Abstract
In this work, a procedure to obtain two-port admittance models of buried cables illuminated by incident electromagnetic fields for the analysis of transients in the frequency domain is presented. The procedure is based on cascading two-port admittance models of various cable segments, avoiding the numerical problems that chain matrix representations may have. To obtain results in the time domain, the Numerical Laplace Transform method is used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tavighi A, Martí JR, Gutierrez-Robles J (2015) Comparison of the fdline and ULM frequency dependent EMTP line models with a reference Laplace solution. In: Proceedings of the international conference on power systems transients (IPST 2015), Cavtat, Croatia, June 15–18
Uribe FA, Naredo JL, Moreno P, Guardado L (2002) Electromagnetic transients in underground transmission systems through the numerical Laplace transform. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 24(3):215–221
Moreno P, Ramirez A (2008) Implementation of the numerical Laplace transform: a review. IEEE Trans Power Del 23(4):2599–2609
Wedepohl LM, Indulkar CS (1975) Switching overvoltages in short crossbonded cable systems using the Fourier transform. Proc IEE 122(11):1217–1221
Petrache E, Rachidi F, Paolone M, Nucci C, Rakov VA, Uman MA (2005) Lightning-induced disturbances on buried cables. Part I: theory. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 47(3):498–508
Paolone M, Petrache E, Rachidi F, Nucci CA, Rakov VA, Uman MA, Jordan D, Rambo K, Jerauld J, Nyffeler M, Schoene J (2005) Lightning-induced disturbances on buried cables. Part II: experiment and model validation. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 47(3):509–520
Taylor CD, Castillo JP (1978) On electromagnetic-field excitation of unshielded multiconductor cables. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 20(1):495–500
Agrawal AK, Price HJ, Gurbaxani SH (1980) Transient response of a multiconductor transmission line excited by a nonuniform electromagnetic field. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 22(2):119–129
Rachidi F (1993) Formulation of the field-to-transmission line coupling equations in terms of magnetic excitation field. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 35(3):404–407
Rachidi F (2012) A review of field-to-transmission line coupling models with special emphasis to lightning-induced voltages. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 54(4):898–911
Paulino JOS, Barbosa CF, Lopes IJS, de Miranda GC (2009) Time-domain analysis of rocket-triggered lightning-induced surges on an overhead line. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 51(3):725–732
Nucci CA, Rachidi F, Ianoz M, Mazzetti C (1993) Lightning-induced voltages on overhead lines. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 35(1):75–86
Vance EF (1978) Coupling to Shielded Cable. Wiley, New York
Paulino JOS, Barbosa CF, Boaventura WC (2014) Lightning-induced current in a cable buried in the first layer of a two-layer ground. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 56(4):956–963
Galvan A, Cooray GV (1999) Lightning induced voltages on bare and insulated buried cables. In: Proceedings of 13th Zurich international symposium and technical exhibition on EMC, Zurich
Omid M, Kami Y, Hayakawa M (1999) Field coupling to nonuniform and uniform transmission lines. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 39(3):201–211
Gomez P, Moreno P, Naredo JL (2005) Frequency-domain transient analysis of nonuniform lines with incident field excitation. IEEE Trans Power Del 20(3):2273–2280
Wedepohl LM, Indulkar CS (1974) Wave propagation in nonhomogeneous systems. Properties of the chain matrix. Proc Inst Electr Eng 121(9):997–1000
Wilcox DJ (1978) Numerical Laplace transformation and inversion. Int J Elect Eng Educ 15(3):247–265
Barbosa CF, SaldanhaPaulino JO (2007) An approximate time-domain formula for the calculation of the horizontal electric field from lightning. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 49(3):593–601
Rubinstein M (1996) An approximate formula for the calculation of the horizontal electric field from lightning at close, intermediate, and long range. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 38(3):531–535
Cooray V (2001) Underground electromagnetic fields generated by the return strokes of lightning flashes. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 43(1):75–84
Wedepohl LM, Indulkar CS (1975) Switching overvoltages in short crossbonded cable systems using the Fourier transform. Proc Inst Electr Eng 122(11):1217–1221
Manitoba HVDC Research Centre (2022) PSCAD/EMTDC: electromagnetic transients including DC. 211 Commerce Drive, Winnipeg
Delfino F, Procopio R, Rossi M, Rachidi F, Nucci CA (2007) An algorithm for the exact evaluation of the underground lightning electromagnetic fields. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 49(2):401–411
Rakov VA (1997) Lightning electromagnetic fields: modeling and measurements. In: Proceedings of 12th International Zurich symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 59–64
Acknowledgements
Mr. Jorge G. Hernández-Sarmiento thanks the scholarship granted by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología of México to pursue graduate studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jorge G. Hernández-Sarmiento wrote the computer codes that were required for the calculations and producing the figures that show the results. All authors contributed to the conceptual development of the proposed model and to the writing and revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix
Azimuthal magnetic field
The return stroke model MTLE [26] is used in this paper, for this model the channel current is given by
where \(u(t)\) is the Heaviside function, \({v}_{f}\) is the return stroke velocity, with a value of \({1.5\times 10}^{8} \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}\), \(\lambda \) is the decay constant, which is considered equal to 2 km [26].
The Heidler function is used to represent the channel base current in (A.1), which is given by [25]:
where
In addition \(I_{1} = 28\,{\text{kA}}\), \(\tau_{11} = 1.8\,\upmu {\text{s}}\), \(\tau_{12} = 95\,\upmu {\text{s}}\) and \(n_{1} = 2\).
According to [20], the channel base current can be represented with the function shown in Fig. 19 and defined by
The azimuthal magnetic field on the ground surface due to \(i(t)\) is given by [20]
where \({v}_{R}={v}_{f}/{c}_{0}\) is the relative velocity of the return stroke, \({c}_{0}\) is the speed of light, \({T}_{0}=r/{c}_{0}\) is the arrival time of the field wave at the observation point; \({H}_{S}\) is the magnetostatic field achieved after a long period of time given by
where \({I}_{0}\) is the peak value of the channel current.
The azimuthal magnetic field due to \(i\left({y}^{{\prime}},t\right)\), or any arbitrary current, can be obtained by applying superposition. The time period of interest is divided into N intervals of duration Δt. Then a vector is generated with the current increments of the intervals, according to the following expression:
Expression (A.5) can be solved for a current of unit amplitude (\({I}_{0}=1\)) and a rise time \(T=\Delta t\), in each of the N intervals. This results in a vector of magnetic fields \({H}_{I}(j)\). The total azimuthal magnetic field at \(t=k{\Delta} {\mathrm {t}}\) \((1\le k\le N)\) is obtained with the superposition of the magnetic fields produced by k unit trapezoids, scaled by the current increments as follows
The azimuthal magnetic field is transformed to the frequency domain and then used to obtain the horizontal electric field.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hernández-Sarmiento, J.G., Moreno, P., Loo-Yau, J.R. et al. Modelling buried cables illuminated by incident fields for electromagnetic transient analysis in the Laplace domain. Electr Eng 105, 3209–3217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-01872-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-01872-w