Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A predictive energy management system for hybrid energy storage systems in electric vehicles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy management system plays a vital role in exploiting advantages of battery and supercapacitor hybrid energy storage systems in electric vehicles. Various energy management systems have been reported in the literature, of which the model predictive control is attracting more attentions due to its advantage in deal with system constraints. In this paper, a predictive energy management system is proposed based on a combination of Haar wavelet transform and model predictive control. Different from prior publications, the main contribution of this study is that the wavelet transform algorithm is introduced for power demand decomposition. At the same time, the power errors of the model predictive controllers are also fed to the wavelet transform algorithm for coefficient regulation. In this way, the power components distributed to the battery and supercapacitor can better match to their individual characteristics. The proposed method can reduce the maximum voltage drop of the battery up to 10.53%, 9.09% and 23.53%, the battery life cost up to 9.09%, 6.52% and 2.82%, respectively, as compared with the sole model predictive controller without wavelet transform based on NYCC, UDDS and NurembergR36 three driving cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EMS:

Energy management system

HESS:

Hybrid energy storage system

MPC:

Model predictive control

WT:

Wavelet transform

EV:

Electric vehicle

SC:

Supercapacitor

DP:

Dynamic programming

PSO:

Particle swarm optimization

GA:

Genetic algorithm

SA:

Simulated annealing

DC:

Direct current

NYCC:

New York City Cycle

UDDS:

Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule

ECMS:

Equivalent consumption minimization strategy

PMP:

Pontryagin’s minimum principle

S SC :

Control command of DC/DC connected to SC

R b :

Resistance of DC/DC connected to battery

L b :

Inductance of DC/DC connected to battery

S bat :

Control command of DC/DC connected to battery

L c :

Inductance of DC/DC converter connected to SC

R c :

Resistance of DC/DC connected to SC

R f C f :

Main cells of SC

R m C m :

Middle cells of SC

R s C s :

Slow cells of SC

R leak :

Loss resistance of SC

U f :

Main cells voltage

U m :

Middle cells voltage

U s :

Slow cells voltage

U SC :

SC output voltage

I SC :

SC output current

z :

Proportion coefficient

x(t):

Original signal

h k :

Low-pass filter coefficient

g k :

High-pass filter coefficient

P :

Prediction horizon of MPC controller

M :

Control horizon of MPC controller

y :

Output value of MPC controller

C b :

Large capacitor

C s :

Characteristic capacitor

R t :

Terminal resistance

U c :

Characteristic capacitor voltage

I bat :

Battery output current

R s :

Surface resistance

U b :

Large capacitor voltage

U bus :

Bus voltage

R e :

End resistance

U bat :

Battery output voltage

References

  1. Manzetti S, Mariasiu F (2015) Electric vehicle battery technologies: from present state to future systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:1004–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andwari AM, Pesiridis A, Rajoo S, Ricardo MB, Esfahanian V (2017) A review of battery electric vehicle technology and readiness levels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:414–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hannan M, Azidin F, Mohamed A (2014) Hybrid electric vehicles and their challenges: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannan M, Hoque M, Mohamed A, Ayob A (2017) Review of energy storage systems for electric vehicle applications: issues and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:771–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kouchachvili L, Yaïci W, Entchev E (2018) Hybrid battery/supercapacitor energy storage system for the electric vehicles. J Power Sources 374:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen J, Dusmez S, Khaligh A (2014) Optimization of sizing and battery cycle life in battery/ultracapacitor hybrid energy storage systems for electric vehicle applications. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 10(4):2112–2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tie SF, Tan CW (2013) A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 20:82–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland C, Weidner J, Dougal R, White R (2002) Experimental characterization of hybrid power systems under pulse current loads. J Power Sources 109:32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Omar N, Daowd M, Hegazy O, Bossche P, Coosemans T, Mierlo J (2012) Electrical double-layer capacitors in hybrid topologies—assessment and evaluation of their performance. Energies 5:4533–4568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuperman A, Aharon I (2011) Battery–ultracapacitor hybrids for pulsed current loads: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam L, Louey R (2006) Development of ultra-battery for hybrid-electric vehicle applications. J Power Sources 158:1140–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bentley P, Stone DA, Schofield N (2005) The parallel combination of a VRLA cell and supercapacitor for use as a hybrid vehicle peak power buffer. J Power Sources 147:288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi ME, Kim SW, Seo S-W (2012) Energy management optimization in a battery/supercapacitor hybrid energy storage system. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burke A, Miller M (2011) The power capability of ultracapacitors and lithium batteries for electric and hybrid vehicle applications. J Power Sources 196:514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Song Z, Li J, Han X, Xu L, Lu L, Ouyang M, Hofmann H (2014) Multi-objective optimization of a semi-active battery/supercapacitor energy storage system for electric vehicles. Appl Energy 135:212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pay S, Baghzouz Y (2003) Effectiveness of BAT-supercapacitor combination in electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of IEEE Bologna PowerTech conference, pp 1–6

  17. Chau K, Wong Y (2001) Hybridization of energy sources in electric vehicles. Energy Convers Manag 42:1059–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Armenta J, Núñez C, Visairo N, Lázaro I (2015) An advanced energy management system for controlling the ultracapacitor discharge and improving the electric vehicle range. J Power Sources 284:452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang B, Xu J, Cao B, Zhou X (2015) A novel multimode hybrid energy storage system and its energy management strategy for electric vehicles. J Power Sources 281:432–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferreira A, Pomilio J, Spiazzi G, Silva LA (2008) Energy management fuzzy logic supervisory for electric vehicle power supplies system. IEEE Trans Power Electron 23:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Michalczuk M, Ufnalski B, Grzesiak LM (2015) Fuzzy logic based power management strategy using topographic data for an electric vehicle with a battery-ultracapacitor energy storage. Int J Comput Math Electr Electron Eng 34:173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Wang W, Zhao Y, Yang L, Chen W (2016) A fuzzy-logic power management strategy based on markov random prediction for hybrid energy storage systems. Energies 9:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Q, Ju F, Zhang S, Deng W, Wu J, Gao C (2017) Power management for hybrid energy storage system of electric vehicles considering inaccurate terrain information. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 14:608–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Florescu A, Bacha S, Munteanu I, Bratcu AI, Rumeau A (2015) Adaptive frequency-separation-based energy management system for electric vehicles. J Power Sources 280:410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Song Z, Hofmann H, Li J, Han X, Ouyang M (2015) Optimization for a hybrid energy storage system in electric vehicles using dynamic programing approach. Appl Energy 139:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abido MA (2002) Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 24(7):563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Piccolo A, Ippolito L, Galdi V, Vaccaro A (2001) Optimization of energy flow management in hybrid electric vehicles via genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Corno, Italy, July 2001, pp 434–439

  28. Trovão JP, Pereirinha PG, Jorge HM, Antunes CH (2013) A multi-level energy management system for multi-source electric vehicles—an integrated rule-based meta-heuristic approach. Appl Energy 105:304–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones DR (2003) Direct global optimization algorithm. In: Floudas CA, Pardalos PM (eds) Encyclopedia of optimization. Springer, New York, pp 431–440

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moreno J, Ortúzar ME, Dixon LW (2006) Energy-management system for a hybrid electric vehicle, using ultracapacitors and neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 53:614–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodatz P, Paganelli G, Sciarretta A, Guzzella L (2005) Optimal power management of an experimental fuel cell/supercapacitor-powered hybrid vehicle. Control Eng Pract 13:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng CH, Kim NW, Cha SW (2012) Optimal control in the power management of fuel cell hybrid vehicles. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(1):655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vahidi A, Stefanopoulou A, Peng H (2006) Current management in a hybrid fuel cell power system: A model predictive control approach. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 14:1047–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jayachandran M, Ravi G (2019) Decentralized model predictive hierarchical control strategy for islanded AC microgrids. Electr Power Syst Res 170:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hredzak B, Agelidis VG, Jang M (2014) A model predictive control system for a hybrid battery-ultracapacitor power source. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29:1469–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Q, Li G (2019) Experimental study on a semi-active battery-supercapacitor hybrid energy storage system for electric vehicle application. IEEE Trans Power Electron (Early Access). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2019.2912425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Project of Liaoning Province Major Technology Platform Grant JP2017002, Guidance Plan of Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province Grant 20180551280, National Science Foundation of China Grant 51675257, Project of Liaoning Province Innovative Talents Grant LR2016054 and Overseas Training Program for Colleges and Universities of Liaoning Province Grant 2018LNGXGJWPY-YB014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Li, G. A predictive energy management system for hybrid energy storage systems in electric vehicles. Electr Eng 101, 759–770 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-019-00822-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-019-00822-9

Keywords

Navigation