Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A single phase five-level inverter with single and multiple switch fault tolerance capabilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reliability of multilevel inverters (MLIs) is of great importance, when they are employed for applications such as aircrafts, electric vehicles, standalone, and grid connected photovoltaic (PV) system. To achieve required output voltage during post-fault scenarios, several fault tolerant topologies of multilevel inverter have been proposed. However, the primary constraints which add on a limitation to their implementation are increased device count and inability to tolerate single and multiple switch faults with the conduction of lesser or equal switches as in pre-fault case. The inability to tolerate various types of faults, such as open circuit or short circuit, cause severe impact on the system and further increase the cost. In this regard, a fault tolerant (FT) multilevel inverter topology which tolerates aforementioned faults is proposed. The proposed topology is able to withstand both single switch and multiple switch faults with equal or lesser blocking voltage. The proposed topology employs only unidirectional switches, thus increasing the reliability and reducing the cost of inverter. The proposed work is validated experimentally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig.8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodriguez J, Leon J, Kouro S, Portillo R (2008) The age of multilevel converters arrives. industrial electronics. IEEE Power Eng Soc Summer Meet, pp 28–39

  2. Rodríguez J, Lai JS, Peng FZ (2002) Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls, and applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49(4):724–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronanki D, Williamson S (2018) Modular multilevel converters for transportation electrification: challenges and opportunities, vol 4, no 2, IEEE

  4. Baros D, Bampouras K, Apostolidou P, Ioannou E, Papanikolaou N (2017) Multilevel inverters for motor drives and wireless power transfer applications. In: 2017 Panhellenic conference on electronics and telecommunications (PACET), Xanthi, Greece, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACET.2017.8259952

  5. Zhang L, Sun K, Feng L, Wu H, Xing Y (2013) A family of neutral point clamped full-bridge topologies for transformerless photovoltaic grid-tied inverters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(2):730–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pradeep Kumar VVVS, Fernandes BG (2017) A fault-tolerant single-phase grid-connected inverter topology with enhanced reliability for solar PV applications. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 5(3):1254–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fazel SS, Bernet S, Krug D, Jalili K (2007) Design and comparison of 4-kV neutral-point-clamped, flying-capacitor, and series-connected H-bridge multilevel converters. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 43(4):1032–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Musallam M, Yin C, Bailey C, Johnson M (2015) Mission profile-based reliability design and real-time life consumption estimation in power electronics. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(5):2601–2613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jalhotra M, Kumar L, Gautam SP, Gupta S (2018) Development of fault-tolerant MLI topology, vol 11, no 8

  10. Reddy BP, Sahoo MRAM, Keerthipati S (2017) A fault tolerant multilevel inverter for improving the performance of pole-phase modulated nine-phase induction motor drive, vol 65, no 2, IEEE

  11. Li K, Yuan L, Zhao Z, Lu S, Zhang Y (2017) Fault-tolerant control of MMC with hot reserved submodules based on carrier phase shift modulation, vol 32, no 9

  12. Kou X, Ieee SM, Corzine KA, Ieee M, Familiant Y, Street NC (2003) A unique fault-tolerant design for flying capacitor multilevel inverters department of electrical engineering, vol 19, no 4

  13. Farias JVM, Cupertino AF, Pereira HA, Junior SIS, Teodorescu R (2018) On the redundancy strategies of modular multilevel converters, vol 33, no 2

  14. Statcom C, Song W, Member S, Huang AQ, Cascaded A (2010) Fault-tolerant design and control strategy for cascaded H-bridge multilevel. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(8):2700–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yazdani A, Sepahvand H, Member S (2011) Fault detection and mitigation in multilevel converter STATCOMs. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(4):1307–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kou X, Corzine KA, Familiant Y A unique fault-tolerant design for flying capacitor multilevel inverters, no 4, pp 531–538

  17. Ceballos S et al (2008) Three-level converter topologies with switch breakdown fault-tolerance capability. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55(3):982–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ceballos S, Pou J, Robles E, Zaragoza J, Member S, Martín JL (2010) Performance evaluation of fault-tolerant neutral-point-clamped converters, vol 57, no 8, pp 2709–2718

  19. Ceballos S, Pou J, Zaragoza J, Robles E, Villate JL, Martín JL (2011) Fault-tolerant neutral-point-clamped converter solutions based on including a fourth resonant leg. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(6):2293–2303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DC-DC Converter (2010) New circuit topology for fault tolerant H-Bridge, vol 25, no 6, pp 1509–1516

  21. Chen A, Hu L, Chen L, Deng Y, Yao G, He X (2004) A multilevel converter topology with fault tolerant ability, vol 00, no 50277035, pp 1610–1616

  22. Nicolas-Apruzzese J, Busquets-Monge S, Bordonau J, Alepuz S, Calle-Prado A (2013) Analysis of the fault-tolerance capacity of the multilevel active-clamped converter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60(11):4773–4783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sivakumar K (2015) A fault-tolerant single-phase five-level inverter for grid-independent PV systems, vol 62, no 12, IEEE

  24. Aly M, Ahmed E, Shoyama M (2018) A new single phase five-level inverter topology for single and multiple switches fault tolerance. IEEE Trans. Power Electron 8993:1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ghazanfari A, Mohamed YARI (2016) A resilient framework for fault-tolerant operation of modular multilevel converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(5):2669–2678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gautam SP, Kumar L, Gupta S, Agrawal N (2017) A single-phase five-level inverter topology with switch fault-tolerance capabilities, vol 64, no 3. IEEE

  27. Haji-Esmaeili MM, Naseri M, Khoun-Jahan H, Abapour M (2016) Fault-tolerant structure for cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter and reliability evaluation. IET Power Electron 10(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hossein KJ, Farhad P, Mehdi A, Sajjad T (2017) Reconfigurable Multilevel inverter with fault tolerant ability. IEEE Trans Power Electron 8993:1

    Google Scholar 

  29. Military handbook reliability prediction of electronic equipment 217F (1991)

  30. Sahu LK, Allamsetty HC, Ghosh S (2019) Performance analysis of multiple input converter for standalone photovoltaic system. In: IET power electronics, vol 12, no 5, pp 1295–1306

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Guruvulu Naidu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

1.1 Evaluation of reliability

Reliability estimation of the proposed topology and other works based on Military Hand book MIL-HDBK-217F [29, 30] is presented.

The probability of having no failure for duration t is defined by function Rs(t) as

$$ R_{s} (t) = e^{{ - \left( {\lambda_{sys} \times t} \right)}} $$
(A1)

where λsys is the failure rate of system.

The mean time to failure (MTTF) can be calculated from Rs(t) as

$$ {\text{MTTF}} = \int\limits_{0}^{\infty } {R_{s} \left( t \right){\text{d}}t} = \frac{1}{{\lambda_{{{\text{sys}}}} }} $$
(A2)

The failure rate of MOSFET (failures per million hours) is given by

$$ \lambda_{{\text{S}}} = \lambda_{{\text{b}}} \pi_{{\text{T}}} \pi_{{\text{A}}} \pi_{{\text{Q}}} \pi_{{\text{E}}} $$
(A3)

where λb is the base failure rate, \(\pi_{{\text{A}}}\) is application factor which depends on the rated output power, \(\pi_{{\text{Q}}}\) is the quality factor and \(\pi_{{\text{E}}}\) is the environmental factor. The temperature factor \(\pi_{{\text{T}}}\) depends on the junction temperature TJ as given by

$$ \pi_{{\text{T}}} = \exp \left[ { - 1925\left( {\frac{1}{{T_{{\text{J}}} + 273}} - \frac{1}{298}} \right)} \right] $$
(A4)

where TJ is a function of the ambient temperature Ta (25 °C), the junction to thermal ambient resistance θJA, and the total power dissipation (conduction loss and switching loss together) of the switching device PS, given as

$$ T_{{\text{J}}} = T_{{\text{a}}} + \left( {\theta_{{{\text{JA}}}} } \right)P_{{\text{S}}} $$
(A5)

Similarly the failure rate of diode (λdiode failures/million hours) is calculated as

$$ \lambda_{{{\text{diode}}}} = \lambda_{{\text{b}}} \pi_{{\text{T}}} \pi_{{\text{S}}} \pi_{{\text{C}}} \pi_{{\text{Q}}} \pi_{{\text{E}}} $$
(A6)

where \(\pi_{{\text{S}}}\) is the electrical stress factor given by \(V_{{\text{s}}}^{2.43}\), where Vs is the ratio of applied voltage to rated voltage, \(\pi_{{\text{C}}}\) is the contact construction factor. The temperature factor \(\pi_{{\text{T}}}\) is given by

$$ \pi_{{\text{T}}} = \exp \left[ { - 2100\left( {\frac{1}{{T_{{\text{J}}} + 273}} - \frac{1}{298}} \right)} \right] $$
(A7)

where

$$ T_{{\text{J}}} = T_{{\text{a}}} + \left( {\theta_{{{\text{JA}}}} } \right)P_{{\text{D}}} $$
(A8)

where PD, is the power dissipated across diode.

The failure rate of capacitor (λcap failures/million hours) is given by

$$ \lambda_{{{\text{cap}}}} = \lambda_{{\text{b}}} \pi_{{\text{T}}} \pi_{{\text{C}}} \pi_{{\text{V}}} \pi_{{{\text{SR}}}} \pi_{{\text{Q}}} \pi_{{\text{E}}} $$
(A9)

where \(\pi_{{\text{C}}}\) is the capacitance factor given by (C in µF)0.23, \(\pi_{{{\text{SR}}}}\) is the series resistance factor and \(\pi_{{\text{V}}}\) is the voltage stress factor given by

$$ \pi_{{\text{V}}} = \left( {\frac{S}{0.6}} \right)^{17} + 1 $$
(A10)

where S is ratio of the operating voltage to the rated voltage.

The temperature factor \(\pi_{{\text{T}}}\) is given by

$$ \pi_{{\text{T}}} = \exp \left[ {\frac{{ - E_{{\text{a}}} }}{{8.617 \times 10^{ - 5} }}\left( {\frac{1}{T + 273} - \frac{1}{298}} \right)} \right] $$
(A11)

The failure rate of the system with N number of inputs is given by

$$ \lambda_{{{\text{sys}}}} = \lambda_{{\text{S}}} + \lambda_{{\text{D}}} + \lambda_{{{\text{cap}}}} $$
(A12)

where suffix i is the ith input and suffix b indicates the boost element in the converter. The parameters used for the calculation of reliability are listed in Table

Table 6 List of the parameter values employed for reliability evaluation

6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naidu, P.G., Saibabu, C. & Satyanarayana, S. A single phase five-level inverter with single and multiple switch fault tolerance capabilities. Electr Eng 103, 3139–3150 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01295-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01295-5

Keywords

Navigation