Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of High-Performance Two-Stage CPG Interfaced with GTSPPS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presented paper deals with the analysis of a two-stage constant power generation (CPG) interfaced with a grid-tied solar photovoltaic power system (GTSPPS). In earlier days, for extracting the maximum power point in GTSPPS, different types of MPPT controllers were used. These techniques fail whenever a change in solar irradiance takes place. A CPG technique was proposed that makes use of a single stage, but this technique still has a drawback as its operating area always lies to the right of MPPT, so whenever a sudden change in solar irradiance occurs, the robustness of the CPG algorithm decreases. Thus, there is a need for two-stage CPG so as to have a stable, constant power generation. Further, the performance of two-stage CPG has been compared with different control techniques under dynamic as well as steady-state conditions to know its suitability under practical conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stetz T, Marten F, Braun M (2013) Improved low voltage grid-integration of photovoltaic systems in Germany. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4(2):534–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed A, Ran L, Moon S, Park J-H (2013) A fast PV power tracking control algorithm with reduced power mode. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 28(3):565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Y, Wang H, Blaabjerg F, Kerekes T (2014) A hybrid power control concept for PV inverters with reduced thermal loading. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29(12):6271–6275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yadav U, Gupta A, Ahuja R (2020) Robust control design procedure and simulation of PRES controller having phase-locked loop (PLL) control technique in Grid-Tied Converter. In: 2020 3rd international seminar on research of information technology and intelligent systems (ISRITI), pp 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRITI51436.2020.9315358

  5. Esram T, Chapman P (2007) Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 22(2):439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hohm D, Ropp M (2000) Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms using an experimental, programmable, maximum power point tracking test bed. In: Presented at IEEE 28th photovoltaic specialists Conference, Anchorage, AL, USA

  7. Hanzaei SH, Gorji SA, Ektesabi M (2020) A scheme-based review of MPPT techniques with respect to input variables including solar irradiance and PV arrays’ temperature. IEEE Access 8:182229–182239. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yap KY, Sarimuthu CR, Lim JM-Y (2020) Artificial intelligence based MPPT techniques for solar power system: a review. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy 8(6):1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.35833/MPCE.2020.000159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tousi SMR, Moradi MH, Basir NS, Nemati M (2016) A functionbased maximum power point tracking method for photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(3):2120–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teng JH, Huang WH, Hsu TA, Wang CY (2016) Novel and fast maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic generation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 1:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghasemi MA, Forushani HM, Parniani M (2016) Partial shading detection and smooth maximum power point tracking of PV arrays under PSC. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(9):6281–6292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuwanda RI, Prasetyono E, Eviningsih RP (2020) Constant power generation using modified MPPT P&O to overcome overvoltage on solar power plants. Int Semin Intell Technol Appl (ISITIA) 2020:392–397. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA49792.2020.9163685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Femia N, Petrone G, Spagnuolo G, Vitelli M (2009) A technique for improving P&O MPPT performances of double-stage grid-connected photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 56(11):4473–4482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koutroulis E, Voulgaris N (2001) Development of a microcontroller-based, photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control system. IEEE Trans Power Electron 16(1):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiu H, Lo Y, Yao C, Lee T, Wang J, Lee J (2011) A modular selfcontrolled photovoltaic charger with interintegrated circuit (I2 C) interface. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 26(1):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. German federal law: renewable energy sources act (Gesetz fur den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien), BGBl Std, Document No: BGBl. I S. 1066, Jul 2014Mar

  17. Energinet.dk, “Technical regulation 3.2.5 for wind power plants with a power output greater than 11 kW,” Energinet.dk, Errits, Denmark, Document No: 55986/10, Tech Rep, 2010

  18. Tafti HD, Maswood AI, Konstantinou G, Pou J, Blaabjerg F (2018) A general constant power generation algorithm for photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 33(5):4088–4101. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2017.2724544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Y, Blaabjerg F, Wang H (2014) Constant power generation of photovoltaic systems considering the distributed grid capacity. In: 2014 IEEE applied power electronics conference and exposition-APEC 2014, pp. 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2014.6803336

  20. Wandhare RG, Agarwal V (2014) Precise active and reactive power control of the PV-DGS integrated with weak grid to increase PV penetration. In: Proceedings photovoltaic specialist conference, pp. 3150–3155

  21. Cao W et al (2013) Two-stage PV inverter system emulator in converter based power grid emulation system. In: 2013 IEEE energy conversion congress and exposition, pp 4518–4525. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2013.6647305

  22. Urtasun A, Sanchis P, Marroyo L (2013) Limiting the power generated by a photovoltaic system. In: Proceedings systems & signals devices, pp. 1–6

  23. Blaabjerg F, Teodorescu R, Liserre M, Timbus AV (2006) Overview of control and grid synchronization for distributed power generation systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 53(5):1398–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang B, Li W, Zhao Y, He X (2010) Design and analysis of a gridconnected photovoltaic power system. IEEE Trans Power Electron 25(4):992–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y, Blaabjerg F, Wang H (2014) Constant power generation of photovoltaic systems considering the distributed grid capacity. In: Proceedings applied power electronics conference, pp. 379–385

  26. Messai A, Mellit A, Guessoum A, Kalogirou SA (2011) Maximum power point tracking using a GA optimized fuzzy logic controller and its FPGA implementation. Sol Energy 85:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sangwongwanich A, Yang Y, Blaabjerg F (2016) High performance constant power generation in grid connected PV systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(3):1822–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work written is entirely original, acknowledges all sources of data and appropriately represents the work or words of others in citations or quotations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, J C Bose University of Science and Technology YMCA, Faridabad, India

    Uma Yadav, Anju Gupta & Rajesh Ahuja

Authors
  1. Uma Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anju Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajesh Ahuja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uma Yadav.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, U., Gupta, A. & Ahuja, R. Analysis of High-Performance Two-Stage CPG Interfaced with GTSPPS. Electr Eng 106, 1825–1839 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01611-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01611-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation