Skip to main content
Log in

Active power loss allocation in radial distribution networks with power factor variation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consumers of power distribution networks are usually advised to maintain improved load power factor (LPF) as it affects power loss of a feeder network which has a significant impact on electrical tariff structure. Hence, a judicious loss allocation procedure should incorporate an adequate rewarding/penalising policy for improved/poor power factor consumers, respectively. Keeping this in view, this paper introduces a new active power loss allocation (APLA) scheme which assigns losses to the network participants with due consideration to their load demands, geographical locations and power factors. The proposed methodology awards incentives/penalties only to the concerned consumers against variation in LPFs, which is validated through a proper mathematical and statistical analysis. It allocates losses by simplifying the impact of cross-terms mathematically from loss formulation without any assumptions and approximations. The effectiveness of the proposed APLA method is investigated at two different scenarios of LPFs using 30-bus and 33-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs). The performance with regard to variations in distributed generator power factor is also verified with the considered 30-bus RDN. The comparison results obtained highlight the novelty of the present procedure against other established methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(n\) :

Node Number

\(nb\) :

Total number of buses in the RDN

\(^{ * }\) :

Represents the symbol for getting conjugate of a complex number

\(V_{n{\rm vlt}}^{n}\) :

Voltage at node ‘\(n\)

\(P_{\rm load}^{n}\) :

Load active power at node ‘\(n\)

\(P_{\rm dg}^{n}\) :

DG injected active power at node ‘\(n\)

\(P_{\rm inj}^{n}\) :

Total active power at node ‘\(n\)

\(I_{b{\rm crt}}^{bc}\) :

Current of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(P_{\rm inj}^{bc,n}\) :

Total active power at the subsequent node ‘\(n\)’ of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(V_{n{\rm vlt}}^{bc,n}\) :

Voltage at the subsequent node ‘\(n\)’ of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(V_{n{\rm vlt}}^{bc,{\rm re}}\) :

Receiving end voltage of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(S_{b{\rm loss}}^{bc}\) :

Apparent power loss of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(Q_{b{\rm loss}}^{bc}\) :

Reactive power loss of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(B_{n{\rm img}}^{bc,n}\) :

Imaginary part associated with the subsequent node ‘\(n\)’ of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(P_{n{\rm loss}}^{n}\) :

Total active power loss of node ‘\(n\)

\(PF_{\rm conj}^{n}\) :

Power factor of the consumer connected at node-\(n\)

\(bc\) :

Branch number

\(\Re\) :

Represents the symbol for getting real value of a complex number

\(\varepsilon\) :

Represents the symbol for ‘belongs to’

\(SN(bc)\) :

Array which stores the subsequent nodes of a branch ‘\(bc\)

\(Q_{\rm load}^{n}\) :

Load reactive power at node ‘\(n\)

\(Q_{\rm dg}^{n}\) :

DG injected reactive power at node ‘\(n\)

\(Q_{\rm inj}^{n}\) :

Total reactive power at node ‘\(n\)

\(I_{\rm neci}^{n}\) :

Equivalent current injection at node ‘\(n\)

\(Q_{\rm inj}^{bc,n}\) :

Total reactive power at the subsequent node ‘\(n\)’ of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(V_{n{\rm vlt}}^{bc,{\rm se}}\) :

Sending end voltage of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(Z_{\rm bimp}^{bc}\) :

Impedance of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(P_{\rm bloss}^{bc}\) :

Active power loss of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(A_{n{\rm rel}}^{bc,n}\) :

Real part associated with the subsequent node ‘\(n\)’ of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(P_{n{\rm loss}}^{bc,n}\) :

Active power loss associated with the subsequent node ‘\(n\)’ of branch ‘\(bc\)

\(P_{t{\rm loss}}^{\rm RDN}\) :

Total active power loss of the RDN

References

  1. Abdelkader S (2006) Transmission loss allocation in a deregulated electrical energy market. Electr Power Syst Res 76:962–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khosravi M, Monsef H, Aliabadi MH (2018) Loss allocation in distribution network including distributed energy resources (DERs). Int Trans Elect Energy Syst 28: e2548.

  3. Fadel W, Kilic U, Taskin S (2017) Placement of Dg, Cb, and Tcsc in radial distribution system for power loss minimization using back-tracking search algorithm. Electr Eng 99:791–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jagtap KM, Khatod DK (2014) Impact of different types of distributed generation on radial distribution network. In: Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Reliability and Operation of Information Technology, Faridabad, India, pp 473–476.

  5. Usman M, Coppo M, Bignucolo F, Turri R (2018) Loss management strategies in active distribution networks: A review. Electric Power Syst Res 163:116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khodapanah M, Zobaa AF, Abbod M (2018) Estimating power factor of induction motors at any loading conditions using support vector regression (SVR). Electr Eng 100:2579–2588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. kVAh billing, [online] https://www.mahadiscom.in/wpcontent/uploads/2020/01/002 ANNEXURE-6 FAQs-REGARDINGkVAh-BILLING.pdf

  8. Motor Challenge, ‘Reducing Power Factor Cost’, [ online ] https:// www. energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/ 04/f15/mc60405.pdf

  9. Czarnecki L (2000) Energy flow and power phenomena in electrical circuits: illusions and reality. Electr Eng 82:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Victor M, Lopez-Martin AFJ, Pigazo A (2018) Power quality enhancement in residential smart grids through power factor correction stages. IEEE Trans Ind Elect 65(11):8553–8564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishra S, Das D, Paul S (2010) Active loss allocation schemes in radial distribution systems. Cogenerat Distribut Generat J 25(3):26–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Happ HH (1994) Cost of wheeling methodologies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mishra S, Das D, Paul S (2012) A simple algorithm to implement active loss allocation schemes in radial distribution systems. J Inst Eng (India): Series B 93(3): 123–132

  14. Galiana FD, Conejo AJ, Kockar I (2002) Incremental transmission loss allocation under pool dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choudhury NBD, De M, Goswami SK (2013) Transmission loss allocation in a power market using artificial neural network. Electr Eng 95(2):87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpaneto E, Chicco G, Akilimali JS (2006) Branch current decomposition method for loss allocation in radial distribution systems with distributed generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(3):1170–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jagtap KM, Khatod DK (2015) Loss allocation in radial distribution networks with different load models and distributed generations. IET Gener Trans Distrib 9:1275–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hota AP, Mishra S (2021) A Forward-Backward Sweep based numerical approach for active power loss allocation of radial distribution network with distributed generations. Int J Numer Modell Elect Netw Dev Fields, Wiley 34(1):e2788. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mishra S, Das D (2008) A novel active loss allocation scheme unbalanced radial distribution system. Int Rev Elect Eng 4(4):543–550

    Google Scholar 

  20. Atanasovski M, Taleski R (2011) Power summation method for loss allocation in radial distribution networks with DG. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26:2491–2499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Atanasovski M, Taleski R (2012) Energy summation method for loss allocation in radial distribution networks with DG. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27:1433–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jahromi ZG, Mahmoodzadeh Z, Ehsan M (2014) Distribution loss allocation for radial systems including DGs. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma S, Abhyankar AR (2017) Loss allocation for weakly meshed distribution system using analytical formulation of Shapley value. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32:1369–1377

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma S, Abhyankar AR (2017) Loss allocation of radial distribution system using Shapley value: a sequential approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 88:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pourahmadi F, Dehghanian PA (2018) Game-theoretic loss allocation approach in power distribution systems with high penetration of distributed generations. Mathematics 6(9):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/math609015

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jagtap KM, Khatod DK (2015) Loss allocation in distribution networks with distributed generations. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9:1628–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar P, Gupta N, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A (2019) A Circuit Theory-based Loss Allocation Method for Active Distribution Systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10(1):1005–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Usman M, Coppo M, Bignucolo F, Turri R, Cerretti A (2019) A novel methodology for the management of distribution network based on neutral losses allocation factors. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 110:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghaemi S, Zare K (2017) Loss allocation in restructured radial distribution networks considering the contractual power. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(6):1389–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kashyap SS, De M (2017) Loss allocation and loss minimisation for radial distribution system including DGs. IET Renew Power Gener 11(6):806–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar P, Gupta N, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A (2019) Exact cross-term decomposition method for loss allocation in contemporary distribution systems. Arab J Sci Eng 44:1977–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hota AP, Mishra S (2020) A new approach for fair loss allocation in radial distribution networks with various types of distributed generators. In: System Reliability, Quality Control, Safety, Maintenance and Management. ICICCT 2019. Springer, Singapore 2020. pp. 728–737.

  33. Hota AP, Mishra S (2020) Loss allocation in distribution networks with distributed generators undergoing network reconfiguration. Int J Elect Comput Eng 10(4):3375–3383

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hota AP, Mishra S (2020)A branch oriented active power loss allocation method for radial distribution networks with distributed generators. Scientia Iranica, https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2020.53987.3546

  35. Usman M, Coppo M, Bignucolo F, Turri R, Cerretti A (2019) Multi-Phase Losses Allocation Method for Active Distribution Networks Based on Branch Current Decomposition. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(5):3605–3615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li H, Cui H, Li C (2019) Distribution network power loss analysis considering uncertainties in distributed generations. Sustainability 11(5):1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar P, Gupta N, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A (2018) Cross-term Decomposition method for loss allocation in distribution systems Considering Load Power factor. Electric Power Components Syst 46(2):218–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mishra S, Das D, Paul S (2010) A simple algorithm for distribution system load flow with distributed generation. In: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering, Jaipur, India, pp. 1–5.

  39. Mishra S, Das D, Paul S (2017) A comprehensive review on power distribution network reconfiguration. Energy Syst 8(2):227–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sivkumar Mishra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hota, A.P., Mishra, S. & Mishra, D.P. Active power loss allocation in radial distribution networks with power factor variation. Electr Eng 104, 1289–1304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01385-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01385-4

Keywords

Navigation