217–1221

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrache E, Rachidi F, Paolone M, Nucci C, Rakov VA, Uman MA (2005) Lightning-induced disturbances on buried cables. Part I: theory. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 47(3):498–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paolone M, Petrache E, Rachidi F, Nucci CA, Rakov VA, Uman MA, Jordan D, Rambo K, Jerauld J, Nyffeler M, Schoene J (2005) Lightning-induced disturbances on buried cables. Part II: experiment and model validation. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 47(3):509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor CD, Castillo JP (1978) On electromagnetic-field excitation of unshielded multiconductor cables. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 20(1):495–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agrawal AK, Price HJ, Gurbaxani SH (1980) Transient response of a multiconductor transmission line excited by a nonuniform electromagnetic field. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 22(2):119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rachidi F (1993) Formulation of the field-to-transmission line coupling equations in terms of magnetic excitation field. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 35(3):404–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rachidi F (2012) A review of field-to-transmission line coupling models with special emphasis to lightning-induced voltages. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 54(4):898–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paulino JOS, Barbosa CF, Lopes IJS, de Miranda GC (2009) Time-domain analysis of rocket-triggered lightning-induced surges on an overhead line. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 51(3):725–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nucci CA, Rachidi F, Ianoz M, Mazzetti C (1993) Lightning-induced voltages on overhead lines. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 35(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vance EF (1978) Coupling to Shielded Cable. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paulino JOS, Barbosa CF, Boaventura WC (2014) Lightning-induced current in a cable buried in the first layer of a two-layer ground. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 56(4):956–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Galvan A, Cooray GV (1999) Lightning induced voltages on bare and insulated buried cables. In: Proceedings of 13th Zurich international symposium and technical exhibition on EMC, Zurich

  16. Omid M, Kami Y, Hayakawa M (1999) Field coupling to nonuniform and uniform transmission lines. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 39(3):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomez P, Moreno P, Naredo JL (2005) Frequency-domain transient analysis of nonuniform lines with incident field excitation. IEEE Trans Power Del 20(3):2273–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wedepohl LM, Indulkar CS (1974) Wave propagation in nonhomogeneous systems. Properties of the chain matrix. Proc Inst Electr Eng 121(9):997–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilcox DJ (1978) Numerical Laplace transformation and inversion. Int J Elect Eng Educ 15(3):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barbosa CF, SaldanhaPaulino JO (2007) An approximate time-domain formula for the calculation of the horizontal electric field from lightning. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 49(3):593–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubinstein M (1996) An approximate formula for the calculation of the horizontal electric field from lightning at close, intermediate, and long range. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 38(3):531–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooray V (2001) Underground electromagnetic fields generated by the return strokes of lightning flashes. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 43(1):75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wedepohl LM, Indulkar CS (1975) Switching overvoltages in short crossbonded cable systems using the Fourier transform. Proc Inst Electr Eng 122(11):1217–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manitoba HVDC Research Centre (2022) PSCAD/EMTDC: electromagnetic transients including DC. 211 Commerce Drive, Winnipeg

  25. Delfino F, Procopio R, Rossi M, Rachidi F, Nucci CA (2007) An algorithm for the exact evaluation of the underground lightning electromagnetic fields. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 49(2):401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rakov VA (1997) Lightning electromagnetic fields: modeling and measurements. In: Proceedings of 12th International Zurich symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 59–64

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mr. Jorge G. Hernández-Sarmiento thanks the scholarship granted by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología of México to pursue graduate studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jorge G. Hernández-Sarmiento wrote the computer codes that were required for the calculations and producing the figures that show the results. All authors contributed to the conceptual development of the proposed model and to the writing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Moreno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Azimuthal magnetic field

The return stroke model MTLE [26] is used in this paper, for this model the channel current is given by

$$i\left({y}^{{\prime}},t\right)=u(t-{y}^{{\prime}}/{v}_{f}) {e}^{-{y}^{{\prime}}/\lambda } i(0,t-{y}^{{\prime}}/{v}_{f})$$
(A.1)

where \(u(t)\) is the Heaviside function, \({v}_{f}\) is the return stroke velocity, with a value of \({1.5\times 10}^{8} \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}\), \(\lambda \) is the decay constant, which is considered equal to 2 km [26].

The Heidler function is used to represent the channel base current in (A.1), which is given by [25]:

$$i\left(0,t\right)=\frac{{I}_{1}}{{\eta }_{1}}{\left(\frac{t}{{\tau }_{11}}\right)}^{{n}_{1}}\frac{{e}^{-t/{\tau }_{12}}}{1+{\left(t/{\tau }_{11}\right)}^{{n}_{1}}}$$
(A.2)

where

$${\eta }_{1}=exp\left[-\left(\frac{{\tau }_{11}}{{\tau }_{12}}\right){\left(\frac{{n}_{1}{\tau }_{12}}{{\tau }_{11}}\right)}^{1/{n}_{1}}\right]$$
(A.3)

In addition \(I_{1} = 28\,{\text{kA}}\), \(\tau_{11} = 1.8\,\upmu {\text{s}}\), \(\tau_{12} = 95\,\upmu {\text{s}}\) and \(n_{1} = 2\).

According to [20], the channel base current can be represented with the function shown in Fig. 19 and defined by

$$i\left(t\right)= \frac{{I}_{0}}{T}\left[u(t)t-u(t-T)(t-T)\right]$$
(A.4)

The azimuthal magnetic field on the ground surface due to \(i(t)\) is given by [20]

$$\begin{array}{c}{H}_{\phi p}(t,r,d=0)={H}_{S}\frac{{T}_{0}}{{v}_{R} T}\left[u\left(t-{T}_{0}\right)\left[\sqrt{1+{\left(\frac{{v}_{f} t}{r}\right)}^{2}-{{v}_{R}}^{2}}-1\right]\right.\\ \left. -u(t-{T}_{0}-T)\left[\sqrt{1+{\left(\frac{{v}_{f}(t-T)}{r}\right)}^{2}-{{v}_{R}}^{2}}-1\right]\right]\end{array}$$
(A.5)

where \({v}_{R}={v}_{f}/{c}_{0}\) is the relative velocity of the return stroke, \({c}_{0}\) is the speed of light, \({T}_{0}=r/{c}_{0}\) is the arrival time of the field wave at the observation point; \({H}_{S}\) is the magnetostatic field achieved after a long period of time given by

$${H}_{S}=\frac{{I}_{0}}{2\pi r}$$
(A.6)

where \({I}_{0}\) is the peak value of the channel current.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Channel base current

The azimuthal magnetic field due to \(i\left({y}^{{\prime}},t\right)\), or any arbitrary current, can be obtained by applying superposition. The time period of interest is divided into N intervals of duration Δt. Then a vector is generated with the current increments of the intervals, according to the following expression:

$$ \Delta i\left( {y^{\prime},j} \right) = i\left( {y^{\prime},j\Delta t} \right) - i\left( {y^{\prime },\left( {j - 1} \right)\Delta t} \right),\quad for\;j = 1,2, \ldots ,N $$
(A.7)

Expression (A.5) can be solved for a current of unit amplitude (\({I}_{0}=1\)) and a rise time \(T=\Delta t\), in each of the N intervals. This results in a vector of magnetic fields \({H}_{I}(j)\). The total azimuthal magnetic field at \(t=k{\Delta} {\mathrm {t}}\) \((1\le k\le N)\) is obtained with the superposition of the magnetic fields produced by k unit trapezoids, scaled by the current increments as follows

$${H}_{\phi p}\left(k\right)= \sum_{j=1}^{k}{H}_{I}\left(j\right)\Delta i\left({y}^{{\prime}},k-j+1\right)$$
(A.8)

The azimuthal magnetic field is transformed to the frequency domain and then used to obtain the horizontal electric field.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Sarmiento, J.G., Moreno, P., Loo-Yau, J.R. et al. Modelling buried cables illuminated by incident fields for electromagnetic transient analysis in the Laplace domain. Electr Eng 105, 3209–3217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-01872-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-01872-w

Keywords

Navigation