Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic field created by a conducting cylindrical shell of finite length

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A conceptually simple result, which was recently derived for the circulation of the magnetic field created by a finite portion of wire carrying a slowly varying current, is used with the superposition principle and symmetry considerations to obtain an expression for the magnetic field of a thin cylindrical shell of finite length. This expression is combined with a new formula for an oblique solid angle, to obtain closed form solutions for the magnetic field created by the thin cylindrical shell segment in all regions of space. The solutions derived herein are applied in the limiting situations where the cylindrical shell’s length or radius is very large and compared to the known results for the magnetic field of a long conducting tube, and of an infinite plane, respectively. In addition, the use of physical principles of superposition and symmetry in this study is instructive from an educational perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maxwell JC (1865) A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Trans R Soc 155:459–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Warburton FW (1954) Displacement current, a useless concept. Am J Phys 22:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. French AP, Tessman JR (1963) Displacement current and magnetic fields. Am J Phys 31:201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Terry WK (1982) The connection between the charged-particle current and the displacement current. Am J Phys 50:742–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths DJ, Heald MA (1991) Time-dependent generalizations of the Biot-Savart and Coulomb laws. Am J Phys 59:111–117

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Roche J (1998) The present status of Maxwell’s displacement current. Eur J Phys 19:155–166

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson JD (1999) Maxwell’s displacement current revisited. Eur J Phys 20:495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charitat T, Graner F (2003) About the magnetic field of a finite wire. Eur J Phys 24:267–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arthur JW (2009) An elementary view of maxwell’s displacement current. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 51:58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heras JA (2011) A formal interpretation of the displacement current and the instantaneous formulation of Maxwell’s equations. Am J Phys 79:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morvay B, Pálfalvi L (2015) On the applicability of Ampère’s law. Eur J Phys 36:065014

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreira JM, Anacleto J (2013) Ampère-Maxwell’s law for a conducting wire: a topological perspective. Eur J Phys 34:1403–1410

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Anacleto J, de Almeida JMMM, Ferreira JM (2012) Intrinsic symmetry of Ampère’s circuital law and other educational issues. Can J Phys 90:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliveira MH, Miranda JA (2001) Biot-Savart-like law in electrostatics. Eur J Phys 22:31–38

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Miranda JA (2000) Magnetic field calculation for arbitrarily shaped planar wires. Am J Phys 68:254–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strelkov S, El’tsin IA and Khaikin SE (1965) Problems in undergraduate physics, vol 2, Electricity and magnetism, 1st edn. Pergamon, London

  17. Tipler PA (1991) Physics for Scientists and Engineers, extended version, 3rd edn. Worth Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bose SK, Scott GK (1985) On the magnetic field of current through a hollow cylinder. Am J Phys 53:584–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffiths DJ (2014) Introduction to electrodynamics, 4th edn. Pearson Education, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li TT, Peng YJ (2000) Parameter identification in SP well-logging. Inverse Probl 16:357–372

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Ferreira.

Appendix: Analytical solution for the solid angle defined by an oblique cone

Appendix: Analytical solution for the solid angle defined by an oblique cone

In the context of spontaneous well-logging parameter identification, Li and Peng [20] derived an analytical solution for the solid angle \(\omega \) defined by an oblique cone (in short ‘oblique solid angle’), which is only valid for \(R_{\mathrm{C}} >R\). As far as is known to us, no solution is available in the literature for \(R_{\mathrm{C}} <R\), the case shown in Fig. 6. In this Appendix, we derive a general analytical solution for the oblique solid angle \(\omega \) valid for all values of \(R_{\mathrm{C}} \) and R.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Shows positive oblique solid angle \(\omega \), \(0\le \omega \le 2\pi \). For the xyz coordinate system chosen, \(\omega \) is symmetrical about the xz-plane. Distances \(\left( {R, \,H} \right) \), circle radius \(\left( {R_{\mathrm{C}} } \right) \), polar coordinates \(\left( {\,\rho ,\theta } \right) \), \(\vec {r}\) being the position vector of elementary area \(\rho \mathrm{d}\theta \mathrm{d}\rho \) relative to the vertex V. If H is allowed to become very small, \(\omega \rightarrow 0\) for \(R_{\mathrm{C}} <R\) and \(\omega \rightarrow 2\pi \) for \(R_{\mathrm{C}} >R\)

From the definition of solid angle, for the choice of coordinate system in Fig. 6,

$$\begin{aligned} \mathrm{d}\omega =\frac{ \vec {r}\cdot \hat{{k}} \mathrm{d}S}{r^{3}}=\frac{H\rho \,\mathrm{d}\theta \,\mathrm{d}\rho }{r^{3}}, \end{aligned}$$
(18)

where \(\hat{{k}}\) is the unit vector along z, \(\mathrm{d}S=\rho \,\mathrm{d}\theta \,\mathrm{d}\rho \) is the infinitesimal area which subtends an elementary solid angle \(d\omega \) with vertex at \(\left( {-R,\;0,\;-H} \right) \), and \(\vec {r}\) is given by:

$$\begin{aligned} \vec {r}= & {} \left( {\rho \,\,\cos \theta ,\;\rho \,\,\sin \theta ,\;0} \right) -\left( {-R,\;0,\;-H} \right) \nonumber \\= & {} \left( {\rho \,\,\cos \theta +R,\;\rho \,\,\sin \theta ,\;H} \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(19)

From (18) and (19), and the symmetry of the solid angle about the xz-plane (Fig. 6), we get:

$$\begin{aligned} \omega =2H\int _0^\pi {\mathrm{d}\theta } \int _0^{R_{\mathrm{C}} } {\frac{\rho \,\mathrm{d}\rho }{\left( {\rho ^{2}+2R\,\rho \cos \theta +R^{2}+H^{2}} \right) ^{{ 3}/2}}} . \end{aligned}$$
(20)

Equation (20) can be written as:

$$\begin{aligned} \omega =H\int _0^\pi {\mathrm{d}\theta } \int _0^{R_{\mathrm{C}} } {\frac{2\rho \,\mathrm{d}\rho }{\left[ {\left( {\rho +R\cos \theta } \right) ^{2}+H^{2}+R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta } \right] ^{{\,3}/2}}} , \end{aligned}$$
(21)

and making the substitution \(u=\rho +R\cos \theta \) gives:

$$\begin{aligned}&\omega =H\int _0^\pi {\mathrm{d}\,\theta } \int _{R\cos \theta }^{R_{\mathrm{C}} +R\cos \theta } {\frac{2u\,\mathrm{d}u}{\left( {\,u^{2}+H^{2}+R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta } \right) ^{{\,3}/2}}}\nonumber \\&\quad ~~~~ -2RH\int _0^\pi {\cos \theta \,\mathrm{d}\theta } \int _{R\cos \theta }^{R_{\mathrm{C}} +R\cos \theta } {\frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\left( {\,u^{2}\,{+}\,H^{2}\,{+}\,R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta } \right) ^{{\,3}/2}}} .\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(22)

Integrating with respect to u the two standard integrals in (22) gives:

$$\begin{aligned} \omega= & {} -2H\int _0^\pi {\mathrm{d}\theta \left. { \left( {u^{2}+H^{2}+R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta } \right) ^{\,-1/2} } \right| _{\,u=R\cos \theta }^{\,u=R_{\mathrm{C}} +R\cos \theta } }\nonumber \\&~~ -2RH\int _0^\pi {\left. {\cos \theta \,\mathrm{d}\theta \frac{1}{H^{2}+R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta } \frac{u}{\sqrt{u^{2}+H^{2}+R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta }} } \right| } _{\,u=R\cos \theta }^{\,u=R_{\mathrm{C}} +R\cos \theta } ,\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(23)

which can be solved and rearranged as:

$$\begin{aligned} \omega= & {} \frac{2H}{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}}}\int _0^\pi {\mathrm{d}\theta -} 2H\int _0^\pi {\frac{\mathrm{d}\theta }{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}+R_{\mathrm{C}}^2 +2\,R\,R_{\mathrm{C}} \cos \theta }}} \nonumber \\&+\frac{2H}{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}}}\int _0^\pi {\frac{R^{2}\cos ^{2}\theta }{H^{2}+R^{2}-R^{2}\cos ^{2}\theta } \mathrm{d}\theta }\nonumber \\&-2R\,H\int _0^\pi {\frac{\cos \theta \mathrm{d}\theta }{H^{2}+R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta }\frac{R_{\mathrm{C}} +R\cos \theta }{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}+R_{\mathrm{C}}^2 +2\,R\,R_{\mathrm{C}} \cos \theta }}}.\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(24)

The first integral in (24) is immediate. Since the integrand function in the third term in (24) is symmetrical about \(\pi /2\) in the interval of integration, one can integrate it as:

$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{2\,H}{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}}}\int _0^\pi {\frac{R^{2}\cos ^{2}\theta }{H^{2}+R^{2}-R^{2}\cos ^{2}\theta } \mathrm{d}\theta } \nonumber \\&\quad = \frac{4\,H}{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}}} \left. {\left[ {-\theta +\sqrt{1+\frac{R^{2}}{H^{2}}}\tan ^{-1} \left( {\sqrt{1+\frac{R^{2}}{H^{2}}}\tan \theta } \right) } \right] } \right| _{\,0}^{{\,\pi }/2}\nonumber \\&\quad =2\pi \left( {1-\frac{H}{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}}}} \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(25)

Inserting (25) into (24) gives the analytical solution for the oblique solid angle:

$$\begin{aligned} \omega =2\pi \left( {1-\frac{1}{\pi }\int _0^\pi {\frac{H \mathrm{d}\theta }{\sqrt{H^{2}+R^{2}+R_{\mathrm{C}}^2 +2\,R\,R_{\mathrm{C}} \cos \theta }}\frac{H^{2}+R^{2}+R\,R_{\mathrm{C}} \cos \theta }{H^{2}+R^{2}\sin ^{2}\theta }} } \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(26)

which is equivalent to Eqs. (7) and (8), being valid for all \(R_{\mathrm{C}} \).

Figure 7 shows the value of \(\omega \) as a function of H, for different values of \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }\). For \({0<R}/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }<1\), \(\omega \) increases toward \(2\pi \), while for \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }>1\), \(\omega \) always increases initially, reaches a maximum, and then decreases towards zero. For \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }=1\), \(\omega \) increases, reaching the value of \(\pi \) when \(H=0\). It also shows that for any \(H\ne 0\), \(\omega \) varies continuously from a maximum, at \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }=0\), toward 0 as \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }\) approaches \(\infty \), whereas for \(H=0\), \(\omega \) exhibits a discontinuity of \(2\pi \) at \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }=1\), where it has the value of \(\omega =\pi \). A complementary analysis can be made using Fig. 8, which shows the variation in \(\omega \) with \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }\) for different values of H.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Plot of \(\omega \) as a function of H, for different values of \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }\). For a given \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }\), \(\omega \) is a continuous function of H. For a given \(H\ne 0\), \(\omega \) is a continuous function of \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }\), but for \(H=0\), \(\omega \) exhibits a discontinuity at \(R=R_{\mathrm{C}} \)

Fig. 8
figure 8

Plot of \(\omega \) as a function of \(R/{R_{\mathrm{C}} }\), for different values ofH. As \(H\rightarrow 0\), \(\omega \) exhibits a discontinuity of \(2\pi \) at \(R=R_{\mathrm{C}} \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, J.M., Anacleto, J. Magnetic field created by a conducting cylindrical shell of finite length. Electr Eng 99, 979–986 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0465-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0465-3

Keywords

Navigation